#HBC | Nabe
Beneath it all, he had H-cups all along
Forgot Bed was in the game at all.
I'll remind everyone that this really needs to be an X1/Swiss scenario. X1 is claiming cop with mod-confirmed sanity and a guilty on Swiss. One of the two needs to go, with the other going D2 if need be. Kuz shouldn't be a priority until D2/D3 when this situation has already resolved itself. I'm unsure about why the people voting Kuz are coming at this situation sideways when we have this duality situation going on.
Now, here's what we know about the situation.
Swiss: he's being accused of having a guilty, and he says he knows X1 to be lying. This means that Swiss isn't a VT because he would have suggested possibility of being miller, and by extension he's not a miller. So, the situation falls on whether we believe X1 to be town or scum.
X1: calling a guilty on Swiss, claims even cop, and there's a contradiction between that and what he said about targetting someone toNight (N1) which he explains by saying he didn't want people to direct him.
A thought comes to mind: X1, you say that you didn't want people to direct you. But you had only claimed N0 cop; why would we have thought to direct you at all? People generally assume that N0 cop is a one-shot in my experience.
A bit repetitive of what's already been said, but also exactly what I expected you to say, that's good.What I think is we either need to lynch Swiss or X1 today otherwise every day were going to deal with the WHO IS SCUMMMMMMMMMM? out of the two of them for the rest of the game. Right now I'd rather go with X1 over swiss since I don't think x1 has addressed his claiming on who he was going to target even though he's an even seer.
I'll remind everyone that this really needs to be an X1/Swiss scenario. X1 is claiming cop with mod-confirmed sanity and a guilty on Swiss. One of the two needs to go, with the other going D2 if need be. Kuz shouldn't be a priority until D2/D3 when this situation has already resolved itself. I'm unsure about why the people voting Kuz are coming at this situation sideways when we have this duality situation going on.
Now, here's what we know about the situation.
Swiss: he's being accused of having a guilty, and he says he knows X1 to be lying. This means that Swiss isn't a VT because he would have suggested possibility of being miller, and by extension he's not a miller. So, the situation falls on whether we believe X1 to be town or scum.
X1: calling a guilty on Swiss, claims even cop, and there's a contradiction between that and what he said about targetting someone toNight (N1) which he explains by saying he didn't want people to direct him.
A thought comes to mind: X1, you say that you didn't want people to direct you. But you had only claimed N0 cop; why would we have thought to direct you at all? People generally assume that N0 cop is a one-shot in my experience.