Can I just say that the idea of "playing with emotions" vs "playing with logic" being two equally solid, different methodologies of mafia play is absolutely silly and ludicrous
Mafia is a game of investigation and/or deception. Yeah, you need to be able to read emotions but that doesn't mean "emotions have their place!!!!!" and it definitely doesn't mean that playing primarily upon emotions is some other unique playstyle that is equally effective and just different in its own right.
Yeah, "people are humans and have emotions", but what's your point? Like, really? People take ****s too, but I don't remember making a point of describing the dumps I was taking between marathon posts in Bioware or Pulp Fiction. But you better believe I stopped to drop a deuce upwards of 3 times during those endgame post write-a-thons. The facts that it happened and influenced my posting slightly and was unavoidable because I'm human, funny enough, didn't make my toilet rituals somehow relevant to the game and my objectives.
I spectated Gheb's mini from early on D1 and honestly, I kind of absolutely loved doing it. Here's why -- it was the game where logic and deduction ruled the day, and the cookie jar lid slammed down on the hand of anybody (of any alignment) that tried to rely on their emotions or the emotions of others. J blatantly tried to use ATE to incriminate (and then defuse) Del when Del was needling Orbo toward the end of D2. J asked him "why are you being so insensitive??" Del countered with "I'm trying to read him; aren't you?" And what a surprise; J's attempts were fake, and Del's were real, and J got lynched. Maven was obviously tempted to follow the easy path of gut vibes and emotions and just tunnel Del, and J lurked in the background helping foster his laziness, but then Maven literally seemed to just rally within himself, made the right call, and suddenly it was like seeing J for the scum he was was some instantaneous epiphany. I consider that moment to be a triumph for DGames and I'm glad I was here to watch it happen! It's funny how obvious the right answers can look when you've eliminated all the white noise and decided to focus on things that truly matter.
If you get suspicious of someone they will bristle; that's human nature. You can spend a million hours trying to read the precise threads of their bristling but... ****ing, why? At its absolute best it's WIFOMy and the idea that you can actually, truly read emotions through a computer screen is ridiculous when even being able to do it in person as a trained professional is dicey and not always reliable. Here's an idea; go back and look at the flips you've got and think about actual concrete reasons person X did thing Y at time Z. It will always, always, always... always yield better, stronger results. Even the few times emotions might yield something of value, there will almost definitely be logic behind it. You know why Orbo looked like town in late D2 of Gheb's mini? It wasn't because he got kind of annoyed with Del dogging his ass flaps, and it wasn't because other people read his emotions correctly either. Because those emotions would be the same regardless of alignment. But there was LOGIC here too, in this somewhat emotional moment -- because Orbo showed that he truly had nothing to lose or strongly invested. He had given his reads and as much substance as he was capable of or willing to offer, and even in the face of a lynch, that was that. Reading his emotion doesn't tell you anything there that couldn't easily mean the complete opposite. Reading his behavior, as objective constructs, tells you everything.
I mean I dunno what to say back in my day I was known for burying my enemy in mountains of logic, evidence, and thoughtful inference. And it seemed to work great as either alignment. While how strong or passive or etc you play will very based on your personality, doesn't that fact just kinda say everything you need to know about mafia? Because I think it does.