And I'm referring to buffs/nerfs as "points" to be abstract.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
This is not possible. If you wanted to remain in a time zone, you'd have to vote for that specific time zone.TO OVERSWARM:
Is it possible to vote, "No Travel" as you can vote, "No Lynch?"
This would be more significant since you cannot unvote it.
Joel, if you think I'm gonna let you get away with pretending an OMGUS vote (and OMGUS accusation) is scumhunting, you're completely wrong.Well, that happened now, Mr. scummyscummyscumscum.
Cause he IS mafia.
lol wow. I'm playing similar? I thought I was playing way more offensively and out of the frame than in the last game where I actually was trying to blend in purposely.
You're in Australia, so you're in a different timezone as well.
Sorry, but I can only last as long until I start passing out over my desk, and I presume it would result in the same "postponing", just that I leave without "johns" that it was friggin' late in my area.
I always was returning to the discussion as soon as I got sleep, which is, in this case, right now. I have no idea how you can think that "oh it's 5 AM, look, I'm going to sleep now cause I don't make any sense anymore anyway, we'll discuss this more later, k?" is a john.
If you think being active and saying "Hey guys, I don't think that it's helpful if we lynch prematurely based around stupid crap, so I'll just vote no lynch until something else comes up" is scummy, then I have no idea what is WRONG WITH YOU.
This is such a bad post... kind of upset I voted for this now lol2300 A.D. is arguably the most important and beneficial place for the good guys.
Mafia = serious business.And guess what, you are mine.
Ignoring me repeating saying MULTIPLE TIMES that I had a REASON to vote for No Lynch (which promptly was changed anyway) and accusing me that I "just wanted to distract" is absolutely NOT helpful. It's just as OMGUS as me going against you is now. Seriously, stop being a ****** and start reading.
I would assume he's suspicious of you cause you're doing exactly what you were doing last game, being unhelpful on purpose.omni, do u really find me suspicious pretty much just based on the fact that I'm pressuring u more than anyone else? kind of a personal reason more than a scumtell am I right?
I had. Pierce. But he doesn't seem all too suspicious to me now. Hence I voted no lynch. I REPEAT FOR THE FIFTH TIME:So wait till you have a candidate...
Actually, I knew YOU would jump on it. Noone else made a big deal out of me voting for no lynch, because the others were smart enough to understand my motivation, apparently.And you explicitly said "you knew somebody would jump on it"
Rather said, I knew that you would start your whole "blablablababblebabblebabble" cases again that are just friggin stupid. Seriously, if I was scum, I'd never play as openly. You think that even IF I was scum, I would play "the same" as in the former game and not have wisened up? That's just stupid.which meant that you knew it would be distracting
I thought since the abbreviation means "Oh my God, you suck", that it is basically voting/accusing based on stupidity.Also, OMGUS= votes/accusations based solely on the fact that somebody voted for you.
Well if I'm not fooling anyone, how come you think I'm actually scum? lmao. That's so stupid. "Hey man, it's so clear that you're too smart for being that stupid, so you cannot fool anyone. Also, you are too stupid for being smart enough for not playing stupidly like that."if you're town, you're doing what I did the beginning of last game by getting convinced of scum alignments because of something that wasn't scummy, if you're scum... you're not fooling anyone
No, not because of blah, but because of the TIME. Look man, it's Day 1. DAY 1. The very first Day. The day before Night 1, the very first Night something happens. The day before Day 2, the very first day we actually have something to base our theories on.you still haven't actually done anything in regards to scumhunting because [...]
Sweetie, if you "can" determine that on Day 1 based on a couple of posts already, you're playing exactly the same as in the earlier game. You just chose different victims this time around.I don't like your entire mode of play, it seems like you'd do anything to avoid scum-hunting.
To add in: The others understood my motivation apparently, after reading my first answer to your accusation where I explained my stance on the situation. Seriously, you are the one beating the dead horse, look how nobody else said anything about that vote.Actually, I knew YOU would jump on it. Noone else made a big deal out of me voting for no lynch, because the others were smart enough to understand my motivation, apparently.
