• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Social Ultimate Social Thread: Under Construction. Be Back Soon!

What are you most excited about for E3?


  • Total voters
    107
Status
Not open for further replies.

SneakyLink

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jul 14, 2014
Messages
12,032
Location
The Land of Oz
NNID
bne9635
Switch FC
SW-6259-3694-6593
The cycle continues....

Back to (trying to make) Cyberchase gifs. Got at least one more planned today.
 

Swamp Sensei

Today is always the most enjoyable day!
BRoomer
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
39,243
Location
Um....Lost?
NNID
Swampasaur
3DS FC
4141-2776-0914
Switch FC
SW-6476-1588-8392
All this talk about content creators giving me flashbacks about what happened to Channel Awesome



What an absolute cluster****
What happened to Channel Awesome
 

Idon

Smash Legend
Joined
May 24, 2018
Messages
17,796
Location
Chaos Shrine
NNID
Jack Garland
Switch FC
SW-4826-9581-3305
Not sure if this was already mentioned (just getting back from work and what not) but best buy removed the render and the smash section. however, if you click on the url for the image it still shows up.

Weird, it didn’t seem like nintendo or best buy were in a rush to remove it this morning, but now it’s gone


I don't think we need anymore evidence it's real. It's pre-release Ken levels of not-fake.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
Not sure if this was already mentioned (just getting back from work and what not) but best buy removed the render and the smash section from the way it was advertised. however, if you click on the url for the image it still shows up.

Weird, it didn’t seem like nintendo or best buy were in a rush to remove it this morning, but now it’s gone. Wonder if it’s really something they weren’t supposed to show, or...the most elaborate april fools joke ever (probs not lol)


I mean Nintendo spilled the beans, it is too late.
Joker render looks really cool by the way.
 

Dr. James Rustles

Daxinator
Joined
Mar 24, 2008
Messages
4,019
hey guys, it's reggie here. are you ready to oppress appreciation for the human body by telling people it objectifies women
 

TriStarGamer

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Messages
149
Location
LUIGI LOOK
3DS FC
0774-4620-2306
Switch FC
5415-2743-8314
I don't think we need anymore evidence it's real. It's pre-release Ken levels of not-fake.
Oh yeah i agree with you on that. The quality of that render alone makes it believable from what we’ve seen for smash renders, just funny how it’s just back and forth with joker (has he been playing us all for fools this whole time?) lol
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
I wish I had Joker or Shulk's body, I am not going to lie.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Guh-Huzzah!

Totally humorous voice over and YouTube guy.
Joined
Jun 9, 2018
Messages
19,309
Location
A van down by the river
Switch FC
SW-2454-8991-5893
If you're surprised at Christian's using innuendo, then you dont know Christians. Lol

Bible is raunchy too.

The Bible had poems about all the body parts a husband and wife love about each other for crying out loud.
You know I was joking, right? It's not like Christians are legally obliged to not make innuendos. I was just jesting.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
Y'know, I know this is April Fools, but I think we got the Certified Seal of Spawn's Approval. If anything, for the first time ever, actually giving out a taste of insider knowledge of how he knows stuff before most people. Me likey.

Also he taking shots at Gaming Intel. Me also likey.

 

Just a penguin

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 19, 2018
Messages
3,621
Location
Noipoi's Fan Club- Antarctica
I have a question: which of these drawings are better?

View attachment 203704
or
View attachment 203705

the above was made 4 years ago on a 3DS, the below was made in MS Paint.
That's a tough one. The first one perfectly describes the post-modernist sensibilities of monochromatic compositions and subverting the expectation of the viewer, while the second one fits more in line with the neoclassicism period, emphasizing the character and emotion shown over the overall meaning of the piece.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom