SmasherP83
Smash Ace
This guy.I don't understand the point in arguing over a character's chances when th game is going to be released in 3 weeks and we will most likely know the full roster in a week and a half
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
This guy.I don't understand the point in arguing over a character's chances when th game is going to be released in 3 weeks and we will most likely know the full roster in a week and a half
Yep, I understand. I'm not sure if I can change your mind though. All I can say is that he has been very consistent in the deconfirmations, and is in line with his opinion on fake hype. What you think is up to you.It's a known fact that humans like to observe patterns even where there are none. That's what this argument looks like to me.
LOLZ Honestly that's what i been doing on this forum since brawl was announced and only until recently decided to join in on the "fun".44 users, 34 guests? What is this, a Colosseum? Are you all spectators watching a bunch of internet guys arguing themselves to death?.
Cool. Entree fee is $5, cough up.LOLZ Honestly that's what i been doing on this forum since brawl was announced and only until recently decided to join in on the "fun".
he did it againY'know, using big words doesn't make you right.
Incase I missed you:LOLZ Honestly that's what i been doing on this forum since brawl was announced and only until recently decided to join in on the "fun".
Devil's advocate is when you pretend to be the opposite, in this case, a detractor, and 2000 is when everything will start glitchingdevil's advocate shenanigans
...I was making fun of you. I knew what you meant, how could you possibly think I didn't know what you meant? Once again, I was making fun of your lack of a proper sentence. Either state exactly what you mean to say, or go away.I worded quite explicitly in that post you quoted that I was referring to his playability, I made no question of his appearance in the game in some form.
Thus, it seems like you have a severe reading comprehension issue when you assert that I expressed my thoughts in a way that implied anything else. Anyone who understands English can read the post and see how I mentioned multiple times the word "playability".
Opposite....Well I'm used to my "test of sarcasm" on the interent thing so maybe but I'm not a Ridley hater as some may think.Devil's advocate is when you pretend to be the opposite, in this case, a detractor, and 2000 is when everything will start glitching
Okay... I had finished reading everything, when I posted on Miiverse for someone to help me from turning...but it was already too late. The evidence was too convincing to ignore, and I spiraled into a mental breakdown.Well, first I was a detractor because I thought he wouldn't fit and the boss thing, then I saw he could've been shrunk and the boss didn't have to be the original Ridley, but didn't really want him, so I was then neutral, them I saw how important Ridley is to the series and now I think he should be playable.
That article is certainly interesting (although rather old), but unfortunately it doesn't assist the idea that Ridley is suggested to be playable. Sometimes people will fan hype no matter the case, and the thing that bothers me about Ridley hype specifically is I find it to be almost 98% community conceived, and 2% the rest falling on the cameo in the April direct.Yep, I understand. I'm not sure if I can change your mind though. All I can say is that he has been very consistent in the deconfirmations, and is in line with his opinion on fake hype. What you think is up to you.
EDIT: Am I linking too much? I really hope I'm not. I just included it in case you read over one of my posts.
Not supposed to do that either, lest we attract the wrath of mod.Opposite....Well I'm used to my "test of sarcasm" on the interent thing so maybe but I'm not a Ridley hater as some may think.
"An enemy from Samus's past may appear at any moment."That article is certainly interesting (although rather old), but unfortunately it doesn't assist the idea that Ridley is suggested to be playable. Sometimes people will fan hype no matter the case, and the thing that bothers me about Ridley hype specifically is I find it to be almost 98% community conceived, and 2% the rest falling on the cameo in the April direct.
People keep using the word teasing as if it's been some long ordeal. He was "teased" once. One time only. The tip of his wing and his shadow. That's it.
If "An enemy from Samus' past" doesn't refer to Ridley then I don't know what does. Ridley has been alluded to twice for sure.People keep using the word teasing as if it's been some long ordeal. He was "teased" once. One time only. The tip of his wing and his shadow. That's it.
Seriously, this post makes me think you are suffering a mental illness....I was making fun of you. I knew what you meant, how could you possibly think I didn't know what you meant? Once again, I was making fun of your lack of a proper sentence. Either state exactly what you mean to say, or go away.
Actually, scratch that, just go away even if you do state exactly what you mean.
And now that that's over with, I shall do the smart thing and start ignoring him. I have a lot of practice at ignoring people, so I should be fine.
Well I'll try to tone it down a bit since people tend to get mad at me in the wrong idea...I don't talk about Ridley a lot so I really don't know.Not supposed to do that either, lest we attract the wrath of mod.
All that aside, is there even anything left to discuss at this point? We've done movesets, alts, victory/defeat poses, taunts... several times each, I think?
Thanks for the link! I actually hadn't read that yet and find it very interesting...Yep, I understand. I'm not sure if I can change your mind though. All I can say is that he has been very consistent in the deconfirmations, and is in line with his opinion on fake hype. What you think is up to you.
EDIT: Am I linking too much? I really hope I'm not. I just included it in case you read over one of my posts.
There's only one thing left to do..... EVENTS!Not supposed to do that either, lest we attract the wrath of mod.
All that aside, is there even anything left to discuss at this point? We've done movesets, alts, victory/defeat poses, taunts... several times each, I think?
Being in a permanent Mega Mushroom: Too big or not too big?There's only one thing left to do..... EVENTS!
What event matches you think would involve Ridley?
Posted an idea awhile back: Fight Giant Ridley as Little Mac. Event name "The Opposite of a Lack of Common Sense."There's only one thing left to do..... EVENTS!
What event matches you think would involve Ridley?
You crossed a line there telling she has mental illness. Just go away you and your nice vocabulary that doesn't impress anybody.Seriously, this post makes me think you are suffering a mental illness.
You say you understood what I meant.
You're trying to make fun of my "lack of proper sentence"...even though all my sentences were proper and asserted my point in the exact way I intended it to be asserted?
The very first sentence I mention Ridley, I use the word "playability". There was no vagueness that could lead to confusion. I was concise and explicit. You have reading comprehension issues. It worries me that people let you post things on the internet, even.
Space pirates use phaser cannons and other forms of practical technobabble, not cannonballs.Something tells me i need to repost my cannonballs to all of the new users who gave up on ridley because of the article and the video being posted again.
Well, yes, no. We did kind of create the hype ourselves, but that's because we decided to look further into the footage. Our straw-grasping skills are unmatched by any other character fanbase. We found that, if you compared the shadow of Ridley to other shadows (and one I think still should be added to the 2nd post, MegaMan's shadow after he jumps off his dog thingmadoodle), and took the way the shadows work into consideration, Ridley would have been severely downscaled from his Other M size. We noticed that pattern thing too, and got curious as to why Ridley had to be the exception again. It didn't add up, at least for us.That article is certainly interesting (although rather old), but unfortunately it doesn't assist the idea that Ridley is suggested to be playable. Sometimes people will fan hype no matter the case, and the thing that bothers me about Ridley hype specifically is I find it to be almost 98% community conceived, and 2% the rest falling on the cameo in the April direct.
Heh. Ridley's existence was first teased at over a year ago. If a long wait full of the tension of uncertainity and fears of the PotD of death, and the pressure of the hatebase, doesn't count as an ordeal, then I don't know what does.People keep using the word teasing as if it's been some long ordeal. He was "teased" once. One time only. The tip of his wing and his shadow. That's it.
Aaaaand this is the point where we drop this discussion. Nobody is going to convince anyone obviously, and I might not be a moderator but I can definitely sense when things have gone too far and people can't express themselves without throwing out insults. Stop this ****ty discussion.Seriously, this post makes me think you are suffering a mental illness.
"These guys were bosses in their own game and their characters"Part 2 shadow analyze
Part 2 of the shadow analysis: Before we start, I would like to address one more thing out of Part 1:
HE DECONFIRMED RIDLEY!
