• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

The Titanic?

Status
Not open for further replies.

flaco

The Terminator
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
3,105
Location
Springfield Mass
Did the titanic really sick cuz of the ice berg?I found out in the internet it was the soviets that shot it down
why did they do these? is still a mystery to me I don't believe it was and iceberg remember titanic was made of pure steel and with 16 watertight compartments...

So you will be the judge like I said is pure steel...

discuss

I feel so sad all those people die :confused:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saalGKY7ifU
update

here is the proof

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=af07
 

flaco

The Terminator
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
3,105
Location
Springfield Mass
The USSR was made in 1922 and ended 1991
The Russian Revolution started at 1917.

The Titanic sunk in 1912.
It was sunk by an iceburg.
k well like I said pure steel so how could a iceberg sink pure steel with 16 watertight compartments?
 

POKE40

Smash Lord
Joined
Aug 27, 2008
Messages
1,083
Location
♥ My post count is my age. Deal with it.
k well like I said pure steel so how could a iceberg sink pure steel with 16 watertight compartments?
The Ship's plates of that day wasn't suitable for low temperatures.
The frigid temperatures made the plates brittle.

I hate using wiki. but here it is:

Construction and metallurgy

Originally, historians thought the iceberg had cut a gash into Titanic's hull. Since the part of the ship that the iceberg damaged is now buried, scientists used sonar to examine the area and discovered the iceberg had caused the hull to buckle, allowing water to enter Titanic between her steel plates.
A detailed analysis of small pieces of the steel plating from the Titanic's wreck hull found that it was of a metallurgy that loses its elasticity and becomes brittle in cold or icy water, leaving it vulnerable to dent-induced ruptures. The pieces of steel were found to have very high content of phosphorus and sulphur (4× and 2× respectively, compared with modern steel), with manganese-sulphur ratio of 6.8:1 (compared with over 200:1 ratio for modern steels). High content of phosphorus initiates fractures, sulphur forms grains of iron sulphide that facilitate propagation of cracks, and lack of manganese makes the steel less ductile. The recovered samples were found to be undergoing ductile-brittle transition in temperatures of 90 °F (32 °C) for longitudinal samples and 133 °F (56 °C) for transversal samples, compared with transition temperature of −17 °F (−27 °C) common for modern steels: modern steel would only become so brittle in between −76 °F and −94 °F (−60 °C and −70 °C). The Titanic's steel, although "probably the best plain carbon ship plate available at the time", was thus unsuitable for use at low temperatures.[81] The anisotropy was probably caused by hot rolling influencing the orientation of the sulphide stringer inclusions. The steel was probably produced in the acid-lined, open-hearth furnaces in Glasgow, which would explain the high content of phosphorus and sulphur, even for the time.[81][82]
Another factor was the rivets holding the hull together, which were much more fragile than once thought.[82][83] From 48 rivets recovered from the hull of the Titanic, scientists found many to be riddled with high concentrations of slag. A glassy residue of smelting, slag can make rivets brittle and prone to fracture. Records from the archive of the builder show that the ship's builder ordered No. 3 iron bar, known as "best"—not No. 4, known as "best-best", for its rivets, although shipbuilders at that time typically used No. 4 iron for rivets. The company also had shortages of skilled riveters, particularly important for hand riveting, which took great skill: the iron had to be heated to a precise colour and shaped by the right combination of hammer blows. The company used steel rivets, which were stronger and could be installed by machine, on the central hull, where stresses were expected to be greatest, using iron rivets for the stern and bow.[82] Rivets of "best best" iron had a tensile strength approximately 80% of that of steel, "best" iron some 73%.[84] Despite this, the most extensive and finally fatal damage Titanic sustained at boiler rooms No. 5 and 6 was done in an area where steel rivets were used.
Wikipedia junk

The reason why so many people died:
-insufficent lifeboats

Some third-class people didn't even know where the lifeboats were. :(
 

Lythium

underachiever
BRoomer
Joined
Mar 6, 2009
Messages
17,012
Location
Halifax, Nova Scotia
In Soviet Russia, Titanic sinks you.

No, but really. There's tons of evidence to document it. The Titanic was sunk by an iceberg. End of story. Cool story, though. :)
 

DtJ Jungle

Check out my character in #GranblueFantasy
BRoomer
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Messages
24,020
Location
Grancypher
This has go to be one of the biggest lol's at a conspiracy ive had in a long long time.


Show me proof that smoeone other than yourself thinks this.
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2009
Messages
8,100
Location
Baklavaaaaa
So many dead = Bad quality lifeboats/insignificant amount of lifeboats, ocean at hypothermic temperatures.

Sunk = Iceberg, the wreckage of it proves that an iceberg hit it. There was a gash in the lower section of the ship.

Where did you ever hear that it was the USSR?
 

urdailywater

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
5,563
Did the titanic really sick cuz of the ice berg?I found out in the internet it was the soviets that shot it down
why did they do these? is still a mystery to me I don't believe it was and iceberg remember titanic was made of pure steel and with 16 watertight compartments...

