ShadowLink84
Smash Hero
I'll get back to your post later Pierce. I have to head out to help a friend out.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Why do you think this exactly? And why specifically force a claim?ok im thinking we should start pushing towards a lynch and forcing a claim. i can only guess Lavos would get a safe nameclaim but i doubt he'd get a safe role claim
rajam, shadowlink, or dmg imo.
I caught that about Pierce, and it's interesting, but I don't know what to think of it so I didn't comment on it.I don't understand why Pierce suggested, way back when, to let Omni decide where to go but not let him go where he clearly wants to go. Anyone other than Omni catch this?
Finally, the worst offender so far is Chibo IMO. At least he's been kind of active recently, but he's clearly not in the game as much as he should be. Most of the time he quotes things and replies to them individually and not within the context of the game. I also like how he's advertising another game in this game and that he just unvoted without even voting first. Oy.
I didn't throw away my connection. The things I said were: 1. I want to vote for a time period that's already been voted for. 2. I don't want to vote with Rajam since at the time I found him the scummiest and had my normal vote on him, so that left SL left and nothing else. 3. I expressed my distaste of some of SL's later posts.Today I have yet to see true "scum-tells";
In reality one of the few things we have to go on is the flavour that is imbued into the game's mechanics; that is voting for a time line. This obviously has left Rajam, ShadowLink and Chibo as having the main notoriety of the day. As I've already mentioned, Chibo has casually "thrown away" his connection abruptly after shadowlink posted his reasoning (planned perhaps?).
Joel' argument started after he had been voted for by Adumbrodeus I believe.
I really don't like the way Rajam has been playing.
He wants to keep the inactives alive? Why?
It is stuff like that which causes scum pounces like last game.
Why did you answer SL's question to Rajam?I didn't say I want to keep inactives alive.
Both of them are of a different creed to last game's inactives as well.
One seems to be too awkward being new at the game to understand what he should be posting (even though I may be over defending him for this),
the other is being from what i've seen thus far, normal scamp.
Omni pointed out the flaw in this well, just quoting this to remind me and add it to my thoughts on Shaya.I said omni is my top suspect?
If that's where you want to go and are willing to lay down the first vote, why won't you straight up? Why do you feel the need to have a promised backing?To be completely honest, I would also like to go to 600 A.D. for storyline purposes, and that creates three of us. If I get 2 more posts of agreement (looking at Omni, Edrees, Adam here), then I will cast the first vote for 600 A.D. AND I EXPECT ANYONE WHO'S TOWN TO COMPLY WITH THIS MAJORITY OR POST A SOLID REASON FOR STOPPING PROGRESS.
SOC: Whatever Omni chooses that isn't 600 A.D. or 2300 A.D.. The time that comes after 600 A.D. in the CT Storyline.
I feel like an idiot for asking this, but what's SOC and POC?PoC: 600 A.D.
Still Voting For Shadowlink
II agree, and why are people following the story line like this? We're not playing Chrono Trigger, we're playing Chrono Trigger Mafia. Do you think OS would make it so the optimal thing to do would be told to us? Obv not. Also not to mention, we know Lavos' exists right now. When the game starts, you don't know about Lavos, so why are you (everyone going story wise) starting from the beginning?Don't need to add any more spice to this game. There's already so much flavor!
Hey guess what, scum to us is town, so they can help agree for us to get there. What's wrong if someone as a townie feels that we shouldn't go to EoT and makes it so we dont? Are they working with everyone else? Not exactly, but are they being scummy? imo no. They aren't not working with town, they aren't working with everyone else, town + scum.To answer your question, if town agrees to split the vote down the center, so that we can deliberately end up in EoT, and there is a player who deliberately breaks this tie, so we don't end up there, that player is not working with town, obviously.
What do you have against me? Why are you portraying me in a negative way? Explain more.That makes you just as bad as Chibo was when he followed my vote just because of Rajam.
