Malakandra
Smash Lord
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2020
- Messages
- 1,264
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
That appears to be four, to be nitpicky.We have three investigatives: Fonti, Bessie, Laser, Boom
Ryker originally, then second day it was pretty popular, I'd claim some responsibility for that.Checking: Who pushed for mass claim?
You just double vote? Theres nothing else that you do? No other part of the double vote?Also looking at this chart I'm wondering why they said Shadow voter instead. The heck.
You really are scared, huh.You think it is realistic that scum have an item steal power when there is exactly one item in the whole game?
Your role makes zero sense if Bessie is scum. You should be totally confident that she is town but you are trying to keep enough doubt that Red will just go gung-ho and shoot her still. Or she is your scummate but you are worried Red will shoot her regardless of our advice and you are trying to distance. Either way this attitude is unnatural.
Wolf.And why did you insist I claim before you when you had no result to claim on me?
I'd say I don't count, I only had a 1-shot weak investigation.Fonti doesn't count. She just copies off of other people like me in middle school
I don't think I understand what you mean here. Do you think Bessie is scum but really receives parity cop results?This is combined with the fact that a. I expect some sort of information scum role as a red herring
Your plan is scary to Ryker if he's scum. If I'm scum it would only force me to kill Ryker. There's no world where you get shot in this plan.
This actually tracks.I now get to check Bessie (or anyone else if they claimed an investigative role).
Day 1 started with Ryker claiming mason and Malak being an innocent child. Many of us were suspicious of Laserguy, Malak claimed he had proof of the guys flavor claim, laser claimed tracker, we still lynched him.bamf
I exist. Nice to see you all.
The fudge is going on, in your own words, all of you, please.
MalakRemind me, who did Wam jail?
Yes, with my nonconsensual mason crumbs.Day 1 started with Ryker claiming mason and Malak being an innocent child. Many of us were suspicious of Laserguy, Malak claimed he had proof of the guys flavor claim, laser claimed tracker, we still lynched him.
day 2 started with no night kill, we started to mass claim, Malak admitted he lied about knowing Laser’s flavor and it was a gambit to get mafia to kill him, Eido was revealed as Rykers mason partner, Xivii gave Red Ryu a gun that will allow him to day kill, so we’re getting two kills today. Frozen and red Ryu claimed extremely similar roles. We have way too many powerful roles claimed for town for them to all be true. Ryker sexually molested me.
I expected something more like a scum!tracker (like, I'd check them, realize the person is a tracker, and wrongly clear them). Bessie could be a scum parity cop, but only if there are third parties in the game (the ability then 1. allows her to fool me or Laser and get herself falsely cleared and 2. let's the scumteam hunts down the third party.) However, I think that's unlikely, which is why I'm advocating let her live rn while I check her tonight and she confirms the masons. If all the confirmations work out, we have a fantastic town core of Mala/Ryker/Eido/Bessie, which Mala being unable to die before Vicarin, and that's game winning. If it doesn't work out, then you or Bessie are a wolf and we get to kill whichever of you is outed. And if any town is genuinely worried about me being a wolf, well, I can't lie to get Bessie killed without outing myself. And I think Bessie and I are fairly blatantly not aligned, but ymmv there.I'd say I don't count, I only had a 1-shot weak investigation.
I don't think I understand what you mean here. Do you think Bessie is scum but really receives parity cop results?
Your plan is scary to Ryker if he's scum. If I'm scum it would only force me to kill Ryker. There's no world where you get shot in this plan.
This actually tracks.
That's what I thought. And he said it blocks all actions? So it's just Vic or Wam, yeah?Malak
Wam jailed Mala, thinks he was roleblocked because it should have stopped Vic's vanillaizer shot.Remind me, who did Wam jail?
No. Because Wam could have been (and probably was) roleblocked.That's what I thought. And he said it blocks all actions? So it's just Vic or Wam, yeah?
Problem is, if we lose T!Bessie, that means we lose a result.Gotta say, we have a LOT of claimed protection. Damn.
Bessie not claiming the format of her results and having Fontisian target her would be good for checking some stuff.
Only half the time. The other half of the time you are being ambiguous. You are hedging your bets.I'm the one who's been telling Red to hold off shooting her specifically because of my role.
I'm thinking.
I can confirm Bessie's ability, but not, I think who she targets. I need to consult with Chaco on the details.
I find it very likely that you and Bessie are aligned, but shooting Bessie first would be idiotic.Ah, Bessie.
Mmm. We could just kill her?
Day 1: Ryker claims Mason. Yeet was down to Laser/Wam/Bessie. Laser claimed tracker, Wam claimed jailor, Bessie refused to claim. We killed Laser.bamf
I exist. Nice to see you all.
The fudge is going on, in your own words, all of you, please.
I think Bessie's claimed parity cop target of Mala doesn't make much sense. I think in her place where I want to hit a town to work with confirmed info I still always, always target Ryker first, because that gives the possibility of catching the "mason" in a lie. Since we know scum tried to shoot Mala (since no one else could have possibly been saved, barring like third party actions or something) and since I was implying I had info, she was probably afraid I had watched Mala and caught her targeting him last Night, hence her claim.Only half the time. The other half of the time you are being ambiguous. You are hedging your bets.
I said "should we shoot bessie?" you said:
I find it very likely that you and Bessie are aligned, but shooting Bessie first would be idiotic.