So you will be the judge like I said is pure steel...

discuss

I feel so sad all those people die :confused:
that's one major flaw right there.

seriously, internet is like free information. it's the past, i really doubt russians shot it down and if they did then why don't any survivors actually tell us that (assuming there were some though, which I'm pretty sure there were).

i think if someone shot at us those people would keep it a secret.


also, pure steel is overrated
 

urdailywater

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
5,563
If you watched the movie you'd know the iceberg did it.
is that sarcasm...?

one thing about conspiracy theories is that you can never really use media or television as evidence against the conspirator. only if it's real footage or something. but then again that still doesn't seem to help all that much..
 

Mr.Freeman

Smash Ace
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
831
Why would the soviets want to sink a passenger liner with nobody politically or otherwise influential in any sort of way? This, and that ******** mummy's curse story I just read.
 

flaco

The Terminator
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
3,105
Location
Springfield Mass
believe it or not there was 3 important people in the titanic 3 of the military so that's why they have to shot it down.
 

ndayday

stuck on a whole different plaaaanet
BRoomer
Joined
Jun 12, 2008
Messages
19,614
Location
MI
Are you aware that you're the only person I have found to say that it was shot down by Soviets? Heck, even by Googling it, the only things that come up with Soviets and the Titanic is that it was found during a Cold War Navy mission.

The 3rd thing that showed up was this thread.

Conclusion: Internet is like a cornucopia of knowledge, different theories, etc. There are critics to anything, and if this was even a possibility, it would have already been brought up by people. Possibly.

Show us one source that agrees with you.

 

Mr.Freeman

Smash Ace
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
831
believe it or not there was 3 important people in the titanic 3 of the military so that's why they have to shot it down.[/QUOTE

I would guess they would just be low-ranking officials, nothing important. And didn't POKE just post earlier that the soviets didn't even EXIST yet?:dizzy:
 

ndayday

stuck on a whole different plaaaanet
BRoomer
Joined
Jun 12, 2008
Messages
19,614
Location
MI
ok people these right here proffs that maybe it was shot down but by someone else

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090123155215AAEepTw
You do realize they're speaking hypothetically, right?

You could basically argue this stuff forever. I think there is definitely the possibility of it happening, but I highly, highly doubt it did happen. The dates and stuff make sense, etc, but besides that, there is really no reason for it happen.

Like the link you provided says, it'd make for an interesting story. :D
 

Rici

I think I just red myself
BRoomer
Joined
Nov 23, 2005
Messages
4,670
Location
Iraq
NNID
Riciardos
Oh flaco, you never fail to amuse.
 

Scott!

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 25, 2008
Messages
1,575
Location
The Forest Temple
If anyone takes anything said on Yahoo answers as acceptable proof of anything, then they are being silly. Yahoo answers is as unreliable a site as anything you can find on the internets.

It's an interesting hypothetical, but it still didn't happen. There has been no proof presented at all, only one Yahoo Answers thread in which people consider the possibility as the basis for some historical fiction. Either find real, hard evidence of your claim, or stop making things up just for the sake of creating controversy where there is none. If this happened, there would be evidence.
 

Mota

"The snake, knowing itself, strikes swiftly"
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
4,063
Location
Australia | Melb
Kool, I've never even considered he Titanic being a conspiracy.

The movie would've been sweeter with some subs, pirates and torpedoes.
 

McFox

Spread the Love
BRoomer
Joined
Sep 9, 2001
Messages
18,783
Location
Visiting from above.
ok people these right here proffs that maybe it was shot down but by someone else

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090123155215AAEepTw
I like how Wikipedia isn't a valid source, but Yahoo Answers is.

*EDIT* In the Answer you linked to, the person asking the question says the following:

"I know that it was not really sunk by a u-boat."

Try finding sources that actually support your own theory, instead of your opponents'.
 

flaco

The Terminator
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
3,105
Location
Springfield Mass
yea they say and iceberg sunk it but i dont believe that.Remember guys when the goverment messes up they cover up
 

#HBC | Dancer

The nicest of the damned.
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
1,390
Location
Orlando, Fl
Oh that silly government of ours, always trying to cover up everything but just never seeming to succeed. When will they learn?
 

Mr.Freeman

Smash Ace
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
831
I still see no proof about anybody sinking the titanic. Im pretty sure this thread's gonna be close in a little while.
 

Neo Exdeath

Smash Ace
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
795
Location
Strawberry Fields
Did the Titanic really sink because of the iceberg?I found out in the internet it was the Soviets that shot it down.

Why did they do these? It's still a mystery to me. I don't believe it was and iceberg. Remember, the Titanic was made of pure steel and with 16 watertight compartments.

So you will be the judge like I said it is pure steel...

Discuss

I feel so sad all those people died. :confused:

What link do you speak of?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom