It's not my behavior, *******, I mentioned it in the same message that you're referring to.
So, you didn't just say
6-4 without CG
greater than that with the CG?
I can get it.
Enough with the facepalm BS, you're almost as bad as myself on mIRC circa 2001
I am sorry what? Don't compare me to yourself please.
Alright, maybe I was wrong, but any difference is barely noticeable in an actual brawl, and this little argument is irrelevant anyway based on your own statements about non-infinite play. Why are you still discussing it?
WOw am I really hearing this?
It does NOT matter.
if it can be done, its factored into the matchup. So the non infinite play BS, doesn't matter.
You make no sense here. A bigger shield is better even on a bigger character model because you can angle your shield.
NO.
A bigger shield is better ONLY if the shield to character model ratio makes the shield the greater.
DDD's shield is an incredible example.
Bowser's is another.
DK's is a poor shield because the shield size to character model ratio is skewed to the character model.
Simply put, DK is too big for the shield that was given to him, so he is more easily shieldpoked than other characters. Angling only does so much.
uh..Nobody was ever talking about Marth's amazing camping ability. You're talking about D3 forcing Wario to approach when Wario will be the one camping D3
This is why I sometimes hate SWF.
People are CLEARLY incapable of understanding the CONCEPT behind the EXAMPLE.
Reading comprehension is good.
You didn't respond to this point, you misunderstood it and I clarified. ****ing pay attention and stop turning this into a flame war.
...
...
Someone talk to him for me. Clearly I must be speaking in Freudian terms.
More internet troll politics. lol.
XD, when faced with the truth you call it trolling.
I understand all of it. The people who think it's a bad matchup for DK are the people who haven't seen it done right.
We don't care about the people who haven't done it right. We care about the capabilities of the character pure and simple. If they cannot understand that simple notion, why bother?
I am attacking the fact that your statements concerning matchup discussion are inane.
Yeah and if I had wheels I'd be a ****ing wagon.
If the shoe fits.
Seriously. It's not like Marth's bad matchups are due to abuses of the game physics like infinites which you can legitimately ban
WHO CARES!? A BAD MATCHUP IS A BAD MATCHUP. The end is what matter snot the means.
And you CANNOT legitimately ban infinites.
TO's that ban the infinite are allowing a major contradiction because there is NO criteria that is worthy for banning ANY of the infinites anyway!
As for the last part, I'm not responsible for babying you.
Translation: I am completely incapable of legitimately defending my point and shall now pretend as if I did by attempting to attack your credibility without any justification at all.
GG.
@SL84
Charizard has a longer grabrange than D3 does (if I read your post right...)
No they updated it recently gheb. They made a topic concerning the grab ranges and it as found that DDD's grab range is bigger than Charizards by roughly half a block. Its tactical i think in page 2?
@phi1ny3: Where is the error? I'll fix it.