Marle falls through a time portal 1000A.D
Chrono follows her to 600 A.D and rescues.
They return to 1000 A.D where Chrono is arrested. They escape and go to 2300 A.D.
They then go to the End of Time (unintentionally).
Last time I answered this I said something like "I'm not answering this", but now that I understand the game a little more, I see no reason to look scummy on purpose, so I'll answer now:FOS: Rajam
Care to explain then why you would vote for a specific time zone so preemptively? I assume everyone in the BR is pretty smart, and we all figured out that it would be relatively suspicious, as well as using a resource improperly to vote for a new timezone before anything else had happened, since you can't change your vote.
Shadowlink, don't think your vote slipped under my suspicions radar, ESPECIALLY since it was right after Omni was getting on Rajam's case, and had no clear explanation other than a very shallow, "We should go somewhere because it's better than not." I'm interested in hearing something a little less shallow from you as well.
guessing u may have overlooked my last post @ chibo since it came at the end of the last page so requoting to answer your questionwaiting until the very last second until starting a lynch process on a player isn't always the best idea. if said player, for example, makes a doc/protection claim with a character that fits the script without receiving any counterclaims it would not be wise to continue forth with that person's lynch.
the point of applying pressure and pushing a person to L-2 or L-1 (two or one votes before lynched) is to get info out of them. if they seem to be the most likely candidate then it will be obvious that they should claim before judgment is officially passed.
with that said, i think we need to push for a specific person's lynch soon rather than later just in case their name/roleclaim becomes somewhat problematic.
I am cool with skipping 600 A.D. and going to the next timeline that ISN'T EoT thus I'll choose 65 Billion (Prehistoric) for the end of this round. This will be my vote for the end of this Day.
OVERSWARM/MARC, a votecount would be nice. A nice one every 40 pages at the top of the page like most games do would be extremely helpful.
my choices are still between rajam, shadowlink, and chibo.
i like pierce.
i dont think i like shaya.
i kinda like adam.
scamp is neutral.
i dont think i like dmg.
edrees is neutral.
i dont think i like .joel.
if i had to push someone to L-1 asap i think that person would be ShadowLink and im pretty sure i have a vote on him currently. we'll see by the next vote count.
Context reference:I didn't throw away my connection. The things I said were: 1. I want to vote for a time period that's already been voted for. 2. I don't want to vote with Rajam since at the time I found him the scummiest and had my normal vote on him, so that left SL left and nothing else. 3. I expressed my distaste of some of SL's later posts.
I never expressed a connection with SL in the first place.
I said I would agree with this "deal". Prehistoric has no votes atm, and 2300AD has 2. Three of us (You, Pierce, myself) are willing to do this. Scamp inferred he was (as in fine with 600AD, but not sure about his thoughts on prehistoric).I am cool with skipping 600 A.D. and going to the next timeline that ISN'T EoT thus I'll choose 65 Billion (Prehistoric) for the end of this round. This will be my vote for the end of this Day.
Quoting this just in case (yes I am the one who wants to be replaced).Replacement requested; if anyone would like to replace in let me know.
Correct, I have no intentions of going to EoT, ever. Unless something tell us it could be good for Town of course. But currently, every thing points out that EoT is a punishment zone. Also, any other time seems ok to me, nothing (besides pure flavor) suggests an specific time is better than other by now.After reading Edreeses post, I changed my mind. I was backing off the end of time because I didn't want to be accused of being Mafia for pushing it too hard, but now I'm curious.
We all decided that it would be beneficial to go somewhere, but NO ONE wants to go to the end of time except me?
I gave very solid reasons on why I wanted to visit EoT first. ALL REASONS for wanting to visit any time zone are flavor based, but I gave Shaya a non-flavor based reason why visiting EoT now is better than later. Besides Omni's "story progression logic" (which obviously has a fair possibility of being a cover) this is the ONLY reason that isn't flavor based to go anywhere.
