So then ****ing respond to my post instead of DISMISSING it like you claim I'm doing.
No you ****ing don't that is an abject lie as you continue to demonstrate again and again. Politicians have nothing on you.
Sorry, I think I posted a response intended for another thread to yours. I will review and respond accordingly.
However, whether this is true or not you have reduced your argument to ad hominems and seem to have let emotion overcome the conversation instead of staying respectful.
I'll edit this post with an update on the response, until then please do not reduce the conversation to playground name-calling less a mod comes this way and reminds you in their usual manner.
Edit: After reviewing the responses it has been determined that it was indeed you who not only dragged the argument down with a nitpicking of formatting, but was also responsible for pretending I said "no u" as an argument and never evidenced the supposed "invalid reasoning" you accused me of - When asked to show how the reasoning could possibly be invalid you give me this monster of an ad hominem fallacy as a response (contained in the quote tag above).
One last chance to redeem your argument:
First point was a question for clarification because the quoted statement seems to be false, second one I don't understand how it's relevant at all (so I guess also a question for clarification sorta), third I point out how that statement is false, and fourth I point out how that is false again.
I asked for a
demonstration of what you claimed was "invalid reasoning", not a rephrasing/summary of what you recall was said. A demonstration, please, if you know much of what validity means logically it should be simple to demonstrate and then my argument should be defeated and we can move on with the discussion to something better than invalid reasoning.
The quotes are literally exact quotes from your post (the larger excerpt being at the top of the post in the quote box) so once again YOU are the one being dishonest and/or absolutely incapable of reading.
I'm sorry, but I don't believe you'll find "no u" anywhere in my argument. If you believe otherwise please cite your source. If you believe I am being dishonest (in contrast to simply mistaken about what you are talking about) I am sure you will be able to prove this by simply using the quote tags which will link me to the response I posted (should be part of your logical demonstration of validity - see above).
(And just a reminder, your first response should be corrected in that I was referring to the differences between DLC and the Custom Fighter button. It was not an argument against using customs in a tournaments setting).