Joel, I'm not convinced that you're mafia, however your distraction tactic is by far the most scummy out of the actions made so far. I'm not sure exactly why you did it, but I know you're too smart to just release that without some intent or reason , and me calling you out on it is just scumhunting, searching for suspects.I had. Pierce. But he doesn't seem all too suspicious to me now. Hence I voted no lynch. I REPEAT FOR THE FIFTH TIME:
The voting for no lynch expressed my stance of that there is nobody who's actually suspicious enough to vote for. That's what I was saying the whole time.
Actually, I knew YOU would jump on it. Noone else made a big deal out of me voting for no lynch, because the others were smart enough to understand my motivation, apparently.
Rather said, I knew that you would start your whole "blablablababblebabblebabble" cases again that are just friggin stupid. Seriously, if I was scum, I'd never play as openly. You think that even IF I was scum, I would play "the same" as in the former game and not have wisened up? That's just stupid.
I thought since the abbreviation means "Oh my God, you suck", that it is basically voting/accusing based on stupidity.
Well if I'm not fooling anyone, how come you think I'm actually scum? lmao. That's so stupid. "Hey man, it's so clear that you're too smart for being that stupid, so you cannot fool anyone. Also, you are too stupid for being smart enough for not playing stupidly like that."
This is your entire argument.
No, not because of blah, but because of the TIME. Look man, it's Day 1. DAY 1. The very first Day. The day before Night 1, the very first Night something happens. The day before Day 2, the very first day we actually have something to base our theories on.
Sweetie, if you "can" determine that on Day 1 based on a couple of posts already, you're playing exactly the same as in the earlier game. You just chose different victims this time around.
But when you were active about anything, you were very unhelpful, and this exchange:I would disagree, last game I was being largely inactive (along with all my other games cause of class). this game I'm being more than active, I just guess omni isn't handling the pressure well and is resorting to omgus tactics...
im not explaining a fact that is explained in the OP because you're too lazy to confirm/investigate it
also in the OP: "If there is a tie, all players will be stuck in "End of Time". You cannot vote for End of Time, but it otherwise acts as a standard time period."
altho if u JUST read my post to edrees i stated in fineprint that i did not miss the news update.
why are you skimming, chibo
why are you skimming, omni
Currently, I don't find anyone too suspicious. Rajam is just being a nood and as for Pierce, while his superstrong desire to go to EoT is strange, I wouldn't say it was suspicious - for now at least.
I'm not "messing with you". I think that the evidence is not enough to point towards a suspect. Seriously, it's *******Day 1.
I said TWICE - in both the original explanation and the second explanation - that I am not finding anyone to be suspicious as of now.
This might change. [...]
More likely than not, a premature lynch will cripple town because we lose a power role. We don't know how many mafia members there are. You have that mathematical fetish, don't you? Just calculate our chances to hit scum in Day 1 - without any evidence.
If you think being active and saying "Hey guys, I don't think that it's helpful if we lynch prematurely based around stupid crap, so I'll just vote no lynch until something else comes up" is scummy, then I have no idea what is WRONG WITH YOU.
Ignoring me repeating saying MULTIPLE TIMES that I had a REASON to vote for No Lynch (which promptly was changed anyway) and accusing me that I "just wanted to distract" is absolutely NOT helpful. It's just as OMGUS as me going against you is now. Seriously, stop being a ****** and start reading.
I had. Pierce. But he doesn't seem all too suspicious to me now. Hence I voted no lynch. I REPEAT FOR THE FIFTH TIME:
The voting for no lynch expressed my stance of that there is nobody who's actually suspicious enough to vote for. That's what I was saying the whole time.
