Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I don't know how you can include Ryu in the "maybe you'll get to shine some more". If anything, Locus getting top 8 with Ryu at an event of this calibre is a huge win for a character that is often shafted as overrated/not actually top tier.Major winners of Civil War: ,,
You were close, maybe next time you'll get to shine some more:,,,,,
I personally do not consider that as much of a major win as Link's, DK's or Rosalina's because Ryu has been able to reach 9th at a couple tournament, and Locus has shown to be a very competent player already. His run was on the better side of things, yes, but it isn't as much of an impressive feat as the 4 other characters simply because it doesn't really act as a breakout result for Ryu when you look deeper into what Locus has done to reach 7th, at least in my opinion.I don't know how you can include Ryu in the "maybe you'll get to shine some more". If anything, Locus getting top 8 with Ryu at an event of this calibre is a huge win for a character that is often shafted as overrated/not actually top tier.
I understand that and use it for most characters but I believe there are few exceptions to that rule. Characters like Ike are just straight up bad matchups for him because they have everything he hates. Link has everything he hates but with projectile shenanagainsIt's a personal rule of mine not to put Lucario on matchup charts, because his design doesn't lend itself to matchup numbers when the game can literally turn in a single hit.
IMO Link/Lucario is even. Link doesn't have Ike's CQC game, especially the frame 4 jabs. Once Lucario breaks the zoning, he's more dangerous to Link than Ike. Lucario's aura spheres have one big advantage over Link's projectiles: they can kill. Link has to play carefully not to get frame trapped. Getting off the ledge is just hell. Aura charge>Usmash is a potent landing and kill option.I understand that and use it for most characters but I believe there are few exceptions to that rule. Characters like Ike are just straight up bad matchups for him because they have everything he hates. Link has everything he hates but with projectile shenanagains
He got rocked by Rosa. It actually RE-CONFIRMS that Ryu has matches that he cannot get over with pure skill alone.I don't know how you can include Ryu in the "maybe you'll get to shine some more". If anything, Locus getting top 8 with Ryu at an event of this calibre is a huge win for a character that is often shafted as overrated/not actually top tier.
Most of Europe, which used to fairly consistently run 3 stock, is moving towards a 2 stock format right now. I don't think 3 stock has much of a future if not even Europe wants to use it anymore.IMO 3 stock is better than 2. SSB4 is very prone to upsets and quick deaths.
Most of the UK for example has started to switch to 2 stocks as opposed to 3, just to chip into this comment a bit.Most of Europe, which used to fairly consistently run 3 stock, is moving towards a 2 stock format right now. I don't think 3 stock has much of a future if not even Europe wants to use it anymore.
So who would you say were the biggest losers?I can't believe people are seriously arguing Falcon or Link to be the biggest winners of Civil War - that title undisputedly belongs to Rosalina. Wins the most stacked tournament in smash 4 history, places in top 5 twice, in top 12 three times and no less than 4 times in top 16. That alone is insane but let's not forget that the guy who won a major category 3 tournament a week ago with Rosalina is not the same person who won Civil War - Rosalina won two major tournaments within a week through two different players. That achievement alone can hardly be overstated. Now keep in mind that the people Kirihara lost to are the same people that placed 1st and 2nd respectively - one of these sets was a ditto and the other was against Fatality who is known to give Rosalina players a hard time [remember when he 3-0'd dabuz?]. For all we know Kirihara could've the whole thing just as much had he not happened to run into two of his four most dangerous opponents [the third and fourth being Nairo and Ito]. And also keep in mind that falln wasn't necessarily a player people would've expected to place as high as 13th, not in a tournament this stacked.
Fatality's and T's performances are incredible in their own right but if the history of smash 4 teaches us one thing then it's that consistency should be given more attention to than anything else. That's why the title of second biggest winner of Civil War has to go to ZSS for me. To be the only other character that appears twice within top 12 already invalidates the tier list not even a full month after its release - I don't even wanna know why people put such an obvious top 5 character outside of top 10. There is no legitimate justification for such a blatant error, when the best players and smartest heads of the community come together to make a tier list then something like that should never happen.
Even if Link and Falcon don't manage to replicate their performances at Civil War in the future they still did something to improve their reputation. But at the same time I must urge for people not to go overboards with the assumptions. For all the great things T managed to pull off we should not gloss over the fact that his winner bracket run had him play against Fox [NAKAT], Lucario [Tsu-], Mewtwo [Abadango] and Captain Falcon [Fatality]. Not exactly a death-bracket for Link! Hell, I could see an appropriately skilled Doctor Mario possibly making his way through that bracket. None of these aren't manageable. And was it ever in question that T has the skill to do it? At least by the time he nearly knocked out Ally at Frostbite it should've been obvious that he does - and if you actively follow the japanese scene you probably knew even earlier than that.
