• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Chrono Trigger Mafia: Omni and Scamp Win! Adumbrodeus wins!

Overswarm

is laughing at you
Joined
May 4, 2005
Messages
21,181
TO OVERSWARM:

Is it possible to vote, "No Travel" as you can vote, "No Lynch?"

This would be more significant since you cannot unvote it.
This is not possible. If you wanted to remain in a time zone, you'd have to vote for that specific time zone.
 

adumbrodeus

Smash Legend
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Messages
11,321
Location
Tri-state area
Well, that happened now, Mr. scummyscummyscumscum.



Cause he IS mafia.



lol wow. I'm playing similar? I thought I was playing way more offensively and out of the frame than in the last game where I actually was trying to blend in purposely.



You're in Australia, so you're in a different timezone as well.
Sorry, but I can only last as long until I start passing out over my desk, and I presume it would result in the same "postponing", just that I leave without "johns" that it was friggin' late in my area.
I always was returning to the discussion as soon as I got sleep, which is, in this case, right now. I have no idea how you can think that "oh it's 5 AM, look, I'm going to sleep now cause I don't make any sense anymore anyway, we'll discuss this more later, k?" is a john.



If you think being active and saying "Hey guys, I don't think that it's helpful if we lynch prematurely based around stupid crap, so I'll just vote no lynch until something else comes up" is scummy, then I have no idea what is WRONG WITH YOU.
Joel, if you think I'm gonna let you get away with pretending an OMGUS vote (and OMGUS accusation) is scumhunting, you're completely wrong.


Going after somebody because they pressured you when you had a scumtell isn't scumhunting, because the action isn't suspicious.


Congrats, you're my top lynch candidate for the day.
 

Red Arremer

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
11,437
Location
Vienna
And guess what, you are mine.

Ignoring me repeating saying MULTIPLE TIMES that I had a REASON to vote for No Lynch (which promptly was changed anyway) and accusing me that I "just wanted to distract" is absolutely NOT helpful. It's just as OMGUS as me going against you is now. Seriously, stop being a ****** and start reading.
 

Red Arremer

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
11,437
Location
Vienna
Also, just for the record, the "Cause I felt like it :p"-line was a joke. It has a smiley in it. I hardly ever use smileys, shouldn't you have noticed that. So your whole case is based on a joke, I guess that means it's a joke too.
 

CT Chia

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Sep 4, 2007
Messages
24,416
Location
Philadelphia
2300 A.D. is arguably the most important and beneficial place for the good guys.
This is such a bad post... kind of upset I voted for this now lol

but regardless Id rather we didn't fumble between 3 or 4 time periods in voting, so I chose one of the 2 already voted on, and went with the person I'm currently not voting.

...

omni, do u really find me suspicious pretty much just based on the fact that I'm pressuring u more than anyone else? kind of a personal reason more than a scumtell am I right?
 

adumbrodeus

Smash Legend
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Messages
11,321
Location
Tri-state area
And guess what, you are mine.

Ignoring me repeating saying MULTIPLE TIMES that I had a REASON to vote for No Lynch (which promptly was changed anyway) and accusing me that I "just wanted to distract" is absolutely NOT helpful. It's just as OMGUS as me going against you is now. Seriously, stop being a ****** and start reading.
Mafia = serious business.


So wait till you have a candidate...

And you explicitly said "you knew somebody would jump on it", which meant that you knew it would be distracting, so it was either a stupid jester-like maneuver... or a scum maneuver to distract from scumhunting.

You're too smart for the former.



Also, OMGUS= votes/accusations based solely on the fact that somebody voted for you.



So, I'm your lynch choice, as much as that doesn't help your position (if you're town, you're doing what I did the beginning of last game by getting convinced of scum alignments because of something that wasn't scummy, if you're scum... you're not fooling anyone) you still haven't actually done anything in regards to scumhunting because you haven't tried to pressure me for information (not like you have a scum-slip to pressure me based on).