When the footage was shown in the Yellow Devil section, he never mentioned Ridley as another boss; He only heavily implied so.
He also deconfirms characters without beating around the bush, as with Waluigi, Ashley, Dillon, Wonder Red...
Sakurai:
"We didn’t introduce ALL of the Assist Trophies in the Smash Bros. Direct. Here’s Dillon from Dillon’s Rolling Western!! He may rival Sonic in the art of rolling.
This is his trophy. He may be an animal, and his buckles are definitely on the adorable side, but there’s no denying he looks cool!! His Assist Trophy can even do things like a quick charge."
Sakurai:
"The Wonderful 100!! We also made trophies of some of the other Wonderful Ones."
There's a precedence of deconfirming characters directly. Ridley was not directly deconfirmed, so his chances still remain high.
EDIT
http://s4.postimg.org/5tqojhmi3/uhh.png
This is an even better explamation of where im getting at.
Anyhow, onto the second part.
HE'S HUGE!
Yeah, about that...
Okay, yeah, it DOES looks huge, but his shadow doesn't cover the central platform with the little pegs there.
Why is that relevant? Well, look at this picture.
His shadow is not as big as the center platform, which means he is smaller than he lets on.
Plus, his wings give off the illusion that his body is enormous.
But if we take some measurements...
We can see that his wingspan far exceeds his body.
And if we exclude the wings of the shadow picture above:
Wow, that's so much smaller.
And another thing:
the shadow does stretch out at points, so its an illusion to make Ridley much larger than he appears to be:
Not only is the shadow much larger, but the bottom is really stretched.
HE'S A BOSS CHARACTER, NOT A PLAYABLE CHARACTER!
Possible, but the exact quote was:
"Boss characters makes appearances in other stages, not just this one."
Why say boss characters?
I mean, these guys are/were bosses in their own games at some point, and they're characters.
Yes, even good ol' DK. So we can't rule out vague diction.
Another point against him being a boss: Did you notice Pikachu actually escapes Ridley?
Now this was a few moments before Ridley started flying again.So how did Pikachu escape without any struggle? He was definitely not struggling.
According to the wiki on grabs, if your damage is at 0%, you can escape without struggle in about six seconds.
But the absolute weirdest sign is that just before the footage fade out, he may have jumped.
View attachment 12399
Compare with Brawl Ridley(s). Their movement is so smooth and well-telegraphed, much like most bosses in other games.
Compare with shadow footage Ridley. His movement is so jerky, much like how every character throughout the Smash Bros. series moves.
For all we know, that quote could mean anything.
SIZE COMPARION
Alright, let's start with the most important thing in my opinion: his hand and tail.
Pictured: Ridley's hand.
Pictured: Ridley's tail. (Estimated)
Because these shadows are on a wall, the only thing that can distort it is a zoom in effect on the picture. But since the shadows mostly stay true to the size of the characters, these are at least 80% accurate to actual size, in my opinion.
And it took me a while, but I found a another character shadow on the pillar, Donkey Kong.
At 2:29, look at the pillar, slow down the video, and don't blink.
That's my estimate, but I'm probably off on the fill in, so keep that in mind.
Ridley's tail talon is no where near Donkey Kong's height. It is most likely only 1/2 ish of Donkey Kong's height.
and his hand is only 1/6 of Donkey Kong's height.
Onto the hand!
Picture A: Ridley's size in Other M.
Picture B: angel glory's resized Ridley holding Samus.
Judging by the hand picture, if we increase the size of the hand shadow by a few knuckles, doing so would most likely yield Ridley's size from Picture B.
As for his tail, it's most likely this size:
Left: This is the size of Ridley's tail in Other M as compared to Samus.
Right: This is the estimated size of Ridley's tail in Sm4sh as compared to Pikachu.
Credit to @Dalek_Kolt for this
Assuming the blob above is Pikachu, roughly six Ridley tails can fit inside Pikachu.
Therefore, Ridley's range of sizes are these, hardly boss-sized.
