NekuShikazu
Smash Journeyman
I hate to believe that leaks are real but this leak seems pretty real. But then again, it's not hard to make assumptions or guesses.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
But it's hard to make 8 guesses and don't guess anything wrong, especially when you guess Wii Fit Trainer, the name Mii Fighters and GreninjaI hate to believe that leaks are real but this leak seems pretty real. But then again, it's not hard to make assumptions or guesses.
He never mentioned Greninja.But it's hard to make 8 guesses and don't guess anything wrong, especially when you guess Wii Fit Trainer, the name Mii Fighters and Greninja
He did mention an X/Y Pokémon right before it was revealed. Even though he never mentined it by name, it's clear that he knew somethingHe never mentioned Greninja.
Mentioning Pokemon X/Y isn't really a guess since it's insanely predictable that one gen 6 (5? I don't even remember) pokemon would make an appearance. But yes, it is likely that this person knows something we don't for guessing so many characters.He did mention an X/Y Pokémon right before it was revealed. Even though he never mentined it by name, it's clear that he knew something
He probably did, but something that vague can't be credited to him. "Pokemon from x/y" could have easily been attributed to a Pokemon Trainer, one of 70 odd individual Pokemon or one of the new Mega Evolutions.He did mention an X/Y Pokémon right before it was revealed. Even though he never mentined it by name, it's clear that he knew something
It's not insanely predictable. Very few people actually predicted an X/Y Pokémon (if I remember correctly, the most predicted X/Y contenders were Sylveon and Pokémon Trainer from Kalos). So, although I agree Greninja's guess isn't as strong of a proof that Sal is right as the others guesses, it's still a rather good evidence towards him being rightMentioning Pokemon X/Y isn't really a guess since it's insanely predictable that one gen 6 (5? I don't even remember) pokemon would make an appearance. But yes, it is likely that this person knows something we don't for guessing so many characters.
http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/633202-super-smash-bros-for-wii-u/68488050It's not insanely predictable. Very few people actually predicted an X/Y Pokémon (if I remember correctly, the most predicted X/Y contenders were Sylveon and Pokémon Trainer from Kalos). So, although I agree Greninja's guess isn't as strong of a proof that Sal is right as the others guesses, it's still a rather good evidence towards him being right
Ahhh... the joys of people thinking that we would have Brawl+Mewtwo.
Well, I guess there's nothing I can say right now
Greninja was decided very early on, which means the roster wasn't completed when the tipster saw the initial roster, either Rosalina was the only last minute addition or we're getting more than the leak saysGeez, you people will try to reject everything that doesn't fit YOUR vision of what Smash 4 will be.
Some stuff about this leak interested me, so here's my thoughts on a couple:
- Sal's tipper got most every character right thus far, though some characters were named differently that what was originally predicted. The only one that probably caught him off guard was Rosalina- I'm guessing the tipper got his hands on some documentation before all the newcomers were finally decided on. This doesn't necessarily mean we might get more newcomers than what the Gematsu leak gives us, but it is something to think about.
- The whole "Pokemon from X/Y" deal was probably what Sal's tipper got from roster documents before Greninja was actually settled on.
Except Sakurai said that all characters were decided at the start of production, including Greninja who appears to have been named in his concept art.Geez, you people will try to reject everything that doesn't fit YOUR vision of what Smash 4 will be.
Some stuff about this leak interested me, so here's my thoughts on a couple:
- Sal's tipper got most every character right thus far, though some characters were named differently that what was originally predicted. The only one that probably caught him off guard was Rosalina- I'm guessing the tipper got his hands on some documentation before all the newcomers were finally decided on. This doesn't necessarily mean we might get more newcomers than what the Gematsu leak gives us, but it is something to think about.
- The whole "Pokemon from X/Y" deal was probably what Sal's tipper got from roster documents before Greninja was actually settled on.
You don't know the exact concept art Sakurai saw. That was years ago now.Except Sakurai said that all characters were decided at the start of production, including Greninja who appears to have been named in his concept art.