I find Fatality's bracket run even more impressive - he beat Komorikiri, Nairo and Kirihara and then double 3-0d CaptainZack and T back to back. Was this a breakthrough tournament for Falcon [Pichi has already won a big tournament in Japan where he beat T in GF - go figure!]? Was this Fatality's ultimate breakthrough as a player? Was he lucky this time facing generally favorable opponents like Kirihara or has he often been unlucky in the past running into people like Larry a couple of times that knocked him out early? That is something we'll see over time, for now I'm just happy for Fatality to do this well. I also heard he beat Trela which I've always thought to be a pretty lame matchup to get.
We've often talked about bracket luck but what we haven't talked about are the odds of actually getting affected by bracket luck in smash 4 - since the roster is so big you're just somewhat likely by default to dodge the absolute worst, most grimy matchups and run into something more manageable. Shulk may get "invalidated" by Fox but as long as he doesn't actually run into a competent Fox -and that's actually a fairly unlikely constellation anyway- he's still mostly limited by how far his player can take him. It's not like Brawl where as Diddy you have to have your **** tanked by Snake beyond 200% and pull off a clutch win only to run into two Ice Climbers back to back after that. That's something that gives a lot of characters a chance to do well [in addition to smash 4 just being fairly well balanced] even if they're not considered very good. Even Link is rightfully regarded a pretty mediocre character and he can still do well.
Ryu is another winner showing up once in top 8, twice in top 24 and some amazing wins under his belt: Samsora, Shuton and Nairo have all lost to him. Not something that a lot of people saw coming. The downward trend for Ryu has probably stopped for now.
Luigi and Shulk are minor winners, both placing 2x 33rd. That's a great achievement for characters of their standards, especially Shulk. With two players doing this well for each character respectively it's fairly safe to assume that it's not just a fluke either. Congrats to the people that contributed towards pushing these characters, I know the Shulk community put an assload of work into their character to get him somewhere.
Fox and Sheik have remained consistent in a crazy tournament full of upsets. Not only have both characters once against found their way into the top 12 but they also did something about their reputation of being carried by their few flagship players with not too much behind it to back it up. Even with Void and Kameme underperforming by their own standards Sheik managed to get 6 different players into top 50. Fox has 5 entries in top 50 all of which are solo except NAKAT.
Finally, Bayonetta had a very strong showing getting a 4th, a 13th and a 25th place. Nothing unexpected but when is she going to prove that she is the best character in the game? I've heard it too many times now.
DK is an abomination.
This ^Other things I enjoyed about Civil War:
- 4 instances of Rosalina in top 16: Dabuz, Kirihara, falln and Abadango.
- The overall character variety; Link!
- The upsets; the writer that wrote this script needs a goddamn medal.
- A fair bit of Lucina secondary usage.
- Samsora at 17th with Peach. Also cleanly beating Fatality 2-0 and Elegant 3-1 in the salty suite.
- ESAM's Samus.
- ESAM's Samus.
- ESAM's Samus.
By FAR my favourite tournament of Smash 4 history right now, and I am sure many others feel the same.
Let's face it, when you have a character yet that can't be grabbed essentially due to Luma...That neuters 90% of the top tiers, who have grabs as the center of their gameplay (Diddy damage rack, ZSS kills,Nietono went full sheik to my Knowledge. Also can we look at the fact Rosa has won TWO majors within a single month? Remember when dabuz wanted to drop this character????
On one hand, Ganondorf beat a fairly competent Bowser, showing mostly how potent he is offstage with last stock flame choke and edgeguarding with aerials.This ^
Plus
- That crew battle being a nail biter towards the end until Komo swept it up.
- The tweets and the savagery; ZeRo going all "I'm so done right now" on Twitter
- Link in general; similar to Tsu back at Frostbite, T showed us what Link has to offer.
More broadly, I think T and Fatality proved that any character (possible bar on like Puff and Ganon) has what it takes to do well in the right hands on an international Uber-major platform.
Overall bayo did roughly what I expected her to do by the players who each play her. But in termsome of meta shift I think we are seeing a change in howhich Players are approaching neutral. Players seemless inclined to allow neutral to reset and want to push advantage harder. Outside of dabuz most of the high placing players we categorize as aggro. In an event like this that is significant I feel.I love how nobody has mentioned Mario as one of if not the biggest loser at Civil War
Also, people need to stop jumping the gun. Way too soon to say the meta is shifting to a meta revolving around strong advantage states. If anything, the meta will continue to revolve around neutral but having a strong advantage will certainly help. The most dominant character at Civil War being
Bayo's performance was slightly disappointing with Zach's 2 SD's against Fatality. I hope people don't put too much weight into that set.