I don't like your entire mode of play, it seems like you'd do anything to avoid scum-hunting.


omni, do u really find me suspicious pretty much just based on the fact that I'm pressuring u more than anyone else? kind of a personal reason more than a scumtell am I right?
I would assume he's suspicious of you cause you're doing exactly what you were doing last game, being unhelpful on purpose.
 

CT Chia

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Sep 4, 2007
Messages
24,416
Location
Philadelphia
I would disagree, last game I was being largely inactive (along with all my other games cause of class). this game I'm being more than active, I just guess omni isn't handling the pressure well and is resorting to omgus tactics...
 

Red Arremer

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
11,437
Location
Vienna
So wait till you have a candidate...
I had. Pierce. But he doesn't seem all too suspicious to me now. Hence I voted no lynch. I REPEAT FOR THE FIFTH TIME:
The voting for no lynch expressed my stance of that there is nobody who's actually suspicious enough to vote for. That's what I was saying the whole time.

And you explicitly said "you knew somebody would jump on it"
Actually, I knew YOU would jump on it. Noone else made a big deal out of me voting for no lynch, because the others were smart enough to understand my motivation, apparently.

which meant that you knew it would be distracting
Rather said, I knew that you would start your whole "blablablababblebabblebabble" cases again that are just friggin stupid. Seriously, if I was scum, I'd never play as openly. You think that even IF I was scum, I would play "the same" as in the former game and not have wisened up? That's just stupid.

Also, OMGUS= votes/accusations based solely on the fact that somebody voted for you.
I thought since the abbreviation means "Oh my God, you suck", that it is basically voting/accusing based on stupidity.

if you're town, you're doing what I did the beginning of last game by getting convinced of scum alignments because of something that wasn't scummy, if you're scum... you're not fooling anyone
Well if I'm not fooling anyone, how come you think I'm actually scum? lmao. That's so stupid. "Hey man, it's so clear that you're too smart for being that stupid, so you cannot fool anyone. Also, you are too stupid for being smart enough for not playing stupidly like that."

This is your entire argument.

you still haven't actually done anything in regards to scumhunting because [...]
No, not because of blah, but because of the TIME. Look man, it's Day 1. DAY 1. The very first Day. The day before Night 1, the very first Night something happens. The day before Day 2, the very first day we actually have something to base our theories on.

I don't like your entire mode of play, it seems like you'd do anything to avoid scum-hunting.
Sweetie, if you "can" determine that on Day 1 based on a couple of posts already, you're playing exactly the same as in the earlier game. You just chose different victims this time around.
 

Red Arremer

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
11,437
Location
Vienna
Actually, I knew YOU would jump on it. Noone else made a big deal out of me voting for no lynch, because the others were smart enough to understand my motivation, apparently.
To add in: The others understood my motivation apparently, after reading my first answer to your accusation where I explained my stance on the situation. Seriously, you are the one beating the dead horse, look how nobody else said anything about that vote.
 

adumbrodeus

Smash Legend
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Messages
11,321
Location
Tri-state area
I had. Pierce. But he doesn't seem all too suspicious to me now. Hence I voted no lynch. I REPEAT FOR THE FIFTH TIME:
The voting for no lynch expressed my stance of that there is nobody who's actually suspicious enough to vote for. That's what I was saying the whole time.



Actually, I knew YOU would jump on it. Noone else made a big deal out of me voting for no lynch, because the others were smart enough to understand my motivation, apparently.



Rather said, I knew that you would start your whole "blablablababblebabblebabble" cases again that are just friggin stupid. Seriously, if I was scum, I'd never play as openly. You think that even IF I was scum, I would play "the same" as in the former game and not have wisened up? That's just stupid.



I thought since the abbreviation means "Oh my God, you suck", that it is basically voting/accusing based on stupidity.



Well if I'm not fooling anyone, how come you think I'm actually scum? lmao. That's so stupid. "Hey man, it's so clear that you're too smart for being that stupid, so you cannot fool anyone. Also, you are too stupid for being smart enough for not playing stupidly like that."

