no he was never considered sakurai just said he was coolThen maybe Geno? Wasn't he planned to be in at some point?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
no he was never considered sakurai just said he was coolThen maybe Geno? Wasn't he planned to be in at some point?
Blastoise was planned to be a Pokémon for Pokémon trainer, so I'll go with that thenno he was never considered sakurai just said he was cool
It's funny, when I got off the site yesterday, I realized I was somewhat conflating Protoman and Zero.I guess I just don't see why Zero would be chosen as Mega Man echo where they would have to make several liberties (adjusting his height, almost fully disregarding the saber, giving him moves that he's never used, etc) when they could just make Proto Man the MM echo and it would be way easier and not have to have any liberties taken.
-His AT already includes a lot of moves (all of them tbh) that are unique to him and not Mega Man, which shows he was given official recognition. Let alone if he was an actual fighter.It's not that I disagree with this idea, as much as the fact that honoring the characters doesn't always matter most in Smash. It's seemingly more important in the DLC, but let's not pretend some big liberties aren't taken with many in the roster.
They may not be echoes now, but they clearly were the same thing when they were made. They were quick additions made heavily reusing assetts, who were all made quickly, with a surplus of time in development that could not have been utilized to create even a single other character. The 'clones' (which I recall as just a fanmade term, anyway- I could be wrong) from Melee are the same as the echoes of today. I don't really see how this can be argued, other than that those characters evolved to be different.
A MMX fan can 'call me out' all they want. I'm not saying Zero isn't different in his games, nor that he ideally wouldn't be different. However, that it isn't inherent in him coming in. This could be argued for almost any of the echoes that do exist (save M4rth, and potentially Dark Pit)- Daisy doesn't float, Dark Samus uses all sorts of various attacks, Ken is more variant to Ryu than Dr Mario is from Mario.... ultimately it's just a term used for marketing, and can clearly apply in a lot of situations.
Dixie would best be represented by being very different from Diddy- they certainly have enough that is different. Yet, she also could work if based on Diddy, with some tweaks.
There is also the idea that sometimes, characters from the same series just tend to play a little more similarly, to give a feeling of a shared universe. Sure, Isabelle and Villager don't actually play similarly on a competitive level, and Lucas and Ness have different evolved playstyles- but there is a reason that fans called them semi-clones at the start, because their qualities are easily related.
I did see you make the AT argument for Zero, and I see how well that turned out for Dark Samus' unique moves.-His AT already includes a lot of moves (all of them tbh) that are unique to him and not Mega Man, which shows he was given official recognition. Let alone if he was an actual fighter.
-Moveset that's easy to copy-paste from MvC, so making him an echo would just be for the sake of it considering ease of implementation. Most characters have an entirely made up moveset yet this wouldn't be the case for Zero.
-Every single 3rd party fighter has something unique about them bar Richter, who's probably the least recognizable out of the bunch. And even then both SImon and him share moves to the point Sakurai said something among the lines of ''it's hard to know who's echo-ing who''.
-Body proportions are a thing, and considering it's an official rule, then that alone should just shut down every line of thought about echoes having different shapes or sizes.
-None of the Melee clones are currently classified echoes, not even Dr. Mario and Pichu yet they still feel Ken-like enough to be. Doesn't change the fact that they aren't echoes which is what you dismissed as if it didn't matter.
-Dixie doesn't have a tail so that alone should discard her as an echo
-Unlike Shadow, you can't put just out the ''he plays like Mega Man in some games'' card.
-This last point is more speculative I'll admit, but it's possible that the 3rd party companies have to give their approval in order to be able use the characters in the first place. This may also be the reason why we don't have another Sonic rep (Shadow being an echo doesn't fit him) or why Sakurai works with 3rd party devs most of the time towards the creation of a fighter's moveset.
All this is telling me is that you don't wanna believe the facts and just stick to your headcanon/logic/ignorance whatever you may call it. It essentially boils down to ''I want Zero as an echo and nothing more therefore it must be true, screw all points that tell me otherwise'', since I've yet to see any convincing argument on your part.
As I've said multiple times before, my intention isn't to be hostile in this site but I'll 100% call out BS when I see it just as I did back in SmashFAQs, and some of your comments kinda rub me the wrong way.
Considering Deoxys is a Pokemon of note, and its very unique playstyle- I'd have been quite down. However, it was probably more complicated than the Brawl mechanics would have allowed.Deoxys missing out on Brawl comes to mind; it was a fairly popular request among Gen 3 Pokémon
thats assuming sakurai went for a form change mechanicConsidering Deoxys is a Pokemon of note, and its very unique playstyle- I'd have been quite down. However, it was probably more complicated than the Brawl mechanics would have allowed.
i honestly dont think so Sega only uses Sonic, Tails and eggman nowadays!If Eggman doesn't get in as CP11, I'm afraid it'll be the end of the road for him. Tails, Knuckles, Shadow, or Metal all seem much more likely for the next game's base roster.
