#HBC | Dancer
The nicest of the damned.
ninja'd by Swiss post >.>
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
What is often done is claiming a N0 guilty and seeing how people react - it's a great way to get out of RVS (and look townie). My issue with X1 is that he has taken it beyond the point of information gathering, and is following a goal I can't seem to figure out.Anyone else find it funny how Swiss an x1 apparently planned this, yet only scum would try to cause this much confusion (give me a good reason why town would want to this.)
What claim? I've claimed nothing. X1 has claimed EVEN NIGHT cop and said he's investigating TONIGHT which is an ODD night.Swiss, X1 denies that it was faked. I'm not skimming, just your claim has been contested.
I suspected him before you even posted when Day 1 started.I say we lynch Swiss toDay, and if he flips scum then th3kuzinator goes next
you mean me as your other target, right?Good point.
Unvote Vote Kuz
Even though you're my other target. Self preservation much? ^^
his claim that you are guilty. you have a good point, he did slip on his even night investigations. which is why i switched my focus onto kuz.What claim? I've claimed nothing. X1 has claimed EVEN NIGHT cop and said he's investigating TONIGHT which is an ODD night.
Caps for emphasis.
not skimming anything in the thread. i just dont have much to say. im pointing out things that i find sketchy.Why are you reading Kuz' posts carefully, but skimming everything else?
Anyone can point out what they find scummy you know like this...his claim that you are guilty. you have a good point, he did slip on his even night investigations. which is why i switched my focus onto kuz.
i still dont think this was planned.
not skimming anything in the thread. i just dont have much to say. im pointing out things that i find sketchy.
kuz's sketchy meter is going up.
sketchy as in scummy.
Why do you care so much about being cleared? Do you think X1 is still town/cop after his slip and why? You were concerned with lynching X1 to see if he was telling the truth about being cop so why do you not want to still lynch Swiss who could potentially confirm X1?swiss, why does DH's unvote clear him?
and why does he get cleared for unvoting, but my unvote doesnt clear me?
i dont understand your point...Anyone can point out what they find scummy you know like this...
i dont. i just wanted swiss to elaborate on his reasoning for clearing DH. my question was more about DH than me.Why do you care so much about being cleared?
not really. i dont think he's scum, and i dont think he isnt cop. just that one slip takes him back a huge step. like on a scale of 1 to N0 cop, he is a lot closer to 1 than he used to be. but not all the way at 1, ya hear me?Do you think X1 is still town/cop after his slip and why? You were concerned with lynching X1 to see if he was telling the truth about being cop so why do you not want to still lynch Swiss who could potentially confirm X1?
I know. Thanks?@nabe
Strawmanning is when, instead of responding to a persons argument, you twist it.
Policy says that Swiss should go first with a claimed cop against him. But there's nothing stopping anyone from fakeclaiming N0 cop in a Day 1, and Swiss did catch him in a lie.Nabe, thoughts on Swiss and X1?
a yo mah nug swiss imma tell ya somethin' so u bettah listen up.
like i dun mind how ya defendin' urself an all but u gotta admit that it looks kinda weird when u say stuff liek "x1 admitted he was lying". i mean as far as i can c he never sed he was makin' things up? so y r u goin around claimin' he said dat? if u accuse him of lyin' [n u were pushin' fo' his lynch cuz of that earlier] then y do u make statements liek dat all of a sudden n xpect us 2 b ok with it? like u push x1 for lyin n now ur teh 1 lyin? sorry bro but i dun dig, u kno
I'll amend this to say "I believed the conversation between us was faked".Are you skimming?
The conversation between myself and X1 was faked, up until I gave my stances and X1 decided to try and lie to me.
With respect to the bolded. In my #198 I showed what he claimed was mechanically impossible, I took his then suddenly ignoring me and saying "why what?" as an admission. As 1) I know he's lying anyway and 2) I can read X1. I never said "x1 admitted he was lying" I said he pretty much admitted it which, to me, he did (if he was telling the truth, he could have easily shown why what he said WASN'T a lie - he seemed to be ripping into every other of my posts, why not this one? Because it is proof)I've already shown X1 was lying about his role. He pretty much admitted it in his recent posts.
OK. Why?Here's what I think, there is NO reason NOT to lynch Swiss in this game, he gives us the MOST information. However I feel there should be TONS of discussion before we take what is IMO the only lynch choice of D1.
