Personally, I don't even think it's worth arguing about his size and shadow any more: I think his playable FOR SURE this time.
I made a post a few pages back saying that the way Sakurai waited to give no info about ridley since the direct would not even make any sense to just REVEAL him as hazard. The only way that my logic would not make any sense is that Sakurai would be unaware of his popularity which is practically impossible since he acknowledged megaman and mewtwo.
For a quick recap, all the argumentation about the potd quote and the direct all leads to one simple fact: those "info" was purposely done so that we can't be sure by putting ALL the evidences with doubles sense. Those evidences all points to 2 distinct possibilities:
Sakurai is hiding his playability
and
Sakurai is hyping the fact that he's an hazard.
But here's the catch it's not just the evidence, it's the whole way that Sakurai took which leads to the same possibilities (in other words, he did this either because of the 2 outcome listed above).
This was done on April 8, 2 months before E3 and now, a month passed without any info but Nintendo has started the E3 hype which means that any hype kill would be a HUGE let down and if you look at
http://e3.nintendo.com/, you can see the line "Game fans, this is the one you’ve been waiting for. Tune in to the Nintendo Digital Event at
9 a.m. PT for a look at what’s in store for 2014 and beyond." with a big title saying "save the date" and an option to save it to a calendar such as google. I think we can agree that they want you to get hyped so you don't want to disappoint the people here.
However, revealing ridley as hazard via potd during this time would do the opposite and unlike if it was posted let's say a week after the direct, it would kill the hype but come back to normal after and still have time to actually get people hyped for E3.
So, it wouldn't make any sense to reveal him as hazard here and at E3, it would make even less sense because the goal of the E3 is to keep people excited which includes showing a lot of info kept secret until this event to concentrate the excitation after it so that people would be motivated to buy games after this summer. They want to remember that they have X games during the summer but here, it would again the opposite again. You're noticing that on EVERY deconfirmation, Sakurai do it directly either to NOT get people hyped for a character that was somewhat popular. Now, I can agree that it's opinion that he did not do this for ridley but I think it is undeniable that because he would have known about the request, revealing him at E3 directly after being ambiguous would likely bring MASSIVE disappointment which is what Nintendo is trying to NOT do.
The only time left would just be after E3 or no info until release but they don't make any sense because it's clear that Sakurai did the situation for an unknown purpose. Revealing him there would just means that there was no purpose which contradicts with what I just said. Remember he's either hiding his playability or hyping hazard and revealing as hazard here would just not bring the hype he would have wanted. This is also true for his playability because it would have been done on E3 to get people hyped and since there's no possibility for him to be revealed playable on any potd and that he would have talked about it before the release, then there's only one outcome possible:
RIDLEY IS PLAYABLE AND IT WILL BE REVEALED AT E3!!!
No one got any counter to this argument on my last opinion posts. You can't call me delusional unless you're saying that my logic is flawed (if it's the case, then please quote this and tell me what's wrong). I only used deduction based on actual facts no interpretation or ambiguity.
So, I can finally prove that ridley is playable by facts and logic only and please, if you are claiming that I am delusional, then, feel free to quote this. It would be VERY appreciated because, unlike others, I would admit my mistake, but only if there's mistakes.