Now, aside from me I notice two factions. A large group says that we shouldn't go to EoT because it might be a punishment zone. They feel that Overswarm's use of the word "stuck" in relation to being in the EoT, suggests that it's rather unpleasant. Another group is open to go anywhere, or has yet to comment.
Let's address that first group. Since you feel like the EoT is a punishment zone, and you don't want to check it out early game, where it is surely safer as we have strength in numbers, then I presume you have no intention of going to the EoT in the entire game?
I expect an answer to that from everyone.
lol what a bunch of flavor, as many of your posts. This is also a reason to why I FOS'ed you before.the primary reason I think the End of Time is possibly a punishment zone, is because of how the End of Time functioned.
it was the place in which your characters remained while three others ran about through time.
Meaning that more than likely, it might restrict various individuals.
Now, for those who are all "maybe its best to stay."
There is NO era in which you CANNOT fight Lavos outside of 2300 A.D.
Black Omen remember?
Appearing all the way up to 2300 A.D (where it becomes pointless because of the fact Lavos ALREADY destroyed the planet, and Queen Zeal states this.)
Even more, you can fight Lavos in 1000 A.D right off the bat with Chrono and Marle.
So keep in mind that the whole idea of saying "staying in a time period is a safe idea" actually may hurt us more, since no matter what era you were in, the threat of Lavos was ALWAYS present (outside 2300 A.D where he left his weak *** spawn).
Let alone EOT is the WORST possible place in so many ways.
Voteierce7D
Why should we go to EOT which is directly connected to Lavos, and is also the only era that has no benefits for town?
The only one's that benefit would be independent, so why are you so very intent on going there?
Again, you proceeded under the basis "EoT = Likely Bad for Town" in your advice to visit EoT sooner than later, and we're not forced to go there ever. Your advice therefore is mediocre (I insist that the best advice by far would have been never go to EoT unless some new info suggest we should), and personally I find it suspicious.I love it how you posted a whole bunch of flavor, then threw an easy vote on me, without answering my question, and asking me a question which my entire post was based around.
We do NOT know the benefits of going to EoT, and it's a whole new type of flavor to even suggest that independents would be the only people who would benefit. We don't know that EoT is any different than any other era. We DO know that it's tricky to GET their, because we have to tie votes. We do know that ATTEMPTING to get there in late game is FAR RISKIER than doing it now. I have explained this VERY, VERY clearly, and NO ONE has yet to refute the actual logic in this. The only "counter arguments" I have received are based on FLAVOR, which you are using a lot of, and is normally considered very scummy. Not only are you using flavor, but you're BLINDLY GUESSING FLAVOR AND STATING IT AS FACT.
LMAO! I was about to say, "Madu Rajam is LEAKING because that's TOO much of an improvement in gameplay for him to have come to those conclusions alone."who are u getting to play mafia for you rajam
wait, explain to this to me againHe did say he would take things slow.
He said so multiple times that he's behind current posters as he decided he would be extremely meticulous; and from outside mafia he seems to be well astute.
Even though everything up to "independents" was somewhat a repeat of things said in the past. The point he brings up does add more to our suspicions of SL...
I'm saying it's a possibility. Whilst he may be getting help from others (which may be possible), he would/should have known that it's against the rules to do so.are u suggesting his entire style of play/talk has improved because he slowed down as opposed to him moving too fast in the past?
Actually that wasn't in my thought process. I thought Omni was suggesting Rajam was breaking rules. It's a bit silly that I didn't consider this.There is a decent chance that the other mafia teammates are PMing him posts on what he should say. One of the few actual signs of scumtell (communication with other players) that I've seen.
I'm sure because of this Pierce is already going to have some thought bias for Edrees, Shaya, Omni, and Scamp all because they agree with him and are ready to follow in his footsteps. Now what if one of them is scum? Not good not good.Ed, you down to back the vote of prehistoric with me, Shaya, Omni, Scamp?