Well to put things in prespective. Bayo did better at Civil War then just about every currently established top-tier character bar Rosalina and maybe ZSS.I love how nobody has mentioned Mario as one of if not the biggest loser at Civil War
Also, people need to stop jumping the gun. Way too soon to say the meta is shifting to a meta revolving around strong advantage states. If anything, the meta will continue to revolve around neutral but having a strong advantage will certainly help. The most dominant character at Civil War being Rosa also happens to have one of the best neutrals in the game. DK, Link, Ryu, and Lucario did well but these kinds of performances are not typical of these characters, especially DK, and Link. I won't be changing my mind until they reach a similar level of consistency of characters like Sheik, Diddy, Sonic, etc.
Bayo's performance was slightly disappointing with Zach's 2 SD's against Fatality. I hope people don't put too much weight into that set.
ESAM should've have went all Samus vs HIKARU, likely would have won. Pikachu can do it but Samus was the safer route.
He doesn't have any MU near that bad anymore after the Bayo nerfs (prepatch Bayo was pretty much unwinnabble against any Bayo that knows how to breathe), he still has his fair share of really bad MUs but nothing like say IC/Sheik in brawl.Let's face it, when you have a character yet that can't be grabbed essentially due to Luma...That neuters 90% of the top tiers, who have grabs as the center of their gameplay (Diddy damage rack, ZSS kills,
On one hand, Ganondorf beat a fairly competent Bowser, showing mostly how potent he is offstage with last stock flame choke and edgeguarding with aerials.
On the other hand, he received a beating worst than Videl vs Spopovich (Bizzaro vs Mars) not landing a single hit in the last game.
I'm torn on him. Leaning more towards that he's 0:100 against certain characters though.
Ok 5:95. Rage exists.
Tbf, this is Ryu's first time within top 8. Second, I wouldn't put it past Locus to study the MU and come back stronger next time. Finally... the biggest winner of this tournament is the same way, being one of the few top tiers with a STRONG counterpick. I'd say this shows Ryu has room to grow.He got rocked by Rosa. It actually RE-CONFIRMS that Ryu has matches that he cannot get over with pure skill alone.
I wonder what this means.There was a problem fetching the tweet
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCxQUNhtp50I wonder what this means.
Surely it can't be...
I might be in a minority on this but I honestly think Ganondorf does really dang well against other heavies. Like some of his better match-ups are against other heavy characters since he can exploit his advantages a lot easier than against other characters.Let's face it, when you have a character yet that can't be grabbed essentially due to Luma...That neuters 90% of the top tiers, who have grabs as the center of their gameplay (Diddy damage rack, ZSS kills,
On one hand, Ganondorf beat a fairly competent Bowser, showing mostly how potent he is offstage with last stock flame choke and edgeguarding with aerials.
On the other hand, he received a beating worst than Videl vs Spopovich (Bizzaro vs Mars) not landing a single hit in the last game.
I'm torn on him. Leaning more towards that he's 0:100 against certain characters though.
Ok 5:95. Rage exists.
This is, of course, assuming you count anywhere below 16 as "irrelevant".Looking at the results right now cloud had absolutely noone placing anywhere relevant from what i can see. I know some players werent there, (like for example Tweek who wasnt there to my knowledge) but its interesting that absolutely noone near the top end of the bracket was playing cloud
Except doubles where its the complete opposite
My apologies i didnt give it a thorough enough look before i posted, i can see komorokiri and tweek now thanks for correcting meThis is, of course, assuming you count anywhere below 16 as "irrelevant".
It was good for T. He defeated Fatality the first time somewhat solidly. But then he faced Dabuz, who promptly stole his soul, and T didn't win a game for the rest of the tourney, even in Fatality's runback with him.I didn't get to see the fatality Zach and fatality t sets. Both set counts are intriguing. Was it just a case of momentum for fatality? I thought facing fatality would be good for either t or zach.
I've never found bombsliding / glide tossing terribly useful for Link. When it comes to ATs, the order of importance is more like:it seems like Scizor had some time with T, so I wouldn't be surprised T eventually come back with the more optimized Link combos and set-ups. I never saw this man bomb toss once.
Marth, Cloud, Mario and Diddy Kong - probably in that order.So who would you say were the biggest losers?