This is your entire argument.



No, not because of blah, but because of the TIME. Look man, it's Day 1. DAY 1. The very first Day. The day before Night 1, the very first Night something happens. The day before Day 2, the very first day we actually have something to base our theories on.



Sweetie, if you "can" determine that on Day 1 based on a couple of posts already, you're playing exactly the same as in the earlier game. You just chose different victims this time around.
Joel, I'm not convinced that you're mafia, however your distraction tactic is by far the most scummy out of the actions made so far. I'm not sure exactly why you did it, but I know you're too smart to just release that without some intent or reason , and me calling you out on it is just scumhunting, searching for suspects.


If you wanna OMGUS me based on that, it just makes you look worse (btw, "you suck" as in "you're a mean horrible person and I hope you die in a fire" not "you suck at this game"), so a little friendly advice, instead of concentrating on how I'm such a horrible person, try proving to me that you're less suspicious through effective scumhunting.


You don't have to stick to just one suspect, there are plenty of people to poke at atm, omni named a couple. Just sticking with one suspect and never deviating is anti-town because it gives you tunnel vision which we don't need if you are town.


So, look for legit scumtells.
 

adumbrodeus

Smash Legend
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Messages
11,321
Location
Tri-state area
I would disagree, last game I was being largely inactive (along with all my other games cause of class). this game I'm being more than active, I just guess omni isn't handling the pressure well and is resorting to omgus tactics...
But when you were active about anything, you were very unhelpful, and this exchange:


im not explaining a fact that is explained in the OP because you're too lazy to confirm/investigate it

also in the OP: "If there is a tie, all players will be stuck in "End of Time". You cannot vote for End of Time, but it otherwise acts as a standard time period."

altho if u JUST read my post to edrees i stated in fineprint that i did not miss the news update.

why are you skimming, chibo
why are you skimming, omni

Suggests a similar mindset. I don't like your play right now and I suggest that rather then being obtuse, you scumhunt. You aren't proven town this game, so there's nothing to protect you from being lynched.
 

Red Arremer

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
11,437
Location
Vienna
I've already voted somebody else, are you blind? -_-
I also explained my motivation for the No Lynch vote. But for the sake of it.

Unvote
 

Shaya

   「chase you」 
BRoomer
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
27,654
Location
/人◕‿‿◕人\ FABULOUS Max!
NNID
ShayaJP
I almost legally am blind, yes.

And arr yes you did vote for adum.
Still, voting for no lynch definitely was attention seeking. I haven't seen the part of your motivation that explains why you would do that (this early) without just doing a typical unvote; please point me to it.
 

Red Arremer

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
11,437
Location
Vienna
Alright, then here we go:

Currently, I don't find anyone too suspicious. Rajam is just being a nood and as for Pierce, while his superstrong desire to go to EoT is strange, I wouldn't say it was suspicious - for now at least.
I'm not "messing with you". I think that the evidence is not enough to point towards a suspect. Seriously, it's *******Day 1.
I said TWICE - in both the original explanation and the second explanation - that I am not finding anyone to be suspicious as of now.

This might change. [...]

More likely than not, a premature lynch will cripple town because we lose a power role. We don't know how many mafia members there are. You have that mathematical fetish, don't you? Just calculate our chances to hit scum in Day 1 - without any evidence.
If you think being active and saying "Hey guys, I don't think that it's helpful if we lynch prematurely based around stupid crap, so I'll just vote no lynch until something else comes up" is scummy, then I have no idea what is WRONG WITH YOU.
Ignoring me repeating saying MULTIPLE TIMES that I had a REASON to vote for No Lynch (which promptly was changed anyway) and accusing me that I "just wanted to distract" is absolutely NOT helpful. It's just as OMGUS as me going against you is now. Seriously, stop being a ****** and start reading.
I had. Pierce. But he doesn't seem all too suspicious to me now. Hence I voted no lynch. I REPEAT FOR THE FIFTH TIME:
The voting for no lynch expressed my stance of that there is nobody who's actually suspicious enough to vote for. That's what I was saying the whole time.
 