Just an FYI, Meta Knight is definitely NOT a villain. Wario is debatablyI know it's a very dry topic at this point; but I expect more characters than the leak.
I expect more villains and clones to be addressed, considering that clones, lack of female fighters, and the lack of villains were the major issues with Brawl's roster( to my understanding). Sakurai has addressed the ladies, as did the leak. The leak hinted at clones (albeit semi clones) with the Ness/Lucas thing. We only have two villains right now; Bowser and Dedede. We're missing Wario and Ganondorf (who have alot going for them), Wolf (overlap in the clone/semi clone area), and Metaknight. We have the Smash Direct trophies hinting at possible Zelda and Metroid newcomers, who very well be villains (I want Vaati, with all these wind moves and what not). There's the heavily teased Ridley, whether he is a boss or playable. We haven't seen many bosses. There's the Kremlings and the hope for K Rool.
It just seems like there has been so much more hinted at for us to only get the leak. It could be, but I feel like the leak is lacking in the villain department and that seemed to be something the would address since they heard the plea for female characters.
Wario is a Villain Protagonist really. I'd say he counts.Just an FYI, Meta Knight is definitely NOT a villain. Wario is debatably
Dedede is the main antagonist of the Kirby series. In recent games he's more of a rival, but he's still the main antagonist of the series and he's basically extremely greedy regardless.wario probably like chaotic neutral, but isn't DDD more like a rival? <_>
Furthering the need for villains when many people wouldn't consider Wario, MKnight, and Dedede full time villains. If the Robot Chicken bits of the Digital Event are anything to go by, along with the weird Dark Pit cameo (please dont be a separate character), the Ridley tease, and the Kremlings; the villains have been referenced but none given.Just an FYI, Meta Knight is definitely NOT a villain. Wario is debatably
Well Chorus Men AND Wii Fit are enough.I hate to believe that leaks are real but this leak seems pretty real. But then again, it's not hard to make assumptions or guesses.
Chorus Men aren't confirmed (Yet), and Wii Fit Trainer could be him having gotten E3 specific information around that time.Well Chorus Men AND Wii Fit are enough.
He did mention Pac-Man in the first leak, there was no thing such as "timing"I see a lot of people saying that the leak could be just very accurate guesses. OK sure, extremely small chance if being guesses but the chance is still there.
HOWEVER
Everyone is ignoring another statistical variable in the chance the leak is a guess. Timing. What are the chances a person could accurately make those guesses AND make them in the correct order at the right time. The first leak made no mention of PacMan or Palutena, etc. instead we got leaks next to be revealed.
Hellooooo, that's practically impossible.
Not to split hairs, but the order was actually off. The initial rumor listed Pac-Man, Mii and Little Mac. Rosalina was unveiled before any of those three; and Greninja also broke the order, being unveiled between Mac and Mii.I see a lot of people saying that the leak could be just very accurate guesses. OK sure, extremely small chance if being guesses but the chance is still there.
HOWEVER
Everyone is ignoring another statistical variable in the chance the leak is a guess. Timing. What are the chances a person could accurately make those guesses AND make them in the correct order at the right time. The first leak made no mention of PacMan or Palutena, etc. instead we got leaks next to be revealed.
Hellooooo, that's practically impossible.
Leak is real side only has to fight against nitpicking <_>This is how I see it.. both sides of the argument have to explain how the holes in their side of the argument could have occurred.
The "Leak is real" side has to argue:
-Why was the villagers name wrong, when WFT's was spot on?
-Why were LM, Pacman, and Miis not revealed e3 2013, as the leak stated?
-Why was Greninja not named/described/anything. Why did we get "Pokemon from X & Y" instead?
-How did the leaker update the Mii Fighters name correctly, but miss "Goddess Palutena"?
-Why was Rosalina not included in the leak (and revealed before the 3)?
