Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Well you can nominate me... but I won't be most useful until I get back of course.. unless I have videos and such =Pany serious panelist nominations? i think yakal would be an okay choice
will is also a good choice (LOL ELEGANT.PANELISTS)
any others?
If you don't do this, someone less capable will. Good work sion.[COLLAPSE="sion's stuff"]manuel, not to be mean or anything, but it feels like you're putting a lot of emphasis on him beating you and placing 5th. i'd really like to hear why you think edgeluca should be above bwmachoke. is it 'cause he beat you once? he did well once? iirc rotunda 2.0 was stacked as hell. it even had a mini round robin as a tie breaker. if brennan beat you and tim, there should be no reason as to why he didn't make it out of that.
and then he shows his incredible consistency losing to evan and booshk, two people that he has beaten before and should've beaten, given his incredible wins against you and tim.
we don't give spots on "maybes" and "what ifs", we give spots to people deserving of them. my question is, do you really want to give brennan the 9th spot, knowing that his consistency is shaky and is potentially slumping? i'm done arguing, manuel. it's up to you who you want on the 9th/10th spot. consistent matt or one shot wonder brennan.
and i'm honestly tired of posts like these. you state that you're unconvinced, then put up no coherent argument? then you give me crap like this:
it really boggles the mind sometimes.
think about it this way: was matt's performance disappointing the last two tournaments? hell no. was yours? you even stated it yourself. yes it was.
your losses weren't legit. you beat players of higher caliber than booshk and evan. there's no reason why you should be losing to players like that if you can freely say "i deserve 9th because i beat **** players like manuel and tim, but my various losses to worse people are legit". if you honestly think you deserve the 9th spot over matt after doing worse than he has, then please continue to say that you deserve it. otherwise, step down and do better next time.
i seriously need another(more) panelist(s). i'm tired of laying down the hammer and chewing people out.[/COLLAPSE]
ehh not really, I just know how thankless a job it can be at times. A little word of encouragement is niceTiep is a Sion fan boy lol...
best pee arr ever guyz.yo wtf what about me, :D
also, in no particular order cept for adam.. LOL jks
Ryan
Tony
John
Tiep
Eric
Manuel
Sion
Roby
Tim
Adam
Our pr *****, lets get this back up
I think Icy would be a fantastic panelist when he comes. Next time we need to update, he'll be around, I think.manuel, not to be mean or anything, but it feels like you're putting a lot of emphasis on him beating you and placing 5th. i'd really like to hear why you think edgeluca should be above bwmachoke. is it 'cause he beat you once? he did well once? iirc rotunda 2.0 was stacked as hell. it even had a mini round robin as a tie breaker. if brennan beat you and tim, there should be no reason as to why he didn't make it out of that.
and then he shows his incredible consistency losing to evan and booshk, two people that he has beaten before and should've beaten, given his incredible wins against you and tim.
we don't give spots on "maybes" and "what ifs", we give spots to people deserving of them. my question is, do you really want to give brennan the 9th spot, knowing that his consistency is shaky and is potentially slumping? i'm done arguing, manuel. it's up to you who you want on the 9th/10th spot. consistent matt or one shot wonder brennan.
and i'm honestly tired of posts like these. you state that you're unconvinced, then put up no coherent argument? then you give me crap like this:
it really boggles the mind sometimes.
think about it this way: was matt's performance disappointing the last two tournaments? hell no. was yours? you even stated it yourself. yes it was.
your losses weren't legit. you beat players of higher caliber than booshk and evan. there's no reason why you should be losing to players like that if you can freely say "i deserve 9th because i beat **** players like manuel and tim, but my various losses to worse people are legit". if you honestly think you deserve the 9th spot over matt after doing worse than he has, then please continue to say that you deserve it. otherwise, step down and do better next time.
i seriously need another(more) panelist(s). i'm tired of laying down the hammer and chewing people out.
rotunda 1.0
5.Brennan
didn't enter iirc
2.0
5.bwmat
didnt make bracket.brennan
sfu62
7.bwmat - lost to silent wolf and boosk
9.brennan - lost to booshk and evan
all i know