FoosJr
Smash Ace
you're on and after that i challenge you to a foosball MMI challenge all Oregon folk to a stepmania MM and a DDR MM
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
you're on and after that i challenge you to a foosball MMI challenge all Oregon folk to a stepmania MM and a DDR MM
Ok, there had best be stepmania and DDR at TANG on the 24thyou're on and after that i challenge you to a foosball MM
Well, if that wasn't the saddest attempt to sound intelligent I've ever read. Even the mechanics in that sentence need some help. Using larger words doesn't make you sound intelligent, being straightforward does.Well, if that wasn't the most ironically depressing response to an accusation of having poor grammar I've ever read..
I hope you meant to contradict yourself in saying that he gets his point across effectively. That'd be good humor. I should hope you meant for it to happen that way, as that would have been my goal, but I am slightly disinclined to believe it. The veil the internet casts over the intent of words is a thick one, and I have not seen proof of your capacity to make use of that technique."Objective consideration of contemporary phenomena compels the conclusion that success or failure in competitive activities exhibits no tendency to be commensurate with innate capacity, but that a considerable element of the unpredictable must invariably be taken into account."
George gets the point across rather well.
I was hoping you wouldn't get the reference, claiming I contradict myself.Here is a well-known verse from Ecclesiastes:
I returned and saw under the sun, that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time and chance happeneth to them all.
Here it is in modern English:
Objective considerations of contemporary phenomena compel the conclusion that success or failure in competitive activities exhibits no tendency to be commensurate with innate capacity, but that a considerable element of the unpredictable must invariably be taken into account.
What seems like the right thing doesn't necessarily always fit the bill. A semicolon is used between closely related independent clauses not joined with a coordinating conjunction. That is what that sentencence consisted of.That comma was not misused. If you're suggesting a semi-colon belongs there, you'd be mistaken. A period would not be used, since they are dependent clauses. A comma seems like a perfect fit in that case.
I already knew what you got it from. It was easy enough to copy and paste that into google and get a wikipedia result. The contradiction exists in the fact that he doesn't get the point across well because he goes against what he himself is saying in using an unnecessary amount of words. It's a sort of ironic humor in order to stress a point. Dig?When I quoted George Orwell, I was referencing an essay he wrote decades ago called, "Politics and the English Language." In the essay, he says that pseudo-intellectual modern English is crap. He takes a quote from the bible and then rephrases it in "modern English."
I was hoping you wouldn't get the reference, claiming I contradict myself.
Impressive? No.
Yeah, because I said that's why he's a douchebag and all.I thought Kyle was opinionated, but not douchey. I met him and actually got to know him through NCT2, and thought he was pretty cool. I can respect someone who isn't afraid to state their opinion. Know what I mean? I think it's pretty unfair to call someone a douchbag because of that. It's not like he spits in people's hair, or closes doors before someone can walk through.