If Nairo mained Zelda exclusively and (somehow) got the same exact results that he does now, why wouldn't we put Zelda as high / top tier? In theory (what we think), Zelda's bad, but if what actually is happening contradicts that, who's wrong? The game or us?This is a really good post. The fact of the matter is, many characters have potential. But some characters need to be piloted by a top tier echelon player to extract enough out of that character to compete with some of the other characters in this game.
Let’s be real, just using this as an example, if Nairo mained Zelda from the beginning of the release of smash 4 up until now, we would have a much higher opinion of Zelda overall than we do now. Now does that mean we would think Zelda is good? No, it’s obvious she is an extremely flawed character. Obviously we would know that Nairos skill is the reason for him doing well, not because Zelda is some secret high tier. But the small bits of potential she possesses would be on full display for us to watch at a high caliber level of play, and therefore we would know Zelda “is capable” of doing well. I’m kind of rambling I hope that makes sense lol
"X makes "character" look better than he/she is" doesn't make much sense to me. How do we know what the character is "supposed " to do results wise? On paper and in practice are two different things.
Instead of saying it, I think we should say "X is the pinnacle of "characters" meta right now".