A typical unvote would have had the exact same effect. However a vote for No Lynch is in itself a PROPER vote. To top it off you decided to vote adum and start a tangent of "he is scummyscummyscummyscumscum" or whatever just because he called it into question.I haven't seen the part of your motivation that explains why you would do that ... without just doing a typical unvote;
unvoteI would disagree, last game I was being largely inactive (along with all my other games cause of class). this game I'm being more than active, I just guess omni isn't handling the pressure well and is resorting to omgus tactics...
right. appreciating you being game and im sure all of us are trembling from the wrath of your scumhunting.I'm game, I'm around this time. BBRs gonna feel the wrath of a real scumhuntin Chibo. Schools not gonna keep me down this time.
Taking somebody to task for distracting from useful discussion IS useful discussion.A typical unvote however would've not expressed my stance of "I think we shouldn't lynch anyone currently".
As for the vote on adumbrodeus: I voted him cause he were riding on me "trying to distract" from useful discussion, while HE was the one who distracted in the first place because HE was the one who was riding on that no lynch-vote and did NOT read my MULTIPLE explanations.
Ackward... because I'm scumhunting?so my choice for today's play is between chibo, rajam, and adumbrodeus at the moment.
- chibo out of explained reasons
- rajam out of lurking
- adumbrodeus just because i find his play awkward compared to last game.
where are you guys suspicions landing at the moment
Bringing up that somebody is acting scummy is scumhunting, as I said before... And no, it shouldn't have, because you didn't give a legit reason for a "no lynch" vs. a regular unvote, or you know, a reason why you weren't scumhunting. So I'm left with the reason you gave initially, that somebody was gonna jump on it. The ad hominem and the "scummy mcscumscum" whatever that was, just suggests that you're not handeling pressure well, which makes your case worse.Yea, whatever. You are the one keeping bringing it up over and over again. It should've stayed with a question and an answer at most, but you kept on saying "omg u r scumm with tat cuz u b distractin!!" all the time, and I was saying "lol, read up again, but here again for you: [reason]." And then you again were "ok but u r still scumm with tat cuz u b distractin!!".
That's basically all our "discussion" was about. It should've ended with me saying that the vote for No Lynch expressed my stance. Whether or not you feel this is "enough", I don't care. Hell I don't even care if you lynch me, lol. I just try to play this game, you're the one who's all over the place with "omg u scumm u!"
Fact is, though, you ARE being as stupid and useless like you were in the last game currently.Ackward... because I'm scumhunting?
I'm playing similarly to what I was at the end of the last game, calling out people that I thought were suspicious as soon as I noticed it.
aka, I'm trying to avoid being stupid and useless like I was last game.
Hey there, I have Day 1 on the phone. He wants me to tell you you're playing like a moron when you think that Day 1 is the best occasion for scumhunting.a reason why you weren't scumhunting.
I wanted to edit that post originally for it to say "I know adumbrodeus is going to jump on it". But since there are other players I don't know about how they play I went with "someone". Seriously, yea. I knew someone was going to say something about me voting No Lynch without any explanation. So? What's so scummy about that?So I'm left with the reason you gave initially, that somebody was gonna jump on it.
The ad hominem wasn't coming from your "pressure", it came from your blindness and me feeling like a broken record. The scummyscum thing was just being silly.The ad hominem and the "scummy mcscumscum" whatever that was, just suggests that you're not handeling pressure well, which makes your case worse.
....Unvote
Vote: Marc
Where the heck are you? You are extreeeemeely quiet. Who do you consider (if anyone) scummy at this point? No need to chip in on all the time traveling business though, that's really a waste of more time and energy.
Guys, I'm up for the "go with the time periods the game goes" idea. I'm down for 600 AD as well, then after that we can go to the future. Still, I'll save my vote when I can confirm we won't have a tie before I throw it out there.
My top suspicions after getting up to date with this thread.
1) Adumbrodeus. Seriously, I'm do not understand your play this time around, whereas last game, I was actually defending you the whole time because you felt legit to me as town. Not feeling you this time.
