zombie7775
Smash Lord
same here.I hate Final Fantasy I don't want anything from that game in Brawl.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
same here.I hate Final Fantasy I don't want anything from that game in Brawl.
Xien, for the LAST TIME. Pacman has done little to NOTHING for the console industry. It was a port so people could play it outside of the arcade. It was a major contributor to the game crash in 83'. Mariokart GP....IT'S ANOTHER ****ING ARCADE GAME!!!!! It doesn't help Nintendo at all. Quit making outlandish nonsensical claims.Pacman, Mario Kart GP, Capcom helped make the NES succsusful.
Of course because Pacman only started video games being popular. Arcades don't help Nintendo do they no that and handhelds are just the only place they are dominating. Almost all of Pacman's games have been on Nintendo systems, Pacman has appeared in a game with Mario, Miyamoto made a Pacman game, Namco is very close with Nintendo and has priority over Square Enix.Xien, for the LAST TIME. Pacman has done little to NOTHING for the console industry. It was a port so people could play it outside of the arcade. It was a major contributor to the game crash in 83'. Mariokart GP....IT'S ANOTHER ****ING ARCADE GAME!!!!! It doesn't help Nintendo at all. Quit making outlandish nonsensical claims.
It IS an opinion unless Square - Enix openely stated that Geno is more important to them than anyone from their FLAGSHIP franchise then it's an opinion. Final Fantsy is Square's best selling and most popular series so of course they would put in one of their characters from their they are a buisness, they are out to make money putting in Geno would NOT make them money because they do not use him at all.No, no one from FF is going to make it in. Geno has priority over ANY FF character, that's not an opinion. I don't need evidence for that, it's common sense. FF basically belongs to Sony anyway, with a little x-box on the side.
They are already making several FF games but they are just now starting to burry their feet into the Mario series again. I see Nintendo allowing them to make another Mario adventure game in the near future. They could revive Geno by putting him into Brawl and then make a game with him in it. A dream yeah, but it would be a very smart business move as well since Mario is the leading video game series and SMRPG is the most popular Mario RPG. A sequel, or hell even a remake would make a hefty amount of money. We are talking about several fans of the series, Mario fans, RPG fans, and new video gamers getting the good word on its easy and addictive gameplay who would buy it. Not to mention they would now have their foot firmly stuck into the most popular series.Square Enix gets the say in which on of THEIR characters get in and why would they lend one of their characters that makes them no money when they could lend one of their important characters, promote on of their upcoming games and make more money, Sega, Namco and Capcom have priority over Square Enix any way.
Sigh. I don't feel like argueing right now. Read this whole thread and then argue.That's not what he would do he knows that cloud is popular and would attract new customers
I thought the whole point was to think like a fan to get the money.I'm not suggesting cloud, I'm suggesting someone from FF to boost sales. When you stop thinking like a fan and start thinking of money Geno is unlikely
Smash fans are the only ones that want Geno in, Smash fans will get the game regardless because it is a Smash Bros game, the addition of 3rd parties is to attract new customers, Geno would not do that, FF characters would.I thought the whole point was to think like a fan to get the money.
If they didn't want to think of the fans, why did he open a poll where fans could submit characters and music to be put in the game? And besides, if they're thinking about money, they'll want to include the characters people want to see. And, according to the fan poll, who do they want to see? Geno.I'm not suggesting cloud, I'm suggesting someone from FF to boost sales. When you stop thinking like a fan and start thinking of money Geno is unlikely
Im going to second that senseless violence is awesome.Geno has guns to some degree. Guns are awesome, senseless violence is awesome, but guns used for senseless violence is the best of all.
That's the dumbest thing I've read since Peeze said that Diddy would be a clone of DK.Square Enix would only get one character, they know that, if they were asked for Geno they would proberly ask "can we add in _____ instead they have a new game coming out and we want to promote it" and then Nintendo would of course accept, Geno is not Square's number 1 priority
However, zombies and unwarranted explosions are more awesomeGeno has guns to some degree. Guns are awesome, senseless violence is awesome, but guns used for senseless violence is the best of all.
Then clearly you havn't been on Gamefaqs. Geno isn't Square's number 1 priority, FF is Square's number 1 series.That's the dumbest thing I've read since Peeze said that Diddy would be a clone of DK.
Namco= NO. What Namco character do you think has such a great priority?ok then, I'm just saying that I wouldn't be suprised if Geno wasn't in, I would think Sega, Namco and Capcom would have priority over them any way.
No, you're wrong. It was developed by Namco and distributed by Midway. Miyamoto had nothing to do with Pac-Man, the game was created by Toru Iwatani. He's appeard in ONE Nintendo licensed game and that's Mario Kart Arcade GP...the ARCADE installment. So what? He was in Ridge Racer first, and he was in friggin' Anna Kournikova's Smash Court Tennis too. So by association Anna is going to be in Brawl too right?Pacman, He has a suitable form, he's the first video game 'character', Miyamoto made a Pacman game, Pacman has appeared in a game with Mario and Namco is part of the arcade triforce.
Ok now lets post the truth......I said A pacman game not the game Pacman, no Namco is a close company to Nintendo, Square Enix is not as close as Namco.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pac-Man_Vs.
Pac Man Vs
Shigeru Miyamoto, creator of Mario, designed the game. The character of Mario (voiced by Charles Martinet) is also the game's announcer.
So he dseigned a game that was basically a demo? Woo. It was a freebie, and this has no relevance to your opinion on Namco being so tight with Nintendo. Anyway Geno has priority over FF characters, and Pac-Man is a terrible choice for brawl.Pac-Man Vs. is a Pac-Man video game exclusively for the Nintendo GameCube that was included as an extra bonus disc with the Player's Choice edition of Pac-Man World 2. It was also included in the GameCube versions of Namco's I-Ninja and R: Racing Evolution for a limited time, as well as a free giveaway at some stores.
The game itself takes advantage of the GameCube's connectivity with the Game Boy Advance (GBA), and cannot be played without the Game Boy Advance and the cable to hook it up to the GameCube. It is one of a few select GameCube games designed around the system link, including Final Fantasy: Crystal Chronicles and The Legend of Zelda: Four Swords Adventures.
And then beat him with a stick also take Cloud out too.This is the Geno topic, take Pac-Man outside.