Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
not sure if trolling or lack of reading comprehension.Delux Im pretty sure youre interpreting the standards to fit your argument, the only interpretation that matters are the reviewers. A more likely explanation, and from what I can see, is that the standards either a) arent clear enough or b)were misinterpreted by the applicants.
Its very common for anyone that's felt theyve been wronged to automatically assume the person or thing they were wronged by is being illogical, especially when their reaction comes soon after theyve been wronged. But everyone involved in the decision has given a rational explanation. Honestly it probably wouldve been best had everyone that was denied and had an issue to either privately appeal or waited a few days before pointing fingers at the reviewers, the process, or the BBR itself. Coming to the conclusion that the opposite party(ies) is being illogical should always be the last judgement, not the first.
Chair quite honestly there was no need to grandstand and criticize others if you were confident in what you said.
MRM wtf are you doing. Your pointless criticisims/attacks dont deserve to be here and deserve the world's biggest facepalm.
You really should learn to read before you post.I don't get why illmatic and p1 don't understand that all they have to do is not get infractions till the next app period to help them get in...
Fair enough, I'll withhold any more logic based judgments on my part until more time passes. Although I would reiterate, I would make the argument that my dissent is more so based off of the applications of others. I've already said that based on objective standards, my post has been mentioned as to why I was not admitted. I've sent in a private appeal as an explanation as to why it wasn't meant as a sign of disrespect, although I acknowledge how it can be seen as such.Delux Im pretty sure youre interpreting the standards to fit your argument, the only interpretation that matters are the reviewers. A more likely explanation, and from what I can see, is that the standards either a) arent clear enough or b)were misinterpreted by the applicants.
Its very common for anyone that's felt theyve been wronged to automatically assume the person or thing they were wronged by is being illogical, especially when their reaction comes soon after theyve been wronged. But everyone involved in the decision has given a rational explanation. Honestly it probably wouldve been best had everyone that was denied and had an issue to either privately appeal or waited a few days before pointing fingers at the reviewers, the process, or the BBR itself. Coming to the conclusion that the opposite party(ies) is being illogical should always be the last judgement, not the first
I stopped talking about it a few pages ago.It seems like beating a dead horse at this point...you've given your criticisms and your worries they've been recognized and acknowledged and you've even been told how to correct your personal situation.
We've already covered this.... you sure you read those pages?To be more on topic...If you're going to use the job application analogy then you could very well relate that to the infraction problem...all jobs ask on resumes if you have been indited, been to jail, or done any illegal substances in the last x amount of time. So shouldn't that be a pre-app notification in the OP? Or a question?
Ok.Illi,
if from today onwards you did not receive an infraction, in 6 months time I would go
'wow, he has strived to become a lot more mature, he does have a huge infraction history, but it's no longer a consistent pattern of behaviour'.
Actually, my state of mind isn't "Hey I have 5 infractions, can't troll anymore for 2 weeks oh well". It's more like "Hey, I have 5 infractions, damn I can't troll or I'll be hanned, better stop."P1, in a nutshell, beyond your infraction history, which is ultimately not too problematic, you're personified as immature in your day to day interactions on smashboards. I've had similar opinions of multiple people who have eventually gotten into the BBR because I can contrast their improvement (hell, 3 years ago people were kids, some of those kids are now adults, the differences are often quite vast). You have a strong resume and you were on the cusp of acceptance.
People have a tendency to want game the infraction system in place on smashboards. I would consider that, in of itself, an extremely immature state of mind. And it's very easy to spot said people, usually within their last 5-10 posts. "Oh, I'm only 3 points today, I can flame this guy and then not be an idiot for 2 weeks and I'll be fine". We don't want people like that in the BBR. Ideally, someone in the brawl back room would be close to a respectable candidate for moderation.
That's exactly what they DON'T want, because they are practically the same thing.Actually, my state of mind isn't "Hey I have 5 infractions, can't troll anymore for 2 weeks oh well". It's more like "Hey, I have 5 infractions, damn I can't troll or I'll be hanned, better stop."
He does. It's ********I actually speak like that in person, no thesaurus necessary. Ask Stealth Raptor who is lurking lol
The root of the two is 'I don't consider whether or not my behaviour on smashboards is inappropriate or not and if it isn't, I still post it'. What I 'quoted' was an example and I consider the two you listed as the same.One is "Man, I better cheat the system, can't wait to get back to trolling"
the other is "Hey, I better watch myself here and be more careful about getting them"
I don't know if this was meant to be funny or notWe met at Pound 5. We actually didn't say too much because I was mortified that I was going to lose to Ganon using Ice Climbers. And it was 4am.
But really, it isn't a social. I don't mod this place (thank god lol), but really, can we try to keep the posts on-topic? The discussion was going pretty well imo, a lot more civil overall than things tend to be around these parts.Are you serious? LMAO
And Espy/DeLux, this isn't a social - I will hand out infractions.