8-peacock-8
Smash Hero
Add Mother Brain to the supporter list!
EDIT: DAMN AUTO CORRECT CRAP
EDIT: DAMN AUTO CORRECT CRAP
Last edited:
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Sorry, I couldn't resist...Add Mother Brian to the supporter list!
Apparently my phone though i typed in Brian instead of Brain.Sorry, I couldn't resist...
Your cellphone or whatever thinks "brain" is a misspelling? XDAdd Mother Brain to the supporter list!
EDIT: DAMN AUTO CORRECT CRAP
Here you go.Be sure to show your appreciation, I spent at least 20 minutes on this.
Ridley moves it around like a chess piece.How would Mother Brain be a stage hazard, does the big capsule containing the brain even move?
The capsule could've come up through hatches on the floor, then retreated when she took enough damage. Maybe at some point, she stomps around in the lava, swiping at players from the background.How would Mother Brain be a stage hazard, does the big capsule containing the brain even move?
ONE OF USIt seems like a sort of Smashboards "initiation" for someone to write up a lengthy "too big" post. Today is my time.
Adam West needs to play Ridley in the live action Metroid movie now.Actually, Mother Brain isn't using an attack in this picture she is just using the Ridley equivalent of the bat signal.
It's always a pleasure to show you guys my mad paint skills =p
Would you believe me if I told you that I made this beautiful pic in less than 30 seconds ?
Nice! Make more!Actually, Mother Brain isn't using an attack in this picture she is just using the Ridley equivalent of the bat signal.
It's always a pleasure to show you guys my mad paint skills =p
Would you believe me if I told you that I made this beautiful pic in less than 30 seconds ?
SHUN THE MAGSTOND3!!!!!I SAY WE KILL THE BEAST!!!!!
Nanananananananana RIDLEY! RIDLEY!!!Adam West needs to play Ridley in the live action Metroid movie now.
Pink Ranger!Actually, Mother Brain isn't using an attack in this picture she is just using the Ridley equivalent of the bat signal.
It's always a pleasure to show you guys my mad paint skills =p
Would you believe me if I told you that I made this beautiful pic in less than 30 seconds ?
NO!Pink Ranger!
When it comes to the size argument, the biggest thing surrounding the issue is consistency. Usually, pro-Ridley like to point the fact that Bowser was massively scaled. But here's the major problem.1. Ridley is TOO DAMN BIG!
Now I'm sure everyone's heard this one before, and it's seriously getting old considering all of the people who have argued against it, so I'm going to jump on that bandwagon right now.
Ridley's size has frequently changed throughout the Metroid franchise, so why should Smash Bros be any different?
Here's Ridley in the original Metroid for NES...
Hardly bigger than Samus! Well, it was probably due to graphical limitations, right? Well then here's Ridley is Super Metroid, his most iconic appearance.
Ridley is only about twice Samus's size. Before you go on to say that that's still pretty big, I'm going to agree with you. But it's not TOO big. Bowser has appeared even bigger. Take his Super Mario 64 appearance for example.
"So long gay Bowser!"
Bowser is 4 times Mario's size, and this is him without any magical spells or whatever. It's Bowser, plain and simple, and really big.
Now considering that Mario is around 4 ft, and Samus is around 6 ft with her Varia Suit on, that would mean that Super Mario 64 Bowser is 16 ft tall and Super Metroid Ridley is 12 ft tall.
That's smaller than Bowser! And Bowser looks fine in Smash Bros, doesn't he?
Which leads me to my next point about resizing characters. Bowser in Super Mario 64 is 4 times Mario's size, while in Smash Bros...
Bowser is about twice Mario's size! This means that Bowser has been shrunken down to half his canon size. That's a big difference.
And it's not unlike fighting games to have big characters anyway. Take Mortal Kombat for example, a game full of humongous characters that you can play as. So even if Ridley was the biggest character in the game (which isn't an impossibility) it would still be okay, since many fighting games do have characters that are quite big compared to the normal fighters.
3. Ridley has already stapled himself as a boss in the Smash universe!
This argument doesn't really help you. One thing to keep in mind is the weight of each appearance. I played Smash 64, and I didn't even remember Ridley appearing in the background until people mentioned it. The Melee introduction, again, is a mere seconds cameo. Brawl, on the other hand, is a full-fledged boss fight, and 2 of them at that. To visualize the weight of each appearance, think of it like this:Wrong. Ridley started Smash as a background element in the Metroid stage for Smash 64. Since then his role has grew, being featured in the Melee introduction and eventually becoming a boss in Brawl, as many are quick to point out. But take into account Ridley's diverse history with Smash Bros, and tell me with all seriousness that a playable role is not the next step.
