Youtube Memes Mafia Game Over! Town... WINS :D lolwut end scum win streak B****EZ!!!

[#HBC | Dark Horse]

gonna throw it out there - sometimes lying as town is necessary.

And this lie isn't. What good would lying about a report to get someone who might be town lynched? (Unless, of course, you're scum)

Who are your scumbuddies? If you answer, I'll give you a cookie.

 

[X1-12]

and sworddancer can you respond to my #306 please

Swiss: suspicion on th3 started when he CC'ed me as cop, then when asked about it thought what I was doing was RVS (weak explanation) it was made very clear it wasn't. Several times today he makes posts that look very much like he's been fed a line (I'll pull up quotes later)

BSL: trying to mod-meta based on the fact some role PMs were slightly different - kinda odd. He says Swiss can't be meta'd, but not sure he would believe this considering how he doesn't know Swiss very well really.

Sworddancer and Gova are both Vibe kinda reads. Swordddancer has a bit of meta on him, his posts just remind me of the few moments in halo where we were both active in the hydra and he was making posts.

 

[giraffelasergun]

never

eh I would have just either claim I investigated whoever died, or claimed guitly on kuz.

What would you do when we lynched you for being an even cop investigating on an odd night?

 

[#HBC | Dancer]

X1 I'm confused about what you want me to respond to.

Tell it to me in question form and I will answer it.

 

[X1-12]

What would you do when we lynched you for being an even cop investigating on an odd night?

hurt.


@Sword: How do you explain starting the day wanting to quicklynch Swiss (#50) and now you think he should live and you should lynch the cop.

btw anyone feel free to CC me.


Once again guys I think I've said enough so you should know why there's inconsistencies in the story, but I think some of you have missed the important bits of what I'm saying

 

[#HBC | Dancer]

Oh, well, you should already know the answer to that. Swiss caught a major inconsistency, and that complicated things greatly.

 

[X1-12]

Oh, well, you should already know the answer to that. Swiss caught a major inconsistency, and that complicated things greatly.

You wanted Swiss dead whatever though, regardless of my claim. Even if I had been proven 100% to be not cop why would that change your opinion of Swiss

 

[#HBC | Dancer]

That part was a joke, I was being sarcastic.

 

[BSL]

@Kuz I had voted Swiss because I thought x1 wasn't serious with his claim, and thus, I wasn't serious about my vote. Just wanted to clear that up.

TO get kuz to buzz off

buzz off? Kuz hadnt posted in about 50 posts...

I said already, I don't want to be directed toNight. Nor do I want to be NK'ed

why not just claim even night cop right there, and say "i know who im investigating toMorrow night, doc protect me twice."?

BSL: trying to mod-meta based on the fact some role PMs were slightly different - kinda odd. He says Swiss can't be meta'd, but not sure he would believe this considering how he doesn't know Swiss very well really.

the mod meta thing has been explained.

the swiss meta thing. youre right, i dont believe it. but whether or not i believe it isnt the point. kuz claimed that swiss is playing his normal townie game.

1) how does kuz know swiss' normal townie game?
1A) kuz has read up on some of swiss' games.
----------since kuz has read up on some of swiss' games, he shouldve noticed somewhere that swiss claims to be unmeta-able. and then there is the whole thing about how in the games kuz read, swiss was scum...

 

[X1-12]

Never thought I'd say this but BSL looking better now.

why not just claim even night cop right there, and say "i know who im investigating toMorrow night, doc protect me twice."?

Because this game is not going to have a standard cop/doc. Its a broken game which has like a really high chance that town can win by numbers just by cop claiming D1 and getting doc protected each Night. Doc may be a jailer, or there might be a roleblocker or something to stop this.

 

[BSL]

Because this game is not going to have a standard cop/doc.

k

Its a broken game which has like a really high chance that town can win by numbers just by cop claiming D1 and getting doc protected each Night.

how does this explain why you wouldnt do that?

Doc may be a jailer, or there might be a roleblocker or something to stop this.

so why ask him to protect you at all?

 

[X1-12]

Gonna suggest you think about it a little bit. I know I am normal cop. I can't rely on doc protecting me and me being able to investigate. I have to avoid NK's through other means. I asked doc to protect me so scum don't target me, regardless of if I'm being protected or not.

 

[BSL]

but this still doesnt explain why you wouldnt claim even night cop and ask for doc protection twice...

 

[X1-12]

give me a break. ToDay I asked for doc protection toNight. ToMorrow I'll ask for doc protection N2. I didn't see the need to full claim until I was asked for it.

 

[Swiss]

And what if you were a paranoid gun owner, X1? Or some other anti-visiting role.

You're practically begging doc and as such watcher and other roles to visit you. You could kill every single person that visits you.

 

[BSL]

but still, why didnt you say "i know who im investigating toMorrow night" instead of "i know who im investigating toNight"?

 

[#HBC | Dark Horse]

buzz off? Kuz hadnt posted in about 50 posts...

He keeps saying that I'm maf for jumping on the bandwagon. Divests to clear it up once and for all.

 

[BSL]

Divests?

but he hadnt said ANYTHING for like a whole page. which was like 48 hours in "meat world".

 

[#HBC | Dark Horse]

*decided.

It doesn't matter whether he's active, it's so he doesn't keep trying to bring it up.

Vote:X1

 

[BSL]

You fail to see my point.

He hadn't brought it up in a while.