Iwata was part of the Mach Rider team too.Balloon Fighter; a honorary addition to Iwata, reasonable for Brawl, Smash 4 and Ultimate
Mach Rider; as above, minus the Iwata reasonings
only 2 out of 10 had movies based on themNon-Latest Gen Pokemon unless your name is Pikachu your spot in Smash is 100% dependent on your generation having just released and your being a poster child of either the game or the associated movie. It's bull****.
"poster child of either the game or the associated movie"only 2 out of 10 had movies based on them
but that’s a colossal assumption based that holds no real water. Inceneroar had no such thing in the anime, his presence in the movies was far from what you would call a poster child and his time in the main series was brief as well. Jigglypuff was included as a clone as was pichu. There are far less Pokemon who may have gotten in due to the anime than there ones we know probably weren’t"poster child of either the game or the associated movie"
Sakurai claims that he picked Greninja because he looked cool, but given that after his inclusion in Smash 4 Greninja had this whole anime presence (that lead to a movie or some ****) it's fair to say that he was thoroughly "convinced" of how "cool" Greninja looks.
Just for you, I'll beat up my own argument. Pokemon Trainer evades all of these rules as the one and true legitimate Pokemon rep, whose gameplay in Smash is supposed to be emblematic of Pokemon's own gameplay. Brawl truly was composed divergent.
Subscribe.Isaac; even would've been a good addition since Melee I feel, and all games after. I still feel he might still got a chance for the last DLC character therefore.
If they ever add Toad, they could keep Peach's neutral special, but have her use Toadsworth instead.Dixie and Toad feel like Nintendo's biggest absences.
I think if Peach's moveset were made differently, Toad would definitely have been a newcomer in Melee or Brawl.
Banjo probably would have been in the series a lot earlier and we'd probably have Gruntilda or Mumbo by now if Rare stayed with Nintendo.
I’d say Conker and (obviously) Banjo would be a given.If they ever add Toad, they could keep Peach's neutral special, but have her use Toadsworth instead.
And yeah, it's too bad Rare was bought out by Microsoft. Had they stayed with Nintendo, I imagine we'd have at least three reps for the company (not sure if all of them would be from Banjo-Kazooie).
The only problem having with Conker is that Nintendo didn't embrace mature games until the Wii U era, so he probably wouldn't make it in until Ultimate. Still, I think Joanna would be an obvious pick for Brawl, given how well Perfect Dark was received. I'm pretty sure it was in Metacritic's top 10 highest rated games list around that time.I’d say Conker and Banjo would be a given.
Perhaps Fulgore or Joanna Dark would eventually be added too either by having their series still relevant or with the aid of fan demand.
That’s not really true, Nintendo really supported both Perfect Dark and specially Conker’s Bad Fur Day back in the day. Hell at E3 2000 they even opened a separate booth full of zany Conker merch just to advertise the game.The only problem having with Conker is that Nintendo didn't embrace mature games until the Wii U era, so he probably wouldn't make it in until Ultimate. Still, I think Joanna would be an obvious pick for Brawl, given how well Perfect Dark was received. I'm pretty sure it was in Metacritic's top 10 highest rated games list around that time.
Sorry about the misconception. I could've sworn they were against them at one point, but that could be choked up to poor memory.That’s not really true, Nintendo really supported both Perfect Dark and specially Conker’s Bad Fur Day back in the day. Hell at E3 2000 they even opened a separate booth full of zany Conker merch just to advertise the game.
They also published Eternal Darkness in 2002 (an M-rated horror game) and didn’t seem to have any issue with that action whatsoever.
No problem. They actually kinda were during the SNES era, which is why this exists:Sorry about the misconception. I could've sworn they were against them at one point, but that could be choked up to poor memory.
ok by missed the boat they mean characters who you think missed their chance to get as in characters they arent getting in. so characters whove since been added and characters who were cut dont count. also geno was not the most request character in the brawl days. that was sonicMy list:
Smash 64: Bowser, because he was meant to be in Smash, but due to technical difficulties in Hardware, he was cut and didn't appear I smash 64 until Melee. Darn, I wish Bowser should be included as Character in Smash 64 in Smash Bros. Allstars Collection.
Brawl: Geno, he was most requested character in Smash and Sakurai didn't had a time to make him as Fighter, but he was Mii Costume in SSB4 and SSBU.
SSB4: Ice Climbers and Wolf:
Ice Climbers: When Sakurai considered them, he had a Issue that They would break the Hardware limitations of 3DS. Speaking of Wii U, Sakurai didn't want them to be exclusive on SSB Wii U.
The Yoshi series has gotten games in the 2010s and Kamek is a major character in the Mario series, but sadly, I can't see him being added anytime soon.Even going as far back as Brawl, Issac would have been a pretty logical pick, as well as less popular characters such as Kamek due to the recent resurgence of the Yoshi's Island series and the like.
This is the sort of thing I mean when I say Kamek is in a weird state at the moment. He'd have made most sense to be added during the Wii era, given his relatively high number of appearances, and before then wouldn't have been logical given the Mario newcomers were, well, Bowser and Peach. Thing is, though, by Sm4sh, I feel like Kamek to be honest wasn't as popular as, say, Rosalina, so I see why she was added given her recent appearances. Bowser JR, also, was pretty logical as a more "modern" Mario rep. Kamek, though? Whilst he was still getting games and was still "major," there were other characters better known than him, and perhaps more problematically, more requested. Sakurai's inbox was probably flooded with "GIVE US PURPLE MAN."The Yoshi series has gotten games in the 2010s and Kamek is a major character in the Mario series, but sadly, I can't see him being added anytime soon.
isabelle is popular as well. Her inclusion was not promotionalI actually also think that there were tons of characters that could have worked really well as base-roster characters for Ultimate, but the limited number of newcomers, well... sort of limited that. Whilst I'm happy with who we got - after all, Simon, K. Rool and Ridley were massive fan picks, Inkling was one of Smash's only ever actual "shoo-ins" and then Isabelle and Incineroar made sense as "recent promotions" of sorts. Echoes I sort of see as generally pretty logical anyways, so Daisy, Dark Samus and Chrom were fair to be honest. Ken specifically just made a lot of sense.
For instance, a character from ARMS could have worked well as base-roster, really (after all, it's not like it's the first time Nintendo would promote a game with a character, looking at Roy here) and potentially other characters from late Wii U games and early Switch titles. Good examples of these are Astral Chain, the Wonderful 101, Captain Toad, or remakes like Wind Waker HD and the like. Even looking at later Wii games, there's potential.
The same sort of applies to DS games in Sm4sh, because there was a lot of potential. I'd probably say series like Scribblenauts, WarioWare, Rhythm Heaven, Advance Wars and even Chrono Trigger sort of... lost their chances after not making it into Sm4sh. Sure, Scribblenauts existed after the DS iterations, but was nowhere near as popular as it used to be - WarioWare did originate before then, but the DS felt like the era when it was at its height, and even with Advance Wars getting some love now, it's at the wrong time given the period of Smash Ultimate we're in now, being the late stages. Chrono Trigger is a little less related, but given the surprising success of the DS remake, I feel it's a logical pick too.
Even going as far back as Brawl, Issac would have been a pretty logical pick, as well as less popular characters such as Kamek due to the recent resurgence of the Yoshi's Island series and the like.
Overall, good examples are, well, basically any side/single notable appearance character from a Zelda game in history, such as Midna, Skull Kid and Ghirahim are pretty much dead in the water, and soon enough the Champions will probably be in the same predicament. Basically any Pokemon from a previous generation that aren't in Smash now are nearly impossible to get in over a newer pick, so characters like Deoxys who might work incredibly well are, well... incredibly unlikely, now. Hope you enjoy Sirfetched. Basically any Fire Emblem character except those of the most recent game, or possibly Lyn, are at best wishful thinking. Hell, even the Mario series seems unlikely to get too many newcomers after Pirahna Plant.
My last point here is basically any "retro rep." Specifically, 1st parties. As hard as it is to say, who cares about Excitebike Rider, or Takamaru, or Sukapon, when they could have characters like Ryu Hayabusa, or Bill Rizer, or Jason and SOPHIA, and an endless list of 3rd parties? After Sm4sh, most of these 1st party retro reps are... somewhat pointless, in the grand scheme of things. Sure, if Smash were to return to just 1st party one day, they'd be possible, but I see it as unlikely - characters like Duck Hunt Duo were added because the game was so wildly popular, and most other 1st party retro titles aside from perhaps Excitebike don't have that modern recognition or sales numbers... hence why, as much as it pains me to say it, series like Joy Mech Fight will probably never get their chance to be playable.
Yeah, Brawl was probably the best chance he had at getting in.This is the sort of thing I mean when I say Kamek is in a weird state at the moment. He'd have made most sense to be added during the Wii era, given his relatively high number of appearances, and before then wouldn't have been logical given the Mario newcomers were, well, Bowser and Peach. Thing is, though, by Sm4sh, I feel like Kamek to be honest wasn't as popular as, say, Rosalina, so I see why she was added given her recent appearances. Bowser JR, also, was pretty logical as a more "modern" Mario rep. Kamek, though? Whilst he was still getting games and was still "major," there were other characters better known than him, and perhaps more problematically, more requested. Sakurai's inbox was probably flooded with "GIVE US PURPLE MAN."
Smash Ultimate, given a limited number of newcomers, it would have made sense to even add Kamek at all, and as a DLC pick, compared to who we do have, I don't think he makes sense. It's a weird situation, because he's been "relevant" all along, but just isn't relevant enough - and yes, I actually think Plant was a pretty good choice as a pre-order bonus, as opposed to say Kamek.