Ridley's largest size:
Ridley's smallest size:
Size comparison with Bigley and Smalley:
Bonus Yellow Devil comparison.
Next up his head:
And now the best part of them all: Body comparisons!
his head is right there and my estimates are correct by his head size and kirbys shadow (which will be a little lower on this post)
is 2/3 or 1/2 ridleys head
Okay, I gathered a few pictures of as many character's shadows as possible. (If you want to help me with this part, you can find me some full shadow pictures of other characters that aren't being covered by other obstructing/obscuring objects.)
As I mentioned earlier, Ridley's wings make him look a lot bigger, so for estimation purposes, I excluded the wings for size comparison. Also keep in mind that these aren't 100% perfect.
Heeeeeere we go
Charizard
Source:
at 2:01
Kirby
Source:
Go to 1:25
(Don't blink and you will see it. This took me many attempts to get this one.)
Zero Suit Samus (And by extension, Samus)
Source:
http://smashbros-miiverse.com/
you will see it under the correct categorys
Greninja
(this one was Really tough)
well that's what I got you want more you can help for finding more shadows of other characters or better pictures or mention anything I missed I will post it for a part 3 (sectioned missed arguments)
See Charizard for the source, and go to 1:38.
(With a keen eye, you can see Greninja's shadow)
Rosalina
(This is by far the most useful for arguments, because Rosalina and Bowser are almost the exact same height.)
(yes I know because of how she is its the best I can do)
Rosalina is almost as large as Ridley's whole body!
Source:
Go to 2:18.
(but if you guys/girls not commenced by this see if you can get me a better Rosalina shadow)
Ok Bowser is next
The Next picture is where the shadow is.
(picture by @majora_787)
So, with this now without a further ado. Here is the pin points.
Blue, & Green, = shadow positions.
Red, & Yellow, = Approximate measurement of the shadow over here.
Hehehe look at that "Bowsers shadow is almost as big as Ridleys."
Source:
http://smashbros-miiverse.com/
you will see it under the correct categorys
And going back to Rosalina's shadow.
Like I Said Rosalina, & Bowser Are Almost the same Height
Megaman & Pikachu
This is by far the most useful of them all megaman is in the air and is almost the same height as ridley (in the air wise).
So I decided to reverse the pin points on this one.
And sure enough I could do Ridleys pin points in this megaman picture.
Look at that Megaman's shadow is 2/3s of Ridleys Shadow.
(and if you look at pikachus shadow its 98% the same size as his own shadow when Ridley grabbed Pikachu.)
Source:
http://smashbros-miiverse.com/
you will see it under the correct categorys
and now the best for last
I did Mother Brain, but I did Ridley's shadow points instead.
(The green dot is on the other size because that's his foot. And since Pikachu is on the other side, I need to use his other foot for reference.)
Wait a Second Ridley shadow is smaller than mother brains
look at these
Ridley has always been bigger than Mother Brain, (Well, except for the NES, but Zero Mission retconned that) so why is Mother Brain's shadow now bigger than Ridley's?
so what are you thoughts
link to part 1
http://smashboards.com/threads/the-...ii-u-3ds-thread.324284/page-636#post-16727842]
I just want RIdley to look intimidating/ disappointed. It'll look appropriate when Zero Suit Samus wins and pokes fun at Ridley during the victory screen similar to Fox and Falco in brawl.So, do you guys think Ridley would clap in someone else's victory? I'd kind of like him to be turned away fuming to himself, a little like Snake in brawl.
Seriously, we're the bad guys when crap like this gets pulled?Aaaaand this is the point where we drop this discussion. Nobody is going to convince anyone obviously, and I might not be a moderator but I can definitely sense when things have gone too far and people can't express themselves without throwing out insults. Stop this ****ty discussion.
I think the tubes will burst open if you stand on the platforms too long and they release trauma gas which causes you to go into a monologue. that's the stage hazardI think the purple tubes will have a rocket feature to go around the Pyrosphere.