________
Edit : Some Prediction by Smashboards community (averages)
Steve 57% / Banjo & Kazooie 21%
Professor Layton 35% / Jibanyan 13% / Katrielle Layton 1.5%
Phoenix Wright 33% / Leon 29% / Jill 18% / Amaterasu 9%
Erdrick 29% / Sora 13% (These 2 reviews are from before the rumor about Erdrick.)
Crash 28%
Rayman 24% (evaluation already downgraded taking into account that Rayman exists in Spirit.)
Doomguy 12%
Ryu Hayabusa 10%
So, why ignore Professor Layton / Jibanyan so much?
Here is the problem with using these scores as a measure.
For reference, I run RTC. So I have experience in scores and predictions.
Averages ultimately boil down to a small sample of opinions. Perhaps one of the best examples of this would be Ridleys day in RTC, day 2. Many people rated him at below ten percent but outliers made him have a Chance score of around 18%.
Granted, this was way before any leaks, this was on March 10th. But the example still rings true of how this is a small sample.
Furthermore, using scores to justify likelyhood fails when you consider how volatile these scores are. Notice when in RTC there are correctionary rerates of characters. This is because peoples opinions change.
Scores also have a noticeable element of bias. Want scores help show this. For instance, Lip supporters on Lips days gave her extremely high scores on both. For the rules of RTC I could not discard them, but it did shift the perspective of scores a bit. People will be biased towards characters they want. I overrated Crash for base game for instance. I underrated Incineroar because I wanted Lycanroc instead.
Furthermore, since these sorts of scores are not gospel, people are free to have their own opinions. I for one see Layton as past his chance, and my score for him is lower.
Don’t use scores for your arguement.