Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Gietz is bad now, you can play him =)thinking about coming to this, but i dont really play melee. is there anyone else like this? will i just get fully owned?
That's really silly tbh. You're just giving the second person a better chance of winning. Big deal, leave that to low tier tourneys kthnx. You may as well ban all the top/high tier characters all together. If the better player wins, he/she has worked for it. End of story.-A system which denies the previous tournaments winner a character from the previously used tier bracket and above.
Have them drop from Fox Falco Sheik etc. to using someone like Samus....still win and drop to something lower like Doc etc. until they either lose or win as mewtwo lol.
Heres an idea...lets do round robin and put the top 5 players in the one pool while having the second and third pools with the lesser ranked players. I think it'd be a bit discouraging to the lesser rank people thinking "oh yeah I've made it this far!" only to crush them in the quarter/semi's [LOL I went there]. Melee gets exciting to watch when there is a Person A vs Person B and you know that they're good or a grudge matches. Man...finals are exciting when you watch the top players play it out. Isnt that also one of the reasons we prefer Melee over Brawl? In no way am I implying that Brawl sucks, but it just comes down to preferences. I enjoy Brawl, but not at a competitive level.-Seed differently
Highest rated players all square off early and give lower players some breathing space and a better chance to accrue some points at least.
Your concern here is valid, but fear not my thinking is top tier. Your point of view is looking at the finals situation alone, in which case yes the runner up would likely have a bump in chance to win. The idea of this however is that the person who previously won with the better character must first win their way up to the finals before that situation would occur. In the preceding matches the change of circumstance could very well change the outcome of the brackets altogether, giving someone who previously got wiped by the previous winners top tier in a close match the chance to overcome their lesser character totally changing the end-game.That's really silly tbh. You're just giving the second person a better chance of winning. Big deal, leave that to low tier tourneys kthnx. You may as well ban all the top/high tier characters all together. If the better player wins, he/she has worked for it. End of story.
No-one with half a brain comes to these things expecting top place on their first try anyhow. Just as no-one new to swimming can be expected to swim the english channel on their first try. It's better to give them some experience however, and let everyone get a good few matches in so to learn against someone closer to their level and get their time and moneys worth of fun and exp. . Why pay a fee for pot when you get two boring games that're over in a moment then head home? No incentive = lesser new blood = lower pot = lesser old blood and game growth.I think it'd be a bit discouraging to the lesser rank people thinking "oh yeah I've made it this far!" only to crush them in the quarter/semi's [LOL I went there]. Melee gets exciting to watch when there is a Person A vs Person B and you know that they're good or a grudge matches. Man...finals are exciting when you watch the top players play it out.
Fixed - cheeky Colbet!I voted "Yes" with hopes of seeing a positive change in the Melbourne Melee scene. The monthly winnings I had in March didn't seem different compared to the monthlies back in '07. I need your change!
Late happy b'day Tak!
Loki said:Hi guys,
We'll be holding a meeting this coming Saturday the 14th of March to open discussion and start planning on the first big annual tournament we're planning for later this year.
Details: 4pm, Saturday the 14th of March
John Curtin Hotel (downstairs of the Ranbat venue)
As I said, I just want to open discussions about this event, and getting everyone who's interested together, talking, and agreeing is the first step.
The current agenda is as follows: (please suggest topics to be included)
What different players (diff.games/local/interstate) want
Venue (current findings, convent suitability)
Time Frame (running time and date)
Tournaments (and format)
Other Events (running during the weekend)
Prizes and sponsorship opportunities
Name suggestions/discussion (I'm sick of referring to it as "the annual")
Please let me know if you can make it, I will reschedule it the key players and/or a large amount of eager parties are unable to make it.
Hope to see you all there so we can get the ball rolling ASAP.