If we do not lynch him today we risk missing out on information on a bunch of crucial D1 players.
-KevinM
I did, but why should I take your word as right, when you've been proven to be lying.gonna be honest DH, Did you not see my 232? WE DID NOT PLAN THIS
This is an interesting. I didn't even think of this before, but I can definitly see kuz as scum for this.BSL said:Kuz is scum. He knows Swiss is town. Or atleast not scum. What he sees is a perfect opportunity to seem town by claiming that Swiss looks like he is playing his typical townie play. This way, he can say "I told you so" when Swiss is lynched toDay (if that happens), and then push an X1 lynch tomorrow. Getting two townies. Then he can hold the fact that some of us voted for Swiss over our heads for the rest of the game.
4 posts up.@Nabe: I honestly don't remember anything of actual substance from you, besides from a bunch of fake activity. Please remind me where your head is at?
I was also about to say "p.s. that question is directed at everyone" but lol it's already labelled @Everyone. Instead, I'll say that if anyone at all could give any sort of answer, that would be helpful. Or even acknowledge that it's there? Cool.Policy says that Swiss should go first with a claimed cop against him. But there's nothing stopping anyone from fakeclaiming N0 cop in a Day 1, and Swiss did catch him in a lie.
@Everyone: Is there any history of Lynchers and Lynchees on this site? I'm a little concerned that a Swiss lynch might be the win condition of an indy X1, because I don't see the motive for scum!X1 to pull off this lie, and I don't see the motive for town!X1 to be lying at all, which he is to some extent regardless of what alignment he is.
KevinM what type of information should be acquired, your post remains quite bare. Bar optimism and heart it seems to be nothing but flair. Not to mention you using the account of another, has the mod required you to lose your role as a bro-other? Just curious about these two new developments, they are large considerations that defy expected elements.Here's what I think, there is NO reason NOT to lynch Swiss in this game, he gives us the MOST information. However I feel there should be TONS of discussion before we take what is IMO the only lynch choice of D1.
If we do not lynch him today we risk missing out on information on a bunch of crucial D1 players.
-KevinM
What I think is we either need to lynch Swiss or X1 today otherwise every day were going to deal with the WHO IS SCUMMMMMMMMMM? out of the two of them for the rest of the game. Right now I'd rather go with X1 over swiss since I don't think x1 has addressed his claiming on who he was going to target even though he's an even seer.Watson, what do you think of these current and startling events?
Why are you telling Kuz you think we should lynch him? Not only that, but do you think you're reasoning is enough for a lynch?[
Kuz, Swiss was mafia in BOTH oddworld and halo. When did you get to see his town play? Nowhere. Lies all up in this game.
Kuz, I suggest we lynch you instead of Swiss or X1.
What does that even mean?w.r.t.
u got it half-rite then.I have no idea what you meant then.
I thought you were saying you didn't understand why I wanted X1 lynched, and also said you thought it was bad I said X1 admitted he was lying.
What did you mean?
stop wat? idk wut ur talkin' about. im just doin' mah regular scumhuntin' stylezorz as always, mah doo. if dat's what u ask me 2 stop then imma go ahead and tell ya that i wont stop it. sorry broski.gheb, can you stop that?
u got it half-rite then.
wut imma try'na say is: x1 nevah said hes lyin' about his claim [if he did show me dem quotes] but u still say he did. dat's kinda hypocritical if ya ask meh cuz u were teh 1 who accused him of lyin' earlier. 'n now yer not only lyin' but u also keep on insistin' on yer stance even tho x1 claimed teh opposite.
I said he 'pretty much admitted it' - which to me, he did. I never said he actually admitted he was lying (though I know he is anyway). Slightly dodgy word territory, I could have been more clear. But like I said, to ME, he pretty much admitted it.With respect to the bolded. In my #198 I showed what he claimed was mechanically impossible, I took his then suddenly ignoring me and saying "why what?" as an admission. As 1) I know he's lying anyway and 2) I can read X1. I never said "x1 admitted he was lying" I said he pretty much admitted it which, to me, he did (if he was telling the truth, he could have easily shown why what he said WASN'T a lie - he seemed to be ripping into every other of my posts, why not this one? Because it is proof)