Shaya

   「chase you」 
BRoomer
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
27,654
Location
/人◕‿‿◕人\ FABULOUS Max!
NNID
ShayaJP
I haven't seen the part of your motivation that explains why you would do that ... without just doing a typical unvote;
A typical unvote would have had the exact same effect. However a vote for No Lynch is in itself a PROPER vote. To top it off you decided to vote adum and start a tangent of "he is scummyscummyscummyscumscum" or whatever just because he called it into question.
 

Red Arremer

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
11,437
Location
Vienna
A typical unvote however would've not expressed my stance of "I think we shouldn't lynch anyone currently".

As for the vote on adumbrodeus: I voted him cause he were riding on me "trying to distract" from useful discussion, while HE was the one who distracted in the first place because HE was the one who was riding on that no lynch-vote and did NOT read my MULTIPLE explanations.
 

Omni

You can't break those cuffs.
BRoomer
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
11,635
Location
Maryland
I would disagree, last game I was being largely inactive (along with all my other games cause of class). this game I'm being more than active, I just guess omni isn't handling the pressure well and is resorting to omgus tactics...
unvote
Vote: Chibo

this game you're being active, but now you're intentionally being useless/unhelpful. this is probably worse than your previous activity since its counterproductive. i've never said there's anything scummy about your behavior but your intentionally distracting from the game by being uncooperative. tell me: why would you purposely exhibit anti-town properties after announcing in the beginning of the game:

I'm game, I'm around this time. BBRs gonna feel the wrath of a real scumhuntin Chibo. Schools not gonna keep me down this time.
right. appreciating you being game and im sure all of us are trembling from the wrath of your scumhunting.

guys chill out on the time traveling talk. seriously, that's enough

@Pierce: sure uh, i'll probably just vote to go to w/e was next after 600 AD in the storyline. i think it was 65 billion but i'll look it up and that's where we can go. i'm also holding my time travel vote until the last moment so prevent mafia/anyone from forcing tie so you're going to have to vote before me

@Scamp: way to disappear randomly. i want a lot more out of you.

so my choice for today's play is between chibo, rajam, and adumbrodeus at the moment.
- chibo out of explained reasons
- rajam out of lurking
- adumbrodeus just because i find his play awkward compared to last game.

where are you guys suspicions landing at the moment
 

adumbrodeus

Smash Legend
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Messages
11,321
Location
Tri-state area
Kept forgetting this, with little to no information, storyline seems like the best course.

@everyone: Would you guys be willing to follow the story (ignoring repeats), seeing as flavor-wise, that would give us a chance to explore every period. It states that lavos has a contigency plan so I doubt that it's a good idea to stick with one period.

Also, could we stay in present till tomorrow so we'd get a chance to see what present does?




A typical unvote however would've not expressed my stance of "I think we shouldn't lynch anyone currently".

As for the vote on adumbrodeus: I voted him cause he were riding on me "trying to distract" from useful discussion, while HE was the one who distracted in the first place because HE was the one who was riding on that no lynch-vote and did NOT read my MULTIPLE explanations.
Taking somebody to task for distracting from useful discussion IS useful discussion.


It's called "scumhunting".


The fact is, none of your explanations satisfactorily addressed why you did something that you KNEW was gonna attract considerable attention and detract from scumhunting.

Your "explanation" justified an "unvote" not a "no lynch".
 

adumbrodeus

Smash Legend
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Messages
11,321
Location
Tri-state area
so my choice for today's play is between chibo, rajam, and adumbrodeus at the moment.
- chibo out of explained reasons
- rajam out of lurking
- adumbrodeus just because i find his play awkward compared to last game.

where are you guys suspicions landing at the moment
Ackward... because I'm scumhunting?


I'm playing similarly to what I was at the end of the last game, calling out people that I thought were suspicious as soon as I noticed it.


aka, I'm trying to avoid being stupid and useless like I was last game.
 

