boysilver400
Smash Apprentice
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2018
- Messages
- 138
This isn’t just with Kirby. People still underrate characters like anddespite their placings at majors because “Bowser jr got so many nerfs” or “Robins too slow” or...I don’t even know why people still sleep on Duck Hunt.And when Kirby gets 17th and 13th at A and B tiers "idk guys, still not good"
Then we have everyone fearmongering over saying he’s the undisputed best in the game when he isn’t even top 20 in terms of results. I get that results don’t mean everything but but when he isn’t even top 20...I just don’t see how he can be #1 in the game outside of theoretically having the best Mu chart in the game when Joker exists.
I know a lot of people talk about how people put too much of their opinions on results but lately I’ve been seeing the exact opposite. I’ve seen tier lists that came out a few months ago with the December bottom 3 and people still put above characters with far more results because of his laggy punishable smash attacks. MU charts aren’t any better because top player mu charts put the same few chars like Kirby and many Other low tiers(but mostly Kirby) in +2 despite probably never facing a competent player of said character and the Mice, Joker and Palu at -2, and the mid tiers are -1 or even or something like that. Matchup charts have pretty much become glorified tier lists at this point and has caused people to think that top tier/low tier matchups are 100% always in the top tiers favor.
At this point I’m sick of tier lists and matchup charts because of this. At least on Twitter, anyway.