The "Leak is fake" side has to argue:
-How could the leaker know about Villager, WFT, and Megaman at e3 2013?
-How has the leaker not been wrong about any guesses?
-How did the leaker correctly get the names of WFT and Mii Fighters?
-Do the Sneaky Spirits in Smash Run mean anything?
-If so, how did the leaker know about Chorus Men? (pending Chorus Men actually being in)
Did I miss anything?
this....isn't helpful. I and others still fall into the "fake" camp. I even gave a realistic scenario that could have given the same results a few pages back.Leak is real side only has to fight against nitpicking <_>
Leak is fake believers probably gave up.
Right now seems more like everyone's reached "this may as well be real, but wtf is going on behind all of it? and please give us more evidence that this not be all we're getting."
Nah, Mac and Me is just this terrible ET rip off.Not to split hairs, but the order was actually off. The initial rumor listed Pac-Man, Mii and Little Mac. Rosalina was unveiled before any of those three; and Greninja also broke the order, being unveiled between Mac and Mii.
Mac and Mii... Sounds like an awful live action Nickelodeon TV show.
1- Early copy of the roster documentThis is how I see it.. both sides of the argument have to explain how the holes in their side of the argument could have occurred.
The "Leak is real" side has to argue:
-Why was the villagers name wrong, when WFT's was spot on?
-Why were LM, Pacman, and Miis not revealed e3 2013, as the leak stated?
-Why was Greninja not named/described/anything. Why did we get "Pokemon from X & Y" instead?
-How did the leaker update the Mii Fighters name correctly, but miss "Goddess Palutena"?
-Why was Rosalina not included in the leak (and revealed before the 3)?
The "Leak is fake" side has to argue:
-How could the leaker know about Villager, WFT, and Megaman at e3 2013?
-How has the leaker not been wrong about any guesses?
-How did the leaker correctly get the names of WFT and Mii Fighters?
-Do the Sneaky Spirits in Smash Run mean anything?
-If so, how did the leaker know about Chorus Men? (pending Chorus Men actually being in)
Did I miss anything?
Explain why do you expect reveals after the game's releaseNintendo Direct once every 2 months
Direct in August, October, December
3 Directs, 3 Unrevealed newcomers (Chrom, Shulk, Chorus Men), 3 Trailers
Every single newcomer has a trailer in some form
3DS and Wii U versions will both be out before Feb Direct.
Any questions
Wii U I guess.Explain why do you expect reveals after the game's release
Doesn't make any sense, I could see they doing this with Mewtwo(making him a hidden 3DS char and after the release revealing him), but it's really farfetchedWii U I guess.
To keep the hype even though you know all of the characters ?
The leak is real camp doesn't have to argue anything because the leak is real.This is how I see it.. both sides of the argument have to explain how the holes in their side of the argument could have occurred.
The "Leak is real" side has to argue:
-Why was the villagers name wrong, when WFT's was spot on?
-Why were LM, Pacman, and Miis not revealed e3 2013, as the leak stated?
-Why was Greninja not named/described/anything. Why did we get "Pokemon from X & Y" instead?
-How did the leaker update the Mii Fighters name correctly, but miss "Goddess Palutena"?
-Why was Rosalina not included in the leak (and revealed before the 3)?
The "Leak is fake" side has to argue:
-How could the leaker know about Villager, WFT, and Megaman at e3 2013?
-How has the leaker not been wrong about any guesses?
-How did the leaker correctly get the names of WFT and Mii Fighters?
-Do the Sneaky Spirits in Smash Run mean anything?
-If so, how did the leaker know about Chorus Men? (pending Chorus Men actually being in)
Did I miss anything?
It's proving my point that those three characters are all that are left, anyone that's expecting anyone more or different is setting themselves up for disappointment. With the 3DS version out only during the December direct there is still a possibility of getting a trailer then, however I'm very positive there will not be anymore trailers for anymore directs there on. The number of directs are limited, and so are the newcomers.Explain why do you expect reveals after the game's release