Red Arremer

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
11,437
Location
Vienna
Yea, whatever. You are the one keeping bringing it up over and over again. It should've stayed with a question and an answer at most, but you kept on saying "omg u r scumm with tat cuz u b distractin!!" all the time, and I was saying "lol, read up again, but here again for you: [reason]." And then you again were "ok but u r still scumm with tat cuz u b distractin!!".
That's basically all our "discussion" was about. It should've ended with me saying that the vote for No Lynch expressed my stance. Whether or not you feel this is "enough", I don't care. Hell I don't even care if you lynch me, lol. I just try to play this game, you're the one who's all over the place with "omg u scumm u!"
 

adumbrodeus

Smash Legend
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Messages
11,321
Location
Tri-state area
Yea, whatever. You are the one keeping bringing it up over and over again. It should've stayed with a question and an answer at most, but you kept on saying "omg u r scumm with tat cuz u b distractin!!" all the time, and I was saying "lol, read up again, but here again for you: [reason]." And then you again were "ok but u r still scumm with tat cuz u b distractin!!".
That's basically all our "discussion" was about. It should've ended with me saying that the vote for No Lynch expressed my stance. Whether or not you feel this is "enough", I don't care. Hell I don't even care if you lynch me, lol. I just try to play this game, you're the one who's all over the place with "omg u scumm u!"
Bringing up that somebody is acting scummy is scumhunting, as I said before... And no, it shouldn't have, because you didn't give a legit reason for a "no lynch" vs. a regular unvote, or you know, a reason why you weren't scumhunting. So I'm left with the reason you gave initially, that somebody was gonna jump on it. The ad hominem and the "scummy mcscumscum" whatever that was, just suggests that you're not handeling pressure well, which makes your case worse.



I don't think I'm getting any new info out of you however, so that's enough for now.


Unvote
Vote: ChiboSempai




Chibo, why are you being so purposefully obtuse?
 

Red Arremer

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
11,437
Location
Vienna
Ackward... because I'm scumhunting?


I'm playing similarly to what I was at the end of the last game, calling out people that I thought were suspicious as soon as I noticed it.


aka, I'm trying to avoid being stupid and useless like I was last game.
Fact is, though, you ARE being as stupid and useless like you were in the last game currently.

Alright, so maybe my No Lynch vote was too much - so? I explained my reasoning. It might've been a mistake, but you know what? Nobody is able to play perfectly. Neither are you. And you're not playing well with drawing out this one little thing that I explained already into something ominously huge.

a reason why you weren't scumhunting.
Hey there, I have Day 1 on the phone. He wants me to tell you you're playing like a moron when you think that Day 1 is the best occasion for scumhunting.

So I'm left with the reason you gave initially, that somebody was gonna jump on it.
I wanted to edit that post originally for it to say "I know adumbrodeus is going to jump on it". But since there are other players I don't know about how they play I went with "someone". Seriously, yea. I knew someone was going to say something about me voting No Lynch without any explanation. So? What's so scummy about that?

The ad hominem and the "scummy mcscumscum" whatever that was, just suggests that you're not handeling pressure well, which makes your case worse.
The ad hominem wasn't coming from your "pressure", it came from your blindness and me feeling like a broken record. The scummyscum thing was just being silly.

I mean, seriously, lmao. You think you can profile me into detail by just a couple of posts. You don't know how I'm handling pressure because your single vote out of being a blind bat wasn't pressure like at all.
 

Omni

You can't break those cuffs.
BRoomer
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
11,635
Location
Maryland
joel, u mad?

hes right tho. the small amount of pressure he did put on you is making ur post sound a bit silly. do u find anyone suspicious besides the person who's seems to find you suspicious?
 

Red Arremer

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
11,437
Location
Vienna
I'm Doctor Insano, of course I'm mad, nyahaha!

To answer your question:
Noone really I would think is extremely suspicious to put a vote on.

I think Rajam is just being a noob, so I doubt he's inactive to lay low.

For those I'm having an eye on, it would be
- Pierce, as his desire to go to EoT by Day 3 and after that "avoiding it like the plague" seems incredibly fishy to me.
- DMG and Scamp for laying very low for my tastes. DMG made only what... 1 or 2 posts until now. Scamp said he was going for a more aggressive tactic this game, but I don't see him being aggressive at all.
- Chibo for the reasons you mentioned. Though he might just be Chibo.
 

EdreesesPieces

Smash Bros Before Hos
BRoomer
Joined
Mar 15, 2004
Messages
7,680
Location
confirmed, sending supplies.
NNID
EdreesesPieces
Unvote
Vote: Marc


Where the heck are you? You are extreeeemeely quiet. Who do you consider (if anyone) scummy at this point? No need to chip in on all the time traveling business though, that's really a waste of more time and energy.

Guys, I'm up for the "go with the time periods the game goes" idea. I'm down for 600 AD as well, then after that we can go to the future. Still, I'll save my vote when I can confirm we won't have a tie before I throw it out there.

My top suspicions after getting up to date with this thread.

1) Adumbrodeus. Seriously, I'm do not understand your play this time around, whereas last game, I was actually defending you the whole time because you felt legit to me as town. Not feeling you this time.

2) Rajaam. While he is new, he's really really awkward about it. His newbieness isn't as innocent as Darkmusician's was last game.

3) Marc. Seriously, quiet as a feather.
 

EdreesesPieces

Smash Bros Before Hos
BRoomer
Joined
Mar 15, 2004
Messages
7,680
Location
confirmed, sending supplies.
NNID
EdreesesPieces
Wow, I totally forgot DMG even existed. That's not good. Scamp didn't seem scummy, but he is suddenly inactive again. DMG's a lot more quiet though...and i don't find his contributions with much substance.
 

adumbrodeus

Smash Legend
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Messages
11,321
Location
Tri-state area
Unvote
Vote: Marc


Where the heck are you? You are extreeeemeely quiet. Who do you consider (if anyone) scummy at this point? No need to chip in on all the time traveling business though, that's really a waste of more time and energy.

Guys, I'm up for the "go with the time periods the game goes" idea. I'm down for 600 AD as well, then after that we can go to the future. Still, I'll save my vote when I can confirm we won't have a tie before I throw it out there.

My top suspicions after getting up to date with this thread.

1) Adumbrodeus. Seriously, I'm do not understand your play this time around, whereas last game, I was actually defending you the whole time because you felt legit to me as town. Not feeling you this time.

2) Rajaam. While he is new, he's really really awkward about it. His newbieness isn't as innocent as Darkmusician's was last game.

3) Marc. Seriously, quiet as a feather.
....

Marc is co-modding.


*sigh*

What's with this bad metagaming now, I'm playing pretty much exactly like I was playing at the end of last game, and aggressively scumhunting.


The reason my play is different now is because I played like a ****ing dumb*** during the early game, and the only thing I could do to protect myself from that was the gambit I played.


I'm not making the same mistake again, from now on, aggressive scumhunting period.



So yeah, it's different, but that's cause I learned how to actually play the game reasonably well. Why would I make the same mistake that cost me the game again?
 

Overswarm

is laughing at you
Joined
May 4, 2005
Messages
21,181
vote Marc

lynch him!!!!



But srsly, he's a co-mod. Your vote doesn't count, but your unvote does. =P
 

EdreesesPieces

Smash Bros Before Hos
BRoomer
Joined
Mar 15, 2004
Messages
7,680
Location
confirmed, sending supplies.
NNID
EdreesesPieces
Yes yes, I definitely need 5 people to tell me. lol. I thought he posted a few times and it didn't seem moddy at all. Maybe I shouldn't be posting here on 2 hours of sleep.

Fair enough, let's bring DMG out of the shadow's instead Vote: DMG
 

Marc

Relic of the Past
BRoomer
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Messages
16,284
Location
The Netherlands
Editing a player's post and posting a votecount isn't moddy? >=/ I was mildly surprised when Scamp told me I could live past Day 1, but you take the cake.
 

Omni

You can't break those cuffs.
BRoomer
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
11,635
Location
Maryland
Point taken @ adumbrodeus. I'll just have to adjust my view on you for the time being. So I'm okay at the moment with you.

Interesting that Edrees practically took my same suspects and added a mod. HRM!

I totally forgot about DMG as well. I'm going to have to look over his posts again and see if I think he's fake scumhunting. At this point, I'm pretty confident that scum is taking their time and not making any contributions of merit.
 

ShadowLink84

Smash Hero
Joined
Sep 12, 2005
Messages
9,007
Location
Middle of nowhere. Myrtle Beach
THIS!!!! QFT
I already explained my reasons.

Repeating myself over and over and over is rather tiresome.
Might I remind you that going to EoT being bad for town is still just flavor talk, and we're not even sure of this. The reason why it's better to explore early game ISN'T BECAUSE THE TIMEZONE ITSELF MIGHT BE DANGEROUS, BUT BECAUSE THE METHOD OF TRAVELING THERE IS TRICKY TO EXECUTE. PLEASE DON'T MAKE ME HAVE TO EXPLAIN THIS AGAIN.
might I remind youthat this is Chrono Trigger Mafia.

So flavor does have an influence on the mechanics of the game.
unless of course you can tell me that of the original versions of Mafia involved time traveling.

THIS IS FLAVOR THEORY.
This is Chrono Trigger Mafia!

THIS IS FLAVOR THEORY, and because THE METHOD OF TRAVELLING HERE IS DIFFICULT TO EXECUTE, AND MUCH HARDER/MORE DANGEROUS LATER IN THE GAME.
MORE DANGEROUS STILL MEANS ITS DANGEROUS!
IF YOU ALREADY KNOW THIS WHY WERE YOU SO **** SET ON GOING THERE!?
DO YOU KNOW SOMETHING THAT WE DON'T?
WHY DO YOU WANT TO GO TO AN OBVIOUSLY DANGEROUS PLACE?

You know its dangerous because you keep saying that its more dangerous late game than it is early game.

Everyone else is dealing with If's, I base my idea aroudnt he fact that it requires disunity in order to arrive there as well as the mechnanics of the game being based around CT.

you on the other hand,say with certainty that the era is dangerous, even more dangerous in late game, so why go there at all?
What are your reasons for wanting to go to a dangerous place?



THIS IS FLAVOR THEORY
THIS IS CHRONO TRIGGER MAFIA

Idjit.

(omfg, I'm going to pull my hair out, and I honestly think I'm getting trolled in a game of Mafia)
The problem is you are acting like it is STANDARD mafia.
The fact that Overswarm said that even dead characters can come back to life OBVIOUSLY MEANS THAT THIS ISNT STANDARD MAFIA.


If Town decides to travel to EoT, and then we deliberately cast our votes to tie, he who breaks this plan is not town. Someone else besides Shadowlink call me out if this honestly doesn't make sense to you. Actually, if this DOES make sense you, please say it does, so I KNOW I'm not going crazy.
The problem is this...
If everyone votes togo to EOT (by voting for different time periods).

It is an OBVIOUS bait. No one would go against town unity in such a stupidly obvious manner.
The second is that going to EOT , which you yourself also acknowledge is potentially dangerous, is also bad in itself.

So not only is it a terrible bait, it also sends us to a place which you yourself acknowledge as dangerous.


As I've said before, I PREFER to go there SOONER RATHER THAN LATER, IF we choose to go there at all. Furthermore, I AM AGAINST THE IDEA OF LEAVING A TIME ZONE COMPLETELY UNEXPLORED.
HEY GUYS LETS GO TO SOMETHING THAT WE ALL CONSIDER A DANGEROUS TIMEZONE NOW RATHER THAN LATER BECAUSE WE NEED TO EXPLORE IT!

