NairWizard
Somewhere
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2014
- Messages
- 1,947
holy smokes
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yeah, it's their strengths that make them top 10 despite having glaring flaws. It's interesting how people think Chrom is like, mid tier despite being similar to Roy in many ways, and many people cite his recovery holding him down. I don't know if I think Aegis has a much better recovery, but greater strengths make up for it, making them a top 10 character still.I want to say that people tend to overstate Aegis' recovery weakness but it is a genuine flaw. Instead I'll say people don't realize just how ridiculous Aegis' strengths are. They're a monster.
I would say people are more overestimating them than underestimating them, at least historically. Can't say I see many people put them outside of top 10 (MkLeo did, though). These days they might be closer to accurately rated, perhaps?People are underestimating them since their best players don't use them as much but they were still #3 on Lumirank. All I can say is thank god they got a bad recovery because otherwise they'd be better than Steve.
Leo used Byleth in pools. But the tourney SHADIC and MuteAce won is a C-Tier by LumiRank, and more of a regional, not a local.When did MkLeo use Byleth? I only saw Joker but I didn't watch every set. Nice to see MkLeo doing well again, I was hoping he'd lose to Sparg0 though since I want to see Sparg0 as #1 in the world.
In other news, SHADIC won a local yesterday against MuteAce (Grand Finals game 10, SHADIC from winners side after beating MuteAce in winners finals). SHADIC has gotten so good.
I don't believe he is.9. Riddles: He plays two characters (Terry and Kazuya). Not a solo main. I'm not sure how much he's actually getting from using these two instead of sticking with one. Is Kazuya not solo-mainable, or does he not want to give up on Terry? Still, he's spent enough time on both to essentially be considered a dual-main at this point.
SHADIC vs MuteAce was a spicy set that went to game 5, set 2. MuteAce SD'ing at near 0 was a big bummer during that final game, but still an immaculate performance from the two.Results for Cirque Du CFL 3. Grands made me so nervous. That was such a close and tense set.
1. SHADIC
2. MuteAce
3. Dabuz
4. Peabnut
5. Syrup
5. Zomba
7. Asimo
7. Miya
9. Cosmos
9. Anathema
9. Shuton
9. Lima
13. ApolloKage
13. Quandale Dingleingleton
13. ESAM
13. ChunkyKong
17. Mr. E
17. Goblin
17. sebayee
17. MVD
17. JMafia
17. Light
17. BMP
17. Surehyper
SHADIC is the first solo Corrin to win a major now. Guess it's time for Corrin discussion to come back!
Miya's last supermajor win was literally less than two months agoThe last several tournaments have backed up what I said about being a top tier but not a top 5 character. G&W definitely preforms very well, appearing in many top 8s but never quite manages to pull the win off. I think Miya was doing really well for a brief period when he started beating Acola and people weren't ready for that level of G&W but now counterplay is coming out. He's getting more realistic results again. The flavor of the month phenomenon is real.
And since then people figured out counter play to G&W. Miya's a top 5 player but he's losing to players ranked lower than him quite a bit. He got 17th at Genesis X, Second at Litvetational but with Steve too and 7th at Cirque Du CFL 3. This happens with a lot of characters. They have a few months of doing really well then someone else replaces them. I don't think G&W is going to go away; he'll keep getting top 8s but his flavor of the month period is over. Like I said before, I think Maester's placements with G&W are more indicative of how good the character is.Miya's last supermajor win was literally less than two months ago
In October last year, you made the assertion that G&W does not qualify for being at the top of the tier list on the basis that Miya and Maister both failed to take home several tournaments where the former would regularly place in Top 8. At the same eve of that post, Miya successfully won a supermajor, and has since then won one more in very recent history, while winning four of the seven majors he attended between that time frame, and soundly taking first at Genesis X's pre-major despite his upset the following main event. Your argument back then was that characters like Aegis and Joker were more quintessential top tiers ahead of G&W despite not a single solo-Aegis main reaching the peaks Miya has been doing over the last half year (Sparg0 owes his successes arguably more to Cloud at this point), and Joker's only real prominent main MkLeo no longer being a regular fixture in top 8's and even placing lower than Miya did at the tournament you hold over his head like an albatross.And since then people figured out counter play to G&W. Miya's a top 5 player but he's losing to players ranked lower than him quite a bit. He got 17th at Genesis X, Second at Litvetational but with Steve too and 7th at Cirque Du CFL 3. This happens with a lot of characters. They have a few months of doing really well then someone else replaces them. I don't think G&W is going to go away; he'll keep getting top 8s but his flavor of the month period is over. Like I said before, I think Maester's placements with G&W are more indicative of how good the character is.
