I already wrote a song with my opinion on this.
http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=276226
http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=276226
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Rotom, Gyra, Heatran, Zapdos, and Zone say no.Scizor has remained the most prevalent Pokemon since the release of Platinum, is he Uber?
which is why he was banned.And before you say anything, I know it's not the same thing. I just couldn't find a better example.
>>implying that counters are needed to take down a Pokémonthe only counter to salamence is cressy, who is f'd in the A by t-tar, scizor, weavile, and a few others
you see, you have to predict right, what if you switch in on a fire blast? you're screwed since he'll EQ next turn
uncounterable is by no means grounds for a ban look at metaknight in brawl he has no legit counters on any stage except for FD for falco and diddy but did he get banned? nope not by a longshot (this is coming from someone who is pro MK-ban)heatran pretty much gets ***** by swampert if it doesn't have HP grass (and most sets don't since earth power, fire blast, and explosion hit everything else harder)
blissey is owned by pretty much any fighting type
infernape is walled by vaporeon unless it carries focus blast and we know how reliable that is
gyarados is ***** by rotom and jolteon fears nothing but the rare EQ
t-tar is beated by bulky ground types
specs latias 2HKO'd at worse everything else in the metagame and outran 85% of it and the ones that it didn't outrun it pretty much OHKO'd anyways, scarftar was used to beat this thing and that's not a good set at all, it also doesn't help that this thing was friggen bulky and carrying trick means she beat blissey
we all know garchomp
salamence is almost the same reasoning as latias except more damaging and less bulky, and much harder to switch into, you're carrying a steel type just for this ****er and even then, unless it's scarftran (who doesn't outspeed salamence after a DD), they're not winning, most teams carry 1 check for pokes, you need to carry at least 2 for salamence
with salamence gone, the metagame becomes more balanced and goes to a fire/water/grass base metagame
What the **** are you talking aboutheatran pretty much gets ***** by swampert if it doesn't have HP grass (and most sets don't since earth power, fire blast, and explosion hit everything else harder)
blissey is owned by pretty much any fighting type
infernape is walled by vaporeon unless it carries focus blast and we know how reliable that is
gyarados is ***** by rotom and jolteon fears nothing but the rare EQ
t-tar is beated by bulky ground types
specs latias 2HKO'd at worse everything else in the metagame and outran 85% of it and the ones that it didn't outrun it pretty much OHKO'd anyways, scarftar was used to beat this thing and that's not a good set at all, it also doesn't help that this thing was friggen bulky and carrying trick means she beat blissey
If you have no intent of basing an argument, stop posting. If we "can't realize why" you have your stance, it has nothing to do with your talent as a player, it is because you refuse to state your case. Also do not assume that the stance of another is a permanent one, you devalue your peers in an unnecessary manner. Do not create barriers to logic when none are necessary.I don't need to convince you because I don't need to prove anything to you, if you can't realize why, like I and most of the smarter players out there have, then that's your problem. I really just don't feel like turning this into a pointless argument because that's all it'll become. I already know you have your opinion set in your mind and I am not changing it, so why bother?
I found this incredibly ironic.umbreon said:As for being a "smarter" player, I don't care who you are, I'll trash you at this game. Keep your ego in check.
Rules: Ladder Match, Sleep Clause, Freeze Clause, OHKO Clause, Evasion Clause, Species Clause, Strict Damage ClauseReliable Mence counter = Offensive Trick Room (w/ Heatproof) Bronzong
Bronzong @ Macho Brace
Brave / Heatproof
252 HP / 252 Atk / 4 Def (0 Spe IVs)
~Trick Room
~Gyro Ball
~Earthquake
~Explode
Keep Salamence in OU.
I just proved all of this wrong in my above post...cressy again, decently walls lucario
and lucario is revenged killed by anything with mach punch
oh, and lucario is counterable, but it's set dependant
you can counter his physical set with pretty much any decent physical wall and his special set with any decent special wall not snorlax (STAB aura spheres hurt)
salamence is always going mixed, he pretty much is gaurenteed to OHKO anything that is weak to one of his moves, and after 1 DD, he can sweep an entire team
salamence is the only OU poke in which is uncounterable (basically since cressy is **** in OU play nowadays) and requires your team to have 2-3 solid checks to defeat him, meaning your revolving your team on defeating salamence
he is overcentralizing the metagame, even if he is weak to SR, he only needs 1 switch in and 1 set-up turn to completely **** a team, while no, he's not as bad as garchomp or latias (who didn't even need a start-up turn), he's still pretty bad and removing him from standard play will benefit this generation
that's one example of you predicting right, if he EQ'd or FB'd on the turn you switched in, you're ****ed, it's a check, not a counter
Correct it isn't full proof, but it will definitely work if your predicting skills are so so and your opponent is always caught off guard.If he switched out you still countered him =/
BTW, +0 Salamence Earthquake against Bronzong 75.1% - 88.8%
So if it Earthquakes on the switch then you're dead.
Don't be a troll yannick =/.LOL hang on a sec.
Yup
I wasn't seeing things.
There are really more than seventy posts about this.
You guys are actually discussing this, LOL. This is ridiculous.