And I think you're right and I think we need to do better.
We're all volunteers without, like, corporate job training. Consistency just comes through practice and reading other reports you weren't a part of. But then because mods are somewhat compartmentalized by which part of the site they're in charge of, there can be variances in how they handle particular situations or how strict they are from forum to forum.
I know that I'm probably on the "too lax" side in comparison to the average, so I'm working on that.
Yeah. I have some perspective on the issue due to my past experience in admin positions, which is why I’m speaking out about it. I agree with you.
Also about the too lax thing, I kinda feel like that’s a good way to go mostly. Consistency doesn’t have to be “all eyes on the boards and infract every rule breaker”- that’s impractical. However I think the prioritization should be adjusted as well as communicated properly so that everyone is able to actually know what to expect instead of people being blindsided randomly by an infraction they got for a post they made like 5 hours ago that they thought was fine.
Like for instance, some of the more minor things, I feel like most of the infractions for those are hard to substantially justify. In which case, I would understand infractions those if they actually cause problems but because the current method is preemptive, then that leaves a whole lot of (and too much) wiggle room for individual discretion and punishment for something that probably wouldn’t have happened otherwise. Whereas if it’s a thing that has been reported to have caused a problem either through the report form or as a complaint in the thread, I get handing out an infraction for it.
I think one of the cores of the issue is also the “family-friendly” image that is being advertised in the terms for participating in SWF. I’m sure literally everyone here knows that especially in threads like this that that isn’t the case, so it almost feels like infractions for very minor offenses in the name of preemptive appropriateness is disingenuous.
I have a lot to say on the topic but I’ve talked too long already lol