Quote or it didn't happen. When I said G&W was high tier it was before Miya won anything notable. My perception of him improved with Miya like everyone else's.In October last year, you made the assertion that G&W does not qualify for being at the top of the tier list on the basis that Miya and Maister both failed to take home several tournaments where the former would regularly place in Top 8. At the same eve of that post, Miya successfully won a supermajor,
You're putting a lot of words in my mouth and mixing the time frame up. First, Aegis had 3 mains in the top 8 of a supermajor. They won all the time. Aegis in their heyday had much greater heights than G&W ever did. Aegis did indeed win tournaments solo; I remember both Spargo and MKLeo using him solo. Cosmos won tournaments with them. Granted they tapered off as time went on but it did happen. My point was just because a character gets less use by top players it doesn't mean they magically become worse. Aegis is still very much top 5 and the official tier list agrees with me. And by the way, MKLeo did win a recent tournament with Joker and Spargo just won one partially with Aegis.Your argument back then was that characters like Aegis and Joker were more quintessential top tiers ahead of G&W despite not a single solo-Aegis main reaching the peaks Miya has been doing over the last half year (Sparg0 owes his successes arguably more to Cloud at this point), and Joker's only real prominent main MkLeo no longer being a regular fixture in top 8's and even placing lower than Miya did at the tournament you hold over his head like an albatross.
No need to get snippy with me; people have different opinions. You've done nothing to disprove my point. The flavor of the months phenomenon is real. Characters rise and fall in popularity. It happened to Aegis, it happened to Steve and it'll happen to G&W. You have to observe long term trends. The problem is people have knee jerk reactions to top players instead of doing this.you hold over his head like an albatross.
I know that you've been a skeptic about this character and tried to cool people off on him ever since the 2019 halcyon days of reading into pre-pandemic OrionStats rankings when the character wasn't even top 15 despite rapidly trending upward, so I don't think I can read into your claims about G&W as anything but confirmation bias by looking at a limited time frame for a sample. "Ok, so maybe he's top tier, but Miya didn't do as good in some recent tournaments so G&W is absolutely not top 5" -- even though honestly it's just Genesis X that sticks out as an outlier considering his losses at Cirque 3 were from players who arose as extreme contenders. Like how does that distinction even matter, materially speaking?
Following this old post where you cite those three specific characters being better than G&W...Quote or it didn't happen. When I said G&W was high tier it was before Miya won anything notable. My perception of him improved with Miya like everyone else's.
... and after Miya finally winning that same day, you argued that Steve, Joker, Palutena, Aegis, ROB, Sonic, and Snake were all better characters than G&W, along with listing a drove of characters you viewed as being about on par with the character. Based on your recent posts about where you place G&W, and the reason you have for bringing that up, I have no reason to believe that opinion has changed much despite you expressing having more faith in Miya.I noticed has been getting 3rd place a lot lately. By Miya losing to Debuz and Acola, Miya losing to Hurt and Acola (sorry I can't remember the tournament names), and Maister losing to Skyjay and MKLeo in Maingame Fest Mini. G&W's really good but not quite at the top of the tier list like Steve, Aegis and Joker. An 'Always the bride's maid, never the bride' kind of character.
Then you shouldn't use Genesis X as some kind of proof of a long held assertion that G&W doesn't cut the mustard for Top 5, and instead pay attention to what's happening and how long it's been happening, because that's just silly talk. It looks like just as much of a kneejerk reaction against so much that these players have achieved, and what these characters are doing in all of these hundreds of sets that have been played for the last year.I guess the crux of my argument is that people put too much emphasis on top players and not enough on long term trends. G&W jumping several spots on the tier list is what I'd call a knee jerk reaction to Miya.
I think G&W might have the best "ease of use" to "strength" ratio in the game. G&W is really easy to pick up, really easy to play, while still being one of the strongest characters. While I do think both Steve and Sonic are better once mastered both of them take more effort to pick up, whereas G&W is quite easy to pick up. If you have infinite time a Steve secondary might be a better fit than a G&W secondary, but if you don't want to spend much time on a secondary, G&W might be a good option.Game and Watch is the best character in the game to me, and here's why: if someone asks me for a good secondary to pick up for their bad matchups, it's going to be Game and Watch almost 50% of the time.
