And Rockin? both have sort of shut up since Matunas called me out ![Frown :( :(]()
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It's difficult to really be active cause we still don't have much of a strong motive. But I'll do my best to be active(My name is Matunas) Please don’t back off of anything. That promotes inactivity. Come on guys we were kicking *** on activity on Day one, where’s the love today?
And Tom – Can we get some kind of word as to Eor’s replacement?
Okay, so far, we've lynched of Stratford, who happened to be a Mafia. Right now, we're trying to see who to lynch off next. I reccommand to look back from start to finish as to what's been contributed and that you may have a good idea on what to say.So can someone help me catch up with what has been going on?
Let's keep in mind something. We don't need a leader. Them being a leader gives them a immunity. As a group, we need to work together and agree on something. Try to keep that in mind.How is that susposed to be a bad thing. Indirectly because of me, the town was in a state of choas and stupid things were being said. Being the leader that I am, I decided it was my duty to get the town back in respectable condition and get everyone to see Stratford for the scum that he is. At that point a majority of the players started to see me as a good leader and I felt it would be of poor character of me to step down. The town needs a strong leader and I believe Matunas and I can fill that quota.
I have to respectfully disagree here. Each person operating on their own can make some very odd results. Having a leader figure can keep us on the right track pretty well. Also regarding immunity, that is why I listed two leaders. With that you will see both ends of the spectrum and no one gets immuntity. Also even if we had a strong central figure they would still not recieve immunity. Because of the nature of the game, no one is cleared from suspicion. Even if they are cop checked, they could still be a godfather. I do see where you are coming from though.Let's keep in mind something. We don't need a leader. Them being a leader gives them a immunity. As a group, we need to work together and agree on something. Try to keep that in mind.
Its called lead up to finals. And it blows. I seriously did HW for 16 hours this weekend, and didn't even get it all done. So now I'm dealing with the overflow from the weekend, and trying to relax somewhat. I did mention this at the start of the weekend. Regardless, my life will still be dominated by school for another week and a half prolly, as I have to memorize a speech (in japanese mind you), make an entire computer program, create a play program for one of the first Novels (Tale of Genji) while making it argue something about the tale, and finish off a comic of said Tale. Needless to say, this is going to take a while and I need the time to work on it. However, when I am taking my sanity breaks, I have been checking the game to the best of my weakened state. I will continue doing this, but I doubt I will be able to contribute all that much. Regardless, Ill try to contribute something once a day, deal?Also where has Ronike been?
1. when did i ever, in the slightest sense, hint at the fact that i wanted to lynch an inexperienced player. if anything, throughout day 1, i maintained my position that lynching an experienced player would be in everyone's best interest (get your facts straight)Relating to my vote for MexicanBj, I just dont really like his thought process. At first he said that we should we should vote for the inexpierenced player. After that he said that he has expierence with mafia just not online. By saying that he tried to elimanate himself from the inexpirenced catogory so he would not be under the suspicion for the category I just listed. Later on he voted for Marshy because of inactivity. Before and after he posted alot which would remove him from the inactivity clause. So far, IMO, his strategy is to bring up a category for suspicion than immeadeately try to remove himself from that category. To me that seems pretty suspicious.
Also where has Ronike been?
The thing is, we're not operating on our own. We're doing this in a team effort. A leader is usually good to have. In these type of games though, that's a bad thing. We shouldn't try to look at one another as a leader. Instead, we should see each other as the Jury, or the Supream Court. We throw out opinons to one another and come to a unanimous agreement. Sometimes, having a leader, or a judge, could lead to one's death. There has been many times in movies where the leader leads to others in victory...there has been possibly the same amount of times where the 'leader' leads them to their death/demis and the hero/heroine comes and defeats/kills the leader, which showed they was the bad guy.I have to respectfully disagree here. Each person operating on their own can make some very odd results. Having a leader figure can keep us on the right track pretty well. Also regarding immunity, that is why I listed two leaders. With that you will see both ends of the spectrum and no one gets immuntity. Also even if we had a strong central figure they would still not recieve immunity. Because of the nature of the game, no one is cleared from suspicion. Even if they are cop checked, they could still be a godfather. I do see where you are coming from though.
Yes you was.I not trying to put myself in as a leader. I am, however, trying to put someone in as leader. I just tend to feel better when there is a defined leader.
See? You and Matunas wanted to be leader (well...you do, but just want to put Matunas cause he may have a leader quality in him.How is that susposed to be a bad thing. Indirectly because of me, the town was in a state of choas and stupid things were being said. Being the leader that I am, I decided it was my duty to get the town back in respectable condition and get everyone to see Stratford for the scum that he is. At that point a majority of the players started to see me as a good leader and I felt it would be of poor character of me to step down. The town needs a strong leader and I believe Matunas and I can fill that quota.
So here's my contribution for the day:
I find Eor's request for replacement to be quite... interesting to say the least... For someone who had the patience, and will to exert the kind of effort to manage a game of such epic proportions as The Thing not to mention one of the most active Decisive Gamer, to quit out of such a small, low maintenance game such as this is rather strange. I think it is entirely possible that he wanted to stay behind the scenes for as long as he could, but then he got called on it. Seeing no incredibly easy way out of it, I wouldn't be surprised if he did this to clear his name. Not entirely likely, but also not out of possibility.
That was exactly the same thing I was thinking when I saw that Eor needed a replacement. Since one mafia was killed, and the general thoughy was that there are 2 mafia. I predicted that he may have felt like he needed a drastic plan in order to make the mafia win.I find Eor's request for replacement to be quite... interesting to say the least... For someone who had the patience, and will to exert the kind of effort to manage a game of such epic proportions as The Thing not to mention one of the most active Decisive Gamer, to quit out of such a small, low maintenance game such as this is rather strange. I think it is entirely possible that he wanted to stay behind the scenes for as long as he could, but then he got called on it. Seeing no incredibly easy way out of it, I wouldn't be surprised if he did this to clear his name. Not entirely likely, but also not out of possibility.
So I propose that you do not lynch me today or tomorrow, and see if can catch the mafia.
Your confidence in you being Town is high. Possibly high enough to be considered 'reverse psychology,' meaning you do things opposite of what you're suppose to do. Like looking inside a Diary when you're not suppose to. Like making a person go first though a roach infested hallways instead of you going. Basically bending ways to make it go your way.However if we do get down to final 3, you guys should lynch me just to make sure. (Even though that will cost us the game)
You pretty much convinced me. Also I meant experienced, but alas editing is not allowed.1. when did i ever, in the slightest sense, hint at the fact that i wanted to lynch an inexperienced player. if anything, throughout day 1, i maintained my position that lynching an experienced player would be in everyone's best interest (get your facts straight)
2. because of my first point, my statement that "i'm experienced, just not online" does not have the intention you describe at all. it's simply the truth (junglefever can attest to this. nobody's trying to get out a category)
3. and um, voting for someone due to inactivity in the situation of day 1 is as good of a reason as any. you're accusation of me posting a lot during my vote of marshy makes no sense. you tell me. how else am i supposed to vote for someone without being "active." your argument therefore applies to anyone who ever votes for anyone because of inactivity
4. i have proven both your "categories" that you say i just bring up and remove myself from. any more?
thanks.
also, i find it a bit suspicious that you decided to randomly vote for me without ANY explanation (initially) and also while debating a COMPLETELY different issue
Basically what I'm trying to do here, because I know I am not the mafia, is to heighten our chances of catching mafia within the next two days, but also relieve your suspicions that if I'm mafia, I will be caught, by saying you can lynch me when we get down to final 3.However this was not the case. And I don't see how I would be able to convince you that I am not mafia. I'm kind of in a tough spot because if you do not lynch me today, you will always have the thought in your head, "what if?" and there will always be suspicion on me. So I propose that you do not lynch me today or tomorrow, and see if can catch the mafia. Because I feel that if I'm off the list of people to lynch than you will have better chances to ccatch whoever is mafia. However if we do get down to final 3, you guys should lynch me just to make sure. (Even though that will cost us the game)
Instead of saying how good you plan is, show us how good it is? What are the details?Well I don't know how else to approach this because noone can trust anyone. I'm trying to reassure you guys that if you follow my plan, and I am mafia that I will be caught and if I am not mafia we have more a chance of catching mafia. I have faith in the town that we will pick the mafia before it is down to final 3, especially if we follow my plan because our chances become greater. It would (1/6) and (1/4) instead of (1/7) and (1/5).
Could you re-word the bolded part? I did not get it.Daily Contribution: I gots nothing. Sorry guys, I just dont have anything new to say. Though I do want to clarify to Macman and others that I do not believe that that is a strong possibility, just a minor possiblity that prevents us from eliminating macman from the list of suspects. That being said, I believe you can retract your proposal of lynch immunity, thank you very much.
This is very true, I guess I felt as though I was on the chopping block and I didn't want the town to waste a vote on me. I retract my plan then.um...macman i think i understand your argument, but the problem is......literally everyone can say the same thing for themselves
everyone who is town knows themselves that they are town and could thus, propose your "strategy"
thus i dont think it's a viable option at this point.
Resposting this so no one misses it.I guess I should post this now to get it out of the way.
I will not be here thursday,friday, and most likely saturday.
I was just about suggest this.Due to exams and lotso people being absent, I propose that we put this game on hold for a week. That way, those of us that are gone, don't miss much, and don't feel pressured to come on and quick skim through and post a hastly thought out response. If nobody likes that idea, ok, but if we do, great.
I have no exam, so I will be bored and the only one active in this. =/I agree with holding off a bit as well.
Unvote: junglefever6478
Although my last exam is tomorrow, so I would have been good after that.![]()