I'm not really unhappy, but there is a motif in my family about me being a person that is impossible to reason with, and because that concept irks me because it aims for what I associate with myself very passionately, and the methodology in which these accusations come to me puts me at near disbelief.
It's just, when I get into a topic with someone, and we make statements, and then we explain those statements, somewhere along the line these days, my father, and just tonight two times in a row, my brother, they stop and make it personal and shift attention away from the topic and say that I have no intention of being reasoned with. They always do this when I question something they state. It never fails. And when I do that enough, they reach the "Holder Point", and they interpret it as, "Ohhhh Holder, you see this is why I can't talk with you, you are being so unreasonable, what with you always asking for reasons for things!" The first time my father did this, earlier in that same discussion, he implied that the topic didn't need to be understood. I feel like that whole discussion was our biases doing an interpretive dance together.
Tonight my brother and me went to go see Iron Man 3 (was pretty good by the way), and before it went on we started talking about something that involved my brother, at one point, leaving the topic and claiming that our father was right about me. I was fortunate enough to shut him up with some logic, though I feel like it ended because I referenced what father did in the discussion, and the note he ended it on was that he agreed father does that sometimes, as if it was his bias now appeased. Then, after the movie, I talk about an aspect of the movie which I found rather random, and off we go talking about it, and he artificially constructs a point to rationalize his original view opposing me. I questioned it, and he grew very upset and referenced our father yet again.
I mean, damn... It's not a big deal, but that is so unfair and I would never try to do that to them. Anyways, boring rant over. Moral of the story is that some people have a "Holder Point" where, after so many times, they erroneously get annoyed with getting asked for reasons to support their bias and they become convinced that the inquirer is in fact merely guarding their own bias by never being satisfied with any opposing answer, rather than believing that their reasons aren't actually being founded anywhere at all.