See the problem is that you’re coming by at this from the perspective of these being ecological ancestors/descendants of modern Pokémon. And to be fair that was the angle we were all sold at first. But once I understood what these things
really were I came to appreciate them much more.
They’re the Pokémon equivalent of old 50s horror movies or classic sci-fi stories or adventure serials. Old, corny concepts like journeying to the center of the earth to fight lizard men, or 50 foot insects destroying a city. With the specific theming of dinosaurs and robots.
“Attack of the 1000 year old Donphan!!!” “Beware the Volcarona from outer space!!!”
And because this is the Pokémon world and anything’s possible, we’re using timey-wimey sci-fi nonsense to actually bring these ridiculous creatures into our world.
And design wise, the idea of taking existing Pokemon and twisting them up into dinosaur shapes is something I never knew I wanted before it happened. It’s something kid me would’ve loved, and it’s a level of creativity that I have to respect. The Violet paradoxes are a little more tame, I wish they would’ve incorporated more cyborg elements, but I like them fine enough.
But the point with both versions is that, regardless of the lore and speaking from a purely design perspective, these aren’t meant to be real creatures. They’re
movie monsters. And I love that.
Now obviously you don’t, and that’s fine. Opinions and all. Just stop doing the thing where you don’t understand why someone likes something so you react by decrying it as dumb and bad and poopy.
Okay?