• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Wobbling Compromise

Roneblaster

Smash Hero
Joined
Apr 16, 2009
Messages
6,041
Location
#MangoNation
im tired of hearing about wobbling and match-ups

theres ****ing 5 IC players worth mentioning and most of they are top level players anyway.

come talk to me in a year when theres a flood of IC players all who wobble and have no business being in a tournament bracket but make it anyway.

all the arguments are the same as when this thread started. i will once again take my leave from this thread as nothing good or new has been said.
 

TheZhuKeeper

Smash Champion
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
2,908
Location
Philadelphia, PA
I think someone said this before, but there's no reason to not ban blobbling / JC wobbling / w/e the **** you guys are naming these infinites LOL. Anything that basically keeps an opponent locked in a grab is essentially "wobbling", I don't see why you would ban one but not ban the other (or the other way around).

Honestly, I think I wouldn't mind if wobbling helped Wobbles (and Fly!!) advance farther in the bracket because him paired up with really good players will probably set up for some of the best matches we've ever seen, especially against those who actually know how to fight against ICs. I'll just have to hope they're not on my side if that ever happens >_>
 

adumbrodeus

Smash Legend
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Messages
11,321
Location
Tri-state area
im tired of hearing about wobbling and match-ups

theres ****ing 5 IC players worth mentioning and most of they are top level players anyway.

come talk to me in a year when theres a flood of IC players all who wobble and have no business being in a tournament bracket but make it anyway.

all the arguments are the same as when this thread started. i will once again take my leave from this thread as nothing good or new has been said.
I'd LOVE to see that.


Seriously, it's ****ing ICs, there's no way that they can compete with the likes of fox, falco, marth, puff, and Peach.


The top tier in melee is too strong, even marth has trouble getting grabs against fox and falco, why should ICs get that grab?
 

Ballistics

Smash Champion
Joined
Sep 14, 2006
Messages
2,266
Location
Tallahassee Florida State, what WHAT!
I think someone said this before, but there's no reason to not ban blobbling / JC wobbling / w/e the **** you guys are naming these infinites LOL. Anything that basically keeps an opponent locked in a grab is essentially "wobbling", I don't see why you would ban one but not ban the other (or the other way around).

Honestly, I think I wouldn't mind if wobbling helped Wobbles (and Fly!!) advance farther in the bracket because him paired up with really good players will probably set up for some of the best matches we've ever seen, especially against those who actually know how to fight against ICs. I'll just have to hope they're not on my side if that ever happens >_>
Eh, then they need to change the ban to a ban on all ice climber infinites, because wobbling is not BLIZZOBBLING.

And if they do that I think we would get mad.
 

TheZhuKeeper

Smash Champion
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
2,908
Location
Philadelphia, PA
Eh, then they need to change the ban to a ban on all ice climber infinites, because wobbling is not BLIZZOBBLING.

And if they do that I think we would get mad.
Realistically nothing is going to get banned and anyone that isn't Peach / Ganon / etc is just gonna pray they don't get an IC in bracket LOL.
 

Kyu Puff

Smash Champion
Joined
Feb 22, 2007
Messages
2,258
Location
Massachusetts
im tired of hearing about wobbling and match-ups

theres ****ing 5 IC players worth mentioning and most of they are top level players anyway.

come talk to me in a year when theres a flood of IC players all who wobble and have no business being in a tournament bracket but make it anyway.

all the arguments are the same as when this thread started. i will once again take my leave from this thread as nothing good or new has been said.
Good job refuting a single point... oh wait...

I'm tired of hearing stupid predictions not based in reality. Wobbling has been legal before (*gasp*) and what you're claiming never actually happened.
 

pockyD

Smash Legend
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Messages
11,926
Location
San Francisco, CA
who's to say they have no business being in the bracket? you couldn't beat a one-trick pony?

and also, it really can't happen like that since a flood of newb wobbling-only players would largely be forced to play each other and be unable to wobble
 

Pengie

Smash Lord
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
1,125
Location
Atlanta, GA
Apparently some people are blatantly unaware of how a metagame works. Sure at first there is a possibilty of tournaments being flooded by ICs (a very slim one mind you) but afterwards that flood would be followed by an influx if more Peaches since she already destroys ICs. This would then prompt a rise in the number of Marth/Fox players and so on.

Keep in mind that this is only possible if the worst case scenario of a flood ICs in tournaments happens, which as I already stated is highly unlikely.
 

BigD!!!

Smash Lord
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
1,833
peef, i said 6 or 7, and if you add in azn lep to your list (who is pretty good) thats 6

so you basically have 6 top level ice climber players out of (im gonna give a generous estimate here) 25ish total tournament going ice climber players

more than 20% of the people that play ice climbers in tournament are top level. thats the point i was trying to make. the possibility of the discovery of new strategies based on further usage of the character could lead to drastic improvements in the ice climber metagame, and their solidification as a top character.

for example, i think ice climber players in general under-utilize tech chasing. they say "wobbling only works if nana is right next to you and they are above 10%" but if you dthrow a fastfaller and actually actively tech chase them, nana should catch up to you by the second grab and that means that, not including any reaction based tech chasing which im sure is possible, you have a 1/4 chance of starting a wobble off of a grab even when nana isnt around. the only tech chasing ive ever seen ice climber players do, however, is guess something and charge dsmash.
 

adumbrodeus

Smash Legend
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Messages
11,321
Location
Tri-state area
idk about wc but tristate has that banned

and i like it that way

we all do
Obviously not everyone does, in fact it seems the majority of people who are concerned about the issue don't like it that way.

If you meant all of tri-state... I'm tri-state, counter-example ftw.
 

mastermoo420

Smash Ace
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
726
Thats only holding tristate back. The people who allow wobbling and blizzobbling will be training to never get grabbed.
This, in turn, will force all players to improve! Guys, unbanning any form of wobbling will better the melee community in the long run; do it.
 

P.C. Jona

Smash Master
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
3,175
who freaking cares

i cant believe you guys are still talking about this

its so stupid

no one is going to force it

or "opens someones eyes"

if a TO doesnt like it its banned

who gives a crap ughh
 

john!

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 19, 2006
Messages
8,063
Location
The Garden of Earthly Delights
^ that's why wobbling has been banned for so long, because of people like him who think "ic players are rare, nobody cares about them, let's just ban that nasty move of theirs even though they already suck, and forget about 'em".

i mean come on, ic's are top tier in brawl and their infinites are legal. and the odds of them becoming top tier in melee with wobbling are slim to none.
 

Pengie

Smash Lord
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
1,125
Location
Atlanta, GA
Well obviously ICs care, in addition to all of the people who get fed up with the scrubby mentality among smashers that amounts to "lulz ICs r ghey cuz I got grabed n dey kiled mi ther sooooooooo ghey". Not to mention that these are the same people who are very vocal and pressure TO's into banning something that even they agree isn't broken. The TOs then ban wobbling for fear of it hurting the tournaments attendance and the cycle continues. We need more TO's to just man the fuck up, make wobbling legal at their tournaments and let all of the scrubs either stay home and complain, or go to the tournament and cry when their carelessness gets them wobbled.

Or maybe instead of bitching and moaning they'd learn to avoid getting grabbed and the entire smash community benefits.
 

john!

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 19, 2006
Messages
8,063
Location
The Garden of Earthly Delights
Well judging by the recent trend of hating on Peef, TO's won't exactly be racing to allow wobbling at their tourneys. Keep in mind that the majority of smashers play top tier characters and, and the ones that hate wobbling do so for purely selfish reasons. Allowing wobbling would hurt these top tier characters, benefit IC's, and also indirectly benefit IC counters such as Peach and Ganon, leading to greater character balance. This is a case where democracy fails hard just because most people don't want more competition to get in the way of their top-tier gayness.
 
Joined
Oct 5, 2008
Messages
7,187
character balance
You know what low tier would probably benefit the most with wobbling legal? Zelda. She can play a pretty good game vs Ice Climbers. I'd say it's only like 60:40 in Ice Climbers' favor. If there's more Ice Climbers to get rid of the gayer characters like Sheik, Falcon, and Falco (all of which are ******** bullies to Zelda, like 80:20), Zelda could have a much easier time advancing to higher places. I'm shure this applies to a few other low tiers as well.
 

john!

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 19, 2006
Messages
8,063
Location
The Garden of Earthly Delights
I was honestly going to say Zelda but didn't want to get into a matchup discussion, because she's a very uncommon character. I play IC's vs. Zelda occasionally and it's not fun.

By the way, when I said "top tier characters", I just meant the top 5 (Fox, Falco, Sheik, Marth, Puff).
 
Joined
Oct 5, 2008
Messages
7,187
I was honestly going to say Zelda but didn't want to get into a matchup discussion, because she's a very uncommon character. I play IC's vs. Zelda occasionally and it's not fun.

By the way, when I said "top tier characters", I just meant the top 5 (Fox, Falco, Sheik, Marth, Puff).
I'm just talking atm because I'm bored.
 
Joined
Oct 5, 2008
Messages
7,187
The players in favor and against the ban are now 25 to 67

I really don't think this thread can contribute anymore to opinion, thanks to everyone that posted, I'm really excited magus found a new infinite.
Yeah, I really don't think anything will change or anything important will happen.

I'm really excited as well. Learning new stuff is always good.
 

KAOSTAR

the Ascended One
Joined
May 20, 2008
Messages
8,084
Location
The Wash: Lake City
I don't think reneblade is trying to troll tho.

even tho I disagree with his arguments he isn't nearly as abrasive or as much an ***.

mike says things to rub ppl the wrong way intentionally.(even tho RB made that thread about warbling calling me and nintendude out for heavily disagreeing with nonsensical arguments lol. I typically find roneblaster to be much more amicable.
 

adumbrodeus

Smash Legend
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Messages
11,321
Location
Tri-state area
Easily agreeable. What do you think of PC Jona?
I think they're scumbuddies, Jona seems to be trying to defend him while at the same time not referencing him as a distancing tactic.


Out of the two, Rene seems the most scummy, so him first, if he flips scum we should probably lynch Jona.


Vote: Rene





Seriously though, tbh there are a lot of strong feelings on this issue and I think a lot of people are just arguing from feelings, much more then they normally would at least. I can't hold anyone's disagreement with me on this issue too much against them imo.
 
Top Bottom