You mean like marth?
Fair-dair-utilt
what other moves does he have, again? i forget, dolphin something occasionally?
What the heck are you smoking?
Marth pokes with fair, dtilt, and ftilt, generally depending on the character.
Beyond that he's about dancing blade and dolphin slash, his two supreme punishing moves (which give him an INCREDIBLE defensive game).
Utilt has nice utility and Dair is a reasonable gimper, but neither are even close to the cornerstone of Marth's game.
How do I show myself as a fool? I flamed him because he tried to state that I wouldn't with without metaknight.
What tournament did Ken win? Didn't he go to Evo and lose to a ROB who sidestepped over and over and then downsmashed?
OS is not good at brawl.
I repeat myself because I am in disbelief that people are really so scrubby as to want a character banned 6 months after a game comes out.
How bout this. I'll keep going to tournaments and keep winning. You random newbies (who really mean nothing to the tournament scene, I mean how many people in this thread actually go to tournaments anyway?) can keep on playing and keep on getting frustrated and losing. Rather than learning to beat it, you can just whine and cry until it's banned.
Then when you are still bad, you can whine and cry until there's something else to blame losing on. You know who doesn't whine about MK? The top players who place well across the country.
Frankly I'd love to see MK get banned, because it would be hilarious for all the newbies who think MK being banned will be a fresh start for them (just like they thought brawl would be a fresh start from melee) just continue to lose.
Look, I agree with you in that it's far too early to ban MK....
But your argument totally sucks.
You're throwing out constrant ad hominems, bringing up irrelevant factors like personal skill.
lNobody cares about the skill level of the players purposing banning, we only care about which characters are legitimately broken. We know which characters are legitimately broken by comparing character attributes and arriving on conclusions based on the metagame.
You might be the most skilled person in the world, but that doesn't mean anything in a debate, because it doesn't make you inherently right about any factor. THE EVIDENCE is all that matters, and as for individual arguments, how well they disseminate the evidence is what matters, including lack of logical errors.
Your argument was totally irrelevant to the discussion at hand, and we request that you confine your arguments to the matter at hand instead of taking cheap shots at the pro-ban crowd.
When they're wrong EXPLAIN IT PROPERLY, more expirience contributes to judgement on the issue, and you're more likely to be right because you know more. But expirience can be trumped by a lack of understanding or specific information.
Bottom line: if they're noobs, show they lack knowledge by explaining where they're wrong, just saying, "you're a noob" is a waste of text.