I agree. I think it's pretty obvious that G&W would be a strong secondary for many people. However, even if he's easy to pick up, there's still quite a bit of a time investment in order to use him as a secondary, and a secondary G&W might not be enough to beat the strongest players when even G&W mains fail. Still might be nice to have to say, turn a -1 MU into a +2 MU. G&W, Cloud, and Corrin seem like some of the best secondaries right now (not counting "former mains", which are useful since they don't take as much time to pick up). A Steve secondary is almost always going to be a strong pick, but it's quite a time investment. G&W/Cloud/Corrin may be weaker than Steve, but they take less time and effort to pick up.It doesn't matter to me that people aren't using secondary Game and Watch -- the fact is that they could be, it's obvious how strong the choice is, and if some new player comes to me today and asks me who to main or secondary, Game and Watch will be one of my first choices.
Surprised Diddy is only that slightly losing when Vs tweek that looked really painful for him.Btw, Riddles did a Kazuya Matchup Chart yesterday on his stream
At that point I had already said that G&W was top tier so my stance didn't change since then. I still believe that except maybe not about Snake being better. Snake's mobility has proven to be more of a weakness than I thought but that's another topic. I think people are overestimating the honeymoon phase of G&W. I've played a lot of tournaments and there's such a thing as knowing the MU but not knowing the MU against a player of a higher caliber. One time I played someone who was PRed 4th in Colorado and he was three stocking me with Fox. At first Fox seemed invincible; like you couldn't do anything against him. We played several friendlies and the games gradually became closer. Eventually I even took a game or 2. I'm seeing the same thing happening with Miya. He's so good he made G&W's weakness not look apparent at first. Then he started losing to more and more people ranked significantly below him. He was 2nd on Lumirank 2023 and now he's 4th (it's not one isolated incident), which is still amazing but cracks are starting to appear in his armor. People light Light and Shadic are adapting and beating him.Following this old post where you cite those three specific characters being better than G&W...
... and after Miya finally winning that same day, you argued that Steve, Joker, Palutena, Aegis, ROB, Sonic, and Snake were all better characters than G&W, along with listing a drove of characters you viewed as being about on par with the character. Based on your recent posts about where you place G&W, and the reason you have for bringing that up, I have no reason to believe that opinion has changed much despite you expressing having more faith in Miya.
Yeah, you're right. As you pointed out in another post, it's very hard to use a secondary properly in this game, since most characters require high investment. Game and Watch requiring such little investment is a big argument in his favor. There's no other character who is so consistently strong at all levels of play, and across different levels of investment.Y'know, it's interesting. There are many aspects of "easy to play" vs "hard to play". Steve, for instance, has a lot of tech that you might want to learn, and you can't just play Steve as a regular vanilla character, you have to learn Steve specific things. However, Steve has a rather easy time with adjusting his gameplan in various MUs. As a result, Steve can mostly play the same way in most MUs, thus having a really basic gameplan that works in every MU. The same can not be said for characters like Lucina, Palutena, Wolf, and Corrin. They may be simple to pick up and play, but they have to learn MUs.
So it depends a bit on what you want to use your secondary for. Do you want a secondary that you'll use for many MUs, or one that you'll only want to use for a few specific characters? If's the latter, someone like Corrin or Cloud would be useful, since you can just focus on learning that one MUs. If it's the former, someone with an easy gameplan, like Steve or Samus, might be useful.
Or you could go G&W and get an easy gameplan while also being easy to learn and play. If I were to pick one character as a generic secondary that takes relatively little effort while also being super good, it'd be G&W.
I post matchup charts from top players on here whenever they release on my Twitter or Reddit feed, Corrin being considered a bad matchup for Kazuya had nothing to do with that.I get that Corrin just won, but we've just had pages of talk about Corrin, and every topic seems to steer back to Corrin -- the Kazuya MU chart was likely only posted because Corrin is listed as one of only 5 losing matchups, the secondary discussion suddenly came back to Corrin, etc.
Okay, fair.I post matchup charts from top players on here whenever they release on my Twitter or Reddit feed, Corrin being considered a bad matchup for Kazuya had nothing to do with that.
I play Pyra/Mythra and am fairly positive on the character, still thinking them to be a top 10 mainstay and possibly top 5/right outside the top 5. I think the meta relevant characters are the ones that can play rather defensive but possess a very strong advantage state and good damage output. This is why Steve and Sonic are getting strong results atm, they force the opponent to approach and make the wrong move, and when the opponent makes the wrong move they can capitalize off of it with a lot of damage and edgeguard. ROB, G&W and Snake also all have tools for a similar gameplan. Sword characters/fundies based characters like Cloud and Palutena can possess the tools to beat a lot of the really good characters rn.Okay, fair.
You post a lot of tourney results, matchup charts, links to things, etc. It'd be cool to see some of your thoughts on characters, independent of those things.
