No Pictochat makes me really sad. Nowhere to take Meta Knight now. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Frown :( :("
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
... Sorry Alex, but I hope you can understand why I'm coming back to the topic after being linked to this.Umm I have a compromise for BPC and all those upset with stage bans and Metaknight
![]()
With Brawl+ dead, I feel that Brawl Minus should be given as much attention as Project:M, and more attention than Smash 64 as a side event. BPC is the leader behind the project, and he could easily craft the appropriate ruleset for this event.
As if 1 upping BPC and -1ing us is helping..Why not give everybody 2 bans?
Also, +1 to everything BPC has said. I really hate willful ignorance and stupidity. I guess the game and the community deserve each other.
Does a majority actually want it off?Imo the majority of people wanting ps2 off is a legit reason to have it off LOL
Legitimate question!Does a majority actually want it off?
Sure thing, it just happens. Now tell me. What would you pinpoint as the cause? Is it that most people don't like "liberal" (read: more than 6 stages) stagelists? Is it because conservative stagelists are simply more competitive? Or is it because most of the most influential TOs in the most important regions are absolute conservatives? The first is usually not the case until you go up to a ridiculous level, the second is demonstrably false... You know what? I think it's kind of dishonest to claim that "it just happens" when you're instrumental in it happening. Same as it would be if, say, Inui made that claim. It does not "just happen". You make it happen.6:54:17 AM Axel Strife: conservative rulesets happened in melee and will happen in brawl its just something that happens
No kidding. My observation is that there are three sides here who are more than "indifferent":I'm serious about that question, it seems more like Alex saying it's off over people wanting it off.
Now this I guarantee will drive away the international audience. Germany views Pictochat on the same level as Warioware, and not without reason... Nobody here seen the vid of the falco sideBing to the ledge only to get caught by the diagonal line that spawned during his sideB? Or ZamZ CGing his way across the random transformations? Or that GFs match where a diddy got gimped by the diagonal line? Seriously, I support the decision to remove Picto; that stage is ********.Should add Picto to CP List.
It will pop up for less than 15 second I beleive, can you except players to remember this for an 8 minute match all the time and always work on avoiding it when they have no clue if it will pop up?Why would Falco try and sweetspot the ledge if he knows line might pops there?
Zamz's video is a terrible example, but anyways, from beginning you're supposed to know Picto is a very good stage for DDD.... :/
Really, knowledge and awareness works almost like magic in Picto.
-It is dangerous just for one second while it is being drawn.It will pop up for less than 15 second I beleive, can you except players to remember this for an 8 minute match all the time and always work on avoiding it when they have no clue if it will pop up?
Because people use to not be awared of stage behavior, they just run straight/away form the opponent, but never pay attention to the stage.Oddly enough this actually affect a lot more matches than even I realized at first, nothing about legality but that line has ticked people off. :/
Kyo, don't even bother arguing about it. Even if this stage did not have such issues, I can guarantee that a fairly large portion of the internationals would cancel their plans to come to APEX because of the stage. And at that point, it's not even questionable-when a rule would severely harm attendance at your tournament, then it's a bad idea.
Thats silly. I highly doubt nearly any international player that truly wanted to come to Apex would cancel because of one stage.Kyo, don't even bother arguing about it. Even if this stage did not have such issues, I can guarantee that a fairly large portion of the internationals would cancel their plans to come to APEX because of the stage. And at that point, it's not even questionable-when a rule would severely harm attendance at your tournament, then it's a bad idea.
...Unlike PS2.
BPC.>75m
>Doesn't make matchups one-sided
Assuming I show up, that offer applies to any stage in BBR 3.0 that is banned here other than Pictochat. :V
Stages that are banned from APEX but legal in the BBR list. IF I show. Which is fairly questionable. I'd have to pay my own way, which is a hell of a lot of money.
...I'd also add Onett and RF to that list if you want.
...I'd also add Onett and RF to that list if you want.
Onett and RF
HELLZ YEAH. You better show.RUMBLE FALLS
record the setBPC.
If you show, $5 MM bo5 banned stages only (minus Picto) vs. my Game and Watch? Go ahead and take any stages out of the banned stages, or even make your own stagelist for it. I'll pretty much agree to any stagelist provided it's not Flat+Plat only.
Old news is really old.Seriously BPC, this is where you have to shut up.
No offense,but you're being a huge ***** about nothing right now.
Rules are rules.Apex 2012 thread should have a sticky even if it doesn't follow the BBR-RC ruleset.
It is quite disgusting to want to force tournament organizers to do what a bunch of people on a forum say.