Is anyone else thinking this sounds ludicrous?
TO explore it just because its there, even though it is potentially dangerous?
Let alone use that potentially dangerous era as bait!?

Why not 12,000 B.C?


WE DON'T KNOW THIS! WE HAVE NO IDEA WHAT'S THERE. IT COULD BE AUTO-GAME LOSS, OR TOWN COULD GAIN POWERFUL MAGICS, I DON'T KNOW ANYMORE THAN YOU DO. WE CAN EITHER CHOOSE TO AVOID IT, OR GO THERE. IF WE ARE GOING TO GO THERE, THEN NOW, AT OUR PEAK STRENGTH, IS BETTER THAN LATER, SINCE VOTING TO GO THERE REQUIRES A DIFFERENT TYPE OF VOTE, THAT CAN BE EASILY DISRUPTED. AND PEOPLE SEEM CAUGHT UP ON FLAVOR THAT EOT IS BAD.
EXCEPT THE FUNCTION OF EOT WAS TO LIMIT THE NUMBER OF PARTY MEMBERS!
IT IS WHERE THE EXTRA MEMBERS WERE FORCED TO STAY!
CONSIDERING THE FACT THAT FLAVOR IS RATHER INCREDIBLY INTEGRATED INTO THIS VERSION OF MAFIA, AND WE KNOW THAT EOT REQUIRES THE EQUIVALENT OF DISUNITY, WHY GO THERE AT ALL!?

You're the only one that's so **** adamant about exploring what is potentially the most dangerous time period (wellif you can call it that).


Well, had I not said anything, I do not think I would have realized that there were multiple players who wish to NEVER go to end of time, and Omni would still be under the impression that EoT locked up time-travel.
Most of the player's figured out that flavor was integrated into the game more so tan the last Mafia game.

Let alone the method by which they voted in terms of time travel would certainly have dictated whether or not they wanted to go to the EoT.


I never thought it did, elsewise I wouldn't have wanted to explore the region, and OBVIOUSLY not have wanted to explore it first. Had this been the case, even suggesting it would have been putting a neon sign over my head flashing, "Scum, scum, scum."
Except for the fact it may STILL RESTRICT town.
We outnumber Mafia, so why goto a place that more than likely will hurt town?

Numerically wise its a stupid idea no matter what time you go.

THIS IS FLAVOR THEORY.
This is CT MAFIA>

Also, if this is true, it could also still be GOOD for town. The ability to limit someone's play if they are suspected to be mafia is fairly good. However, I didn't suggest this even though the thought occurred to me previously because THIS IS FLAVOR THEORY.
This is a STUPID idea and here is why.

Town outnumbers Mafia

This is a fact of every Mafia game, Town will always have a significant numerical difference to Mafia. They will ALWAYS have more members than Mafia, its how the game lasts so long to begin with.

So if we go to EoT, and lets say it randomly restricts players.
More than likely, it's going to HIT town.
Just because of the fact that Town will always outnumber Mafia.

Which would give scum an advantage.
Why would you even WANT to explore such a region?

I think you'd have to be SCUM to think this was a bad idea, lol
Isn't there a role called the village idiot or something?
Where they try to get themselves lynched?

I wouldn't have to elaborate to say that this is a failure at elaboration. If you would?
...

*pops a CT cartridge in Pierce's DS*

-.-
 

ShadowLink84

Smash Hero
Joined
Sep 12, 2005
Messages
9,007
Location
Middle of nowhere. Myrtle Beach
**** THIS COMP!

Wanted to finish tha tpost.

Anyway, 2300A.D. is the most beneficial to heroes.

Lavos is gone, his spawn are leaving.
Chrono comes back to life.
You gain the Epoch.
you gain the sunstone.
You gain Robo.
You learn of Lavos
You also restart life on the planet.
 

Omni

You can't break those cuffs.
BRoomer
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
11,635
Location
Maryland
stfu, SL.

stop assuming that the events that occurred in the video game are actually going to occur in this mafia game.

who do you think is scum
 
Top Bottom