Asking in good faith: who do you play? What do you think of the meta?
Nice to see another Pyra/Mythra main. What matchups do you struggle with? I keep seeing people say that Pyra/Mythra is overrated but I always wonder what matchups they think Aegis actually loses. When I play the character, all I feel is boundless power in my hands, and when I lose I always think that it's because I didn't swap at the right time or I got too aggressive/haphazard with n-airs.I play Pyra/Mythra and am fairly positive on the character, still thinking them to be a top 10 mainstay and possibly top 5/right outside the top 5. I think the meta relevant characters are the ones that can play rather defensive but possess a very strong advantage state and good damage output. This is why Steve and Sonic are getting strong results atm, they force the opponent to approach and make the wrong move, and when the opponent makes the wrong move they can capitalize off of it with a lot of damage and edgeguard. ROB, G&W and Snake also all have tools for a similar gameplan. Sword characters/fundies based characters like Cloud and Palutena can possess the tools to beat a lot of the really good characters rn.
That being said, I think characters need to possess a heavy "X-Factor" in order to be like top 20 or better. Either consistent and strong kill power (Diamond Steve, ROB, Kazuya, Pyra, Roy, Corrin, Wario), phenomenal edgeguarding/recovery (Sonic, ROB, Min Min) or strong comeback mechanics (Joker, Cloud) are necessary for success. If your character doesn't have cheese, they're probably not that good. One of the reasons Inkling fell off super hard was the lack of X-Factor, Inkling struggles taking the stock unless you get a really good edgeguard, and it was easy to play around the up-throw into up-air confirm.
Finally someone who doesn't underrate Aegis. IMO Aegis is one of Young Link's worst MUs along side Cloud and Hero. Mythra has better hitboxes, framedata and mobility than YL and she absolutely bullies him. Although YL does win neutral, like vs everyone, it's not by a lot and he has a terrible time in disadvantage. Aegis also kills YL earlier than vice versa.Nice to see another Pyra/Mythra main. What matchups do you struggle with? I keep seeing people say that Pyra/Mythra is overrated but I always wonder what matchups they think Aegis actually loses. When I play the character, all I feel is boundless power in my hands, and when I lose I always think that it's because I didn't swap at the right time or I got too aggressive/haphazard with n-airs.
The one I hear most commonly is Min Min, but acola's Aegis vs. Doramigi showed that the optimal way to play that MU makes the MU look Aegis-favored. Besides that, I don't really know if P/M lose any matchups. Pikachu, Diddy Kong, Fox, and Wolf all come to mind as possible "difficult matchups," but there's so much room to improve in all of them. In particular, I think Fox and Wolf matchups are going to pan out to be Aegis-favored in the long term, because neither character deals well with Pyra reversals, and for the Diddy matchup, I think just avoiding PS2 fixes most of the issues that P/Ms face in it. PS2 gives Diddy a lot of room to pull banana, and Mythra's speed isn't suffocating enough there relative to the stage size.
Opening up the conversation to other people, does your character do well vs. Aegis, or do you hate the Aegis MU?
I think Diddy Kong can be rather annoying for Pyra/Mythra. Diddy is hard to hit due to how evasive he is, he has good mobility, and js good at edgeguarding them. That said I know that Pyra/Mythra does possess the tools to deal with Diddy Kong, like I think Mythra players can abuse how hard it is to hit Mythra in the matchup too. Sparg0 and Cosmos have beaten Tweek's Diddy with before, though it was a while ago.Nice to see another Pyra/Mythra main. What matchups do you struggle with? I keep seeing people say that Pyra/Mythra is overrated but I always wonder what matchups they think Aegis actually loses. When I play the character, all I feel is boundless power in my hands, and when I lose I always think that it's because I didn't swap at the right time or I got too aggressive/haphazard with n-airs.
The one I hear most commonly is Min Min, but acola's Aegis vs. Doramigi showed that the optimal way to play that MU makes the MU look Aegis-favored. Besides that, I don't really know if P/M lose any matchups. Pikachu, Diddy Kong, Fox, and Wolf all come to mind as possible "difficult matchups," but there's so much room to improve in all of them. In particular, I think Fox and Wolf matchups are going to pan out to be Aegis-favored in the long term, because neither character deals well with Pyra reversals, and for the Diddy matchup, I think just avoiding PS2 fixes most of the issues that P/Ms face in it. PS2 gives Diddy a lot of room to pull banana, and Mythra's speed isn't suffocating enough there relative to the stage size.
Opening up the conversation to other people, does your character do well vs. Aegis, or do you hate the Aegis MU?