(^^^ my point)

 

[#HBC | Acrostic]

I find it interesting that the th3kuzinator himself never explained why he asked me about QT. Especially when Gova stated that the QT fiasco was something that involved Swiss which only strengthens the suspicion that the two are somehow connected. There is another aspect to the QT incident that I feel is rather suspicious in light of current circumstances.

 

[#HBC | Gorf]

Err... Scratch what was previously here. I messed up .

10. th3kuzinator- (3): Sworddancer, BSL, Swiss

7. Swiss- (3): X1-12, Nabe, KevinM

1. X1-12- (1): Dark Horse

2. DarkHorse- (0)

3. GhEEb- (0)

4. KevinM- (0)

5. Acrostic- (0)

6. Gova- (0)

8. SwordDancer - (0)

9. Nabe- (0)

11. giraffeslasergun- (0)

12. BSL- (0)

13. Sir Bedevere- (0)

Strikes:

X1-12: 1

 

[#HBC | Acrostic]

@KevinM: You seem to have been pretty pretty solid in lynching Swiss as a target from the beginning, even though you didn't want to rush the lynch. The only reason why I can see benefits from a slow roll is in order to assess roles. However you have stated that you don't want to role hunt which makes it interesting as I am curious what you wanted to extrapolate from playing the day out. I am especially curious about the, "... who gives a **** if XI is a warlock, let him win the game for all I care I'm perfectly fine joint winning with an indie as long as town wins the game... " From what I've seen you've won your fair share of mafia games to know that indie roles are not necessarily tied to town winning. Putting your foot down and insisting that a Swiss lynch is interesting given the initial view point in that you were insisting for a time-out.

I don't care if Swiss is inevitably lynched today I still want to slow this roll. We have plenty of time in the day, there is no reason to hustle a lynch when we have a N0 investigation claiming he has a guilty being COUNTER claimed by a different N0 investigation claiming HE has a guilty.

Ok so I wouldn't want to role hunt at this point in the game, its not exactly town to start trying to unearth power roles. Also who gives a **** if X1 is a warlock, let him win the game for all I care I'm perfectly fine joint winning with an indie as long as town wins this game. Swiss needs to die toDay.

Swiss you say you won't have a lot of information lynching you but I think by seeing the stances we've had on all the different possibilities you are QUITE simply the best possible lynch. Vote Swiss Not moving this and firmly thing this is the best play and only possible play town should be considering at this point.

 

[#HBC | Nabe]

Sorry for my brief absence, I had unexpected v/la this weekend.

X1, please give us detail on why you're getting strikes. Is it posts starting in lowercase that are the problem?

 

[Swiss]

@ Acrostic's 341: I recently used the QT line to significant effects in a game. Anyone that played in/has read this game/others jokes about QT's, I first used it several months ago. This is similar in principal to the N0 fake cop claim which I used. They're both ways to catch people out and bypass RVS.


Bring up the other aspect which you feel is suspicious with Kuz. He can answer that.

 

[X1-12]

Sorry for my brief absence, I had unexpected v/la this weekend.

X1, please give us detail on why you're getting strikes. Is it posts starting in lowercase that are the problem?

you are wrong about the lower case thing but tbh i wouldn't worry about the strikes.

 

[#HBC | Nabe]

Never mind, don't answer that. The restriction is obvious.
Please try to pay closer attention though.

 

[#HBC | Acrostic]

Bring up the other aspect which you feel is suspicious with Kuz. He can answer that.

Hahahaha no.

 

[Swiss]

I assumed that's who you would have wanted to.

Bring it up with whomever it is most productive to bring it up with.


X1, do you have anything else to add?

 

[#HBC | Dark Horse]

You fail to see my point.

He hadn't brought it up in a while.

(^^^ my point)

lawdy, now you're switching your point.

Maybe "buzz off"weren't the right words, More of "to prove his point invalid"

Either way, his point is invalid.

 

[#HBC | Acrostic]

Sorry for my brief absence, I had unexpected v/la this weekend.

Seriously. You didn't miss much. Everyone is still bouncing back and forth about the X1/Swiss lynch.

 

[X1-12]

lawdy, now you're switching your point.

Maybe "buzz off"weren't the right words, More of "to prove his point invalid"

Either way, his point is invalid.

up,on writing this did you not realise how hypocritical it was?

Swiss what do you mean anything more to add? ToDay? Then yes, i want to hear from kev/gheb then will probably have things to respomd to.

 

[#HBC | Dark Horse]

up,on writing this did you not realise how hypocritical it was?

He claimed that was his original point. I had slightly tweaked mine (and said so).

Different situations

 

[BSL]

He claimed that was his original point. I had slightly tweaked mine (and said so).

Different situations

what was my original point, then? i'd like to know, since apparently i changed it...

 

[BSL]

but still, why didnt you say "i know who im investigating toMorrow night" instead of "i know who im investigating toNight"?

wait, wait, wait, wait, wait....

i just realized that this went unanswered. X1, answer this. you seemed to have forgotten to or not noticed the question.

 

[X1-12]

never answered? i said already, i didnt see the need to fully claim

 

[BSL]

ah, i didnt realize that was the answer to that question.

on that note, then. what made you decide to fully claim? i checked back, and it seems that all it took was a simple question.

 

[BSL]

scratch that.

 

[BSL]

i guess maybe it makes sense now.

 

[#HBC | Dark Horse]

what was my original point, then? i'd like to know, since apparently i changed it...

It seemed to be dealing with how Kuz in inactive.