greenblob
Smash Lord
Falcon, too slow? Surely you jest.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
This is the most ******** statement I've heard in the past month. My brain couldn't even process the first sentence.yoshi is the best when/if played perfectly
however realistically, pika, kirby and falcon own top tier...the rest is up to you to decided. but without a doubt, pika, kirby and falcon on top. no questions asked
This is the most ******** statement I've heard in the past month. My brain couldn't even process the first sentence.
1. Any character should win if played "perfect"ly
2. Imagine a "perfect" yoshi vs a "perfect" fox. /headasplode
Neither would ever hit each other.
I hope the migraine you just gave me was intentional. If not, plz proof-read your posts. Better yet, think before you type.
Yeah I think your just focusing on his up tilt and uair's =\Yoshi can't combo floaties.
ness is *easier* to use than yoshiSee this is what I don't get. Ness is top tier because he can be INSANE if played to the max. But the same with yoshi and he's bottom tier? The tier list is all screwed up >_>
Easier to use cheap wise. Throw throw throw SPIKE! But that shouldn't make him top tier =\ness is *easier* to use than yoshi
Exactly what I'm trying to get through some people's heads =_=ness shouldn't be top tier I've already said it but no one ever changes it Fox is far superior to him.
Don't tell me to shut up you big meanySHUT UP Ness owns just not online.
Falcon and kirby's is also broken.Ness just has that stupid ada that is like a super spike.
What I mean by broken is...The spikes that come out so fast like falcon, ness and kirby weren't supposed to be spikes. Thats why spikes in melee do a little charge kind of thing.Falcon's spike is not broken.
Maybe the people I play with just don't abuse it. /shrug
Yea falcon's is somewhat more difficult to pull off but even if kirby misses he can just fly to safety. Its garbage.
Falcon and kirby's is also broken.
Most definately not, she has terrible combo abilityMy samus is mid tier.... Keyboard ftw
Your yoshi is disgustingly low.Alright, here's my opinion:
Top:
Kirby
Pikachu
High:
Fox
Falcon
Ness
Mid:
Mario
Jigglypuff
Low:
DK
Luigi
Link
Bottom:
Yoshi
Samus
Yep, he's the only character with a debatable position. Where would you put him ?Your yoshi is disgustingly low.
regardless, he can't be top tier kuz he runs too slowly and his recovery is easily edge-guard-able
Easier to use cheap wise. Throw throw throw SPIKE! But that shouldn't make him top tier =\
First, forgive me if this has already been addressed -- I've read many of but NOT all of the 48 pages on this thread.
People have been saying a lot that "skill > tier" and "just because one player's link can beat another player's pikachu it doesn't mean pikachu isn't still a higher tier" etc.
My question then: what exactly does the tier ranking mean, if anything?
Does the list mean "this is how good the characters are for people who aren't very good at the game"? We've clearly established that it DOESN'T mean "this is how good the characters are for people who have mastered the game." People who have mastered the game (Isai) seem to really like beating people with Link and Donkey Kong.
Does the list mean "this is how easy the characters are to learn"?
"This is a ranking of character statistics that don't determine match outcome"?
Tell me, how exactly does one define the tier system.
exactly equal skillIf two players of exactly equal skill were to go against each other, the one who has a higher tiered character would win the match.