2) Rajaam. While he is new, he's really really awkward about it. His newbieness isn't as innocent as Darkmusician's was last game.
3) Marc. Seriously, quiet as a feather.
I already explained my reasons.THIS!!!! QFT
might I remind youthat this is Chrono Trigger Mafia.Might I remind you that going to EoT being bad for town is still just flavor talk, and we're not even sure of this. The reason why it's better to explore early game ISN'T BECAUSE THE TIMEZONE ITSELF MIGHT BE DANGEROUS, BUT BECAUSE THE METHOD OF TRAVELING THERE IS TRICKY TO EXECUTE. PLEASE DON'T MAKE ME HAVE TO EXPLAIN THIS AGAIN.
This is Chrono Trigger Mafia!THIS IS FLAVOR THEORY.
MORE DANGEROUS STILL MEANS ITS DANGEROUS!THIS IS FLAVOR THEORY, and because THE METHOD OF TRAVELLING HERE IS DIFFICULT TO EXECUTE, AND MUCH HARDER/MORE DANGEROUS LATER IN THE GAME.
THIS IS CHRONO TRIGGER MAFIATHIS IS FLAVOR THEORY
The problem is you are acting like it is STANDARD mafia.(omfg, I'm going to pull my hair out, and I honestly think I'm getting trolled in a game of Mafia)
The problem is this...If Town decides to travel to EoT, and then we deliberately cast our votes to tie, he who breaks this plan is not town. Someone else besides Shadowlink call me out if this honestly doesn't make sense to you. Actually, if this DOES make sense you, please say it does, so I KNOW I'm not going crazy.
HEY GUYS LETS GO TO SOMETHING THAT WE ALL CONSIDER A DANGEROUS TIMEZONE NOW RATHER THAN LATER BECAUSE WE NEED TO EXPLORE IT!As I've said before, I PREFER to go there SOONER RATHER THAN LATER, IF we choose to go there at all. Furthermore, I AM AGAINST THE IDEA OF LEAVING A TIME ZONE COMPLETELY UNEXPLORED.
EXCEPT THE FUNCTION OF EOT WAS TO LIMIT THE NUMBER OF PARTY MEMBERS!WE DON'T KNOW THIS! WE HAVE NO IDEA WHAT'S THERE. IT COULD BE AUTO-GAME LOSS, OR TOWN COULD GAIN POWERFUL MAGICS, I DON'T KNOW ANYMORE THAN YOU DO. WE CAN EITHER CHOOSE TO AVOID IT, OR GO THERE. IF WE ARE GOING TO GO THERE, THEN NOW, AT OUR PEAK STRENGTH, IS BETTER THAN LATER, SINCE VOTING TO GO THERE REQUIRES A DIFFERENT TYPE OF VOTE, THAT CAN BE EASILY DISRUPTED. AND PEOPLE SEEM CAUGHT UP ON FLAVOR THAT EOT IS BAD.
Most of the player's figured out that flavor was integrated into the game more so tan the last Mafia game.Well, had I not said anything, I do not think I would have realized that there were multiple players who wish to NEVER go to end of time, and Omni would still be under the impression that EoT locked up time-travel.
Except for the fact it may STILL RESTRICT town.I never thought it did, elsewise I wouldn't have wanted to explore the region, and OBVIOUSLY not have wanted to explore it first. Had this been the case, even suggesting it would have been putting a neon sign over my head flashing, "Scum, scum, scum."
This is CT MAFIA>THIS IS FLAVOR THEORY.
This is a STUPID idea and here is why.Also, if this is true, it could also still be GOOD for town. The ability to limit someone's play if they are suspected to be mafia is fairly good. However, I didn't suggest this even though the thought occurred to me previously because THIS IS FLAVOR THEORY.
Isn't there a role called the village idiot or something?I think you'd have to be SCUM to think this was a bad idea, lol
...I wouldn't have to elaborate to say that this is a failure at elaboration. If you would?