I hate when people use bizarre (if creative) logic to "confirm" things, even if they have no factual basis to their claim.
(there's only 1 free Newcomer slot left on the character page anyway.)
...Like that. What, adding another row to that list would be completely impossible? It's not a "slot" to be "filled," it's just a quirk in the Brawl website's layout. It confirms nothing. Or do you not remember when there was only
one row of characters under the "Newcomers" heading, and then two, and then three...It's not like there have always been four rows just waiting to be filled.
I also don't like when people act like Lucas' very existance proves that Ness can't
possibly be in Brawl. Who says Ness couldn't have a completely new moveset? As Sakurai himself said when he revealed Bowser, "If you think they’re all going to be the same as they have been, it’ll be rough for you."
And speaking of movesets, that reminds me of
another thing that irritates me, more than anything else. Who was the person who first had the bright idea to start using fabricated "movesets" as a way of "proving" that some character or another is definitely/couldn't possibly be in Brawl?
Did Mr. Game & Watch have an RPG-esque list of attacks in the games he originally appeared in? Did the Ice Climbers? Did Fox ever use his Fox Illusion attack in any of the Starfox games? Did Captain Falcon's role in the F-Zero games ever involve throwing flaming-fisted punches, or
anything besides
driving a car? Look at Pit, even! He never had
swords in the Kid Icarus games! None of those character's movesets were drawn frame-for-frame from the games in which they originated.
Yet people still seem to love saying "so-and-so
can't be in Brawl, because there's no way they could have a moveset." Just 'cause you can't come up with one doesn't mean the Brawl developers can't. Trying to prove that a character can't be in Brawl because you can't think of a full moveset for them is like trying to prove something about a series' storyline by using fanfiction as "evidence." The irritation factor of this particular type of argument is bolstered by the arrogance and condecension it is typically coupled with.