Thor
Smash Champion
lol at saying I don't know what objective means.your ability at projection is exceptional. i agree that @ E EmptySky00 is an idiot and can't make an argument in english, but you strawman much better than he ever could.
i agree that link players should stop *****ing and use what they got, but at the end of the day 3.5 link still sucks. he's just not good. will that hold players back? yes absolutely.
none of you seem to know what "objective" means. get on that.
I already knew objective means independent of opinion/based on facts, which I said earlier and which is why 3.02 Puff > 3.5 Link is not objectively true, has not ever been objectively true, and never will be, as having a projectile may or may not be better, but the fact that you can't state it's objectively better or worse to have one means that Puff isn't objectively better. That's the only point I was making. I've also had to rant at too many people on these boards already about being bad at using that word incorrectly. In fact I've cited that definition Luis provided myself a few different times.
I haven't strawmanned a single thing he's said - EmptySky00 is deliberately taking things I said directly out of context in order to attempt to weaken my argument - I've done no such thing, but responded exactly to what he's stated. If you disagree, kindly point out what you think I'm strawmanning, so I may rectify the issue either by fixing what I did wrong or pointing out why it's not a strawman.
And yeah, playing a bad character holds people back a LITTLE, but being not-good-enough holds them back more. If someone with Professor Pro's skills played Link and sunk as much time into him as Professor Pro had into Snake, s/he'd be a top-level player [or even more time if you add in Melee Link - but I think guys like SAUS and Lootic don't have interest in PM Link despite him being better and the Melee top tiers being worse]. But when you can go to basically any video ever and find places where people could make better choices, it's clear that the blame for the loss is because the player simply wasn't good enough - they could've played better. A character causes your loss when you can't play any better than you did and you lose, otherwise it's a john because you'd rather think you're good enough to win and blame your choices at the CSS than improve. That's a pathetic mindset and is generally a great way to avoid actually improving in favor of whining, since whining is almost always easier than taking a hard look in the mirror.
EDIT: Either way, I'm outta here. This thread isn't doing anything for me in terms of advancing knowledge or having fun or w/e, and I'm not going to spend time typing these posts up, as it could be better spent playing to get better or doing homework or any number of other things.
[Tag me if you'd like to point the strawman out, I'll come back for that if you want.]
Last edited: