Obviously Toon Link is better than Link, but tons of people are listing bad reasons.
Someone said Link is bad at midrange as opposed to Toon Link, Link is good midrange. I've also seen like 20 times that, "Tink's bombs are better," without listing any reasons. This just seems like a big misconception. Link gets bomb fair that kills at the same percent as Tink's, same bombslide stuff, same traps, recovery buffs, OOS options, and many other combos. You
cannot claim Link gets anything less than amazing from his bombs, and I've already seen in this thread that he gets nothing from bombs... He gets fair followers from Boomerang as well.
Wait, superior combo game?
While toon link can convert a combo off of nearly every hit confirm he gets from his projectiles...what can link do to compete again?
It's not at all ridiculous to say Link's combo game is at least almost as good as Toon Link's. Jab 1-2-smash (which is important), great utilt combos even when compared to Toon Link's (and off a throw, whereas Toon Link lacks a combo throw), same fair follow ups off bombs, etc.
Toon Link is clearly the better character but it isn't high tier Tink vs low tier Link. Toon Link is probably around upper mid while Link is around lower mid to upper low. The difference is not huge, and comparisons between the two characters go past just mobility (despite mobility being the biggest difference competitively between the two), it extends to Link's better edge guarding, midrange, etc.
It's also kind of frustrating seeing, "this character is simply not good," following up a post that gives no reasons or gives bad reasons. Look at what the character has and it's clear it doesn't come down to him being, "simply not good," when he has legitimately good things going for him, Europeans who do well with him...
He has a sucky disadvantage state, which sets Toon Link apart. That, mobility, and Toon Link's kill throw are probably three of the biggest factors in Toon Link being clearly better.