For us Ridley supporters, it goes something like this:64: Background -> Melee: Intro Cameo -> Brawl: Two Boss Fights
Actually in regards to the inconsistency of Bowser's size, I would argue that it is consistent within the main stream of Mario games, with the exception of spin offs (which I have already addressed, I believe) and instances of Bowzilla (which... doesn't exactly help Bowser's size justification argument). Outside of those appearances, Bowser is almost always well over twice the size of Mario, as others have already pointed out, yet he was re-scaled for his playable appearances. I believe the same can be done with Ridley.I guess I'll bring up some counterarguments that people tend to ignore or overlook...
When it comes to the size argument, the biggest thing surrounding the issue is consistency. Usually, pro-Ridley like to point the fact that Bowser was massively scaled. But here's the major problem.
No one cares about consistency for the Mario series. The Mario series is one of Nintendo's most inconsistent series. The Mario series doesn't care about consistency. In one game, Mario is jumping through paintings. In other games, he's cleaning up an island, he's flying through space, he's playing boardgames, he's go karting with his archnemesis.
Exhibition B: the Zelda series. Zelda is notorious for its multiple timelines (actually multiverse), but Miyamoto at least attempts to make a coherent, functional continuity. An interesting point is that Smash 4 Link is not his Skyward Sword incarnation, but rather his Twilight Princess. Why? So Zelda (and most likely Sheik and Ganondorf) are consistent with Link.
Now of course, the Metroid series. The Metroid series is one of Nintendo's very few A-listed franchises that has a complete timeline from Metroid 1 to Metroid Fusion. What was one of the major, major shortcomings of Other M? Breaking consistency, both with plot and Samus's character.
Lastly, the Olimar argument: this one is easy to argue against. Scaling Olimar up is fine because it's relative size. No one cares about absolute size. If you take everything from Olimar's universe (i.e. Distant Planet, the Bulborb, the soda can backdrop), they are scaled to Olimar. In other words, taking elements from Metroid would mean scaling to Samus. Case in point: Mother Brain is signicantly larger than Samus.
This argument doesn't really help you. One thing to keep in mind is the weight of each appearance. I played Smash 64, and I didn't even remember Ridley appearing in the background until people mentioned it. The Melee introduction, again, is a mere seconds cameo. Brawl, on the other hand, is a full-fledged boss fight, and 2 of them at that. To visualize the weight of each appearance, think of it like this:
64: Background -> Melee: Intro Cameo -> Brawl: Two Boss Fights
It also doesn't help that Brawl is the most recent iteration, therefore making it the most recent Ridley appearance that people remember. It's not a simple case of selective cherry picking, Brawl easily has the most weight that contributes to Ridley's perception of size.
The background. His appearance is akin to King DeDeDe in the Dreamland stage, or the buzzard in Kongo Jungle (64). It's actually just a super-compressed Super Metroid sprite; zooming in on it makes you be all likeI forget, where in Smash 64's Planet Zebes stage is Ridley?
CAN I GET AN A-MENUgh. I can't wait for him to be announced so people will shut up about his size.
A-MENCAN I GET AN A-MEN
"If you know what I mea-- HEADSHOT"Ugh. I can't wait for him to be announced so people will shut up about his size.
Finding a smart comment in GameFAQs must've like finding a needle in a haystack.Found a great quote on GameFAQs of all places:
"You know what's fun about arguing against Ridley? You don't have to put in any work. You can get away with saying something looks stupid or disproportionate or silly and treat it as valid proof."
"If you know what I mea-- HEADSHOT"
You don't really have to put any effort in arguing for or against Ridley anyways, it is a template debate as of current.Found a great quote on GameFAQs of all places:
"You know what's fun about arguing against Ridley? You don't have to put in any work. You can get away with saying something looks stupid or disproportionate or silly and treat it as valid proof."
Amun RaCAN I GET AN A-MEN
ALL THE POSTS IN THIS THREAD GETTIN LIKESRUN MORBID IS BACK!!!!!!!!!:o