Your Hero
Smash Champion
lol kk, sorry, all the pokemon in the pokeball, all the PCs, rayquaza isn't enough pokemon for you -_-, please just go buy pokemon for the wii and leave supersmash bros to represent all games, not just pokemon.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
He's bumping the thread and giving us something to talk about. That's plenty or reasons for him to stick around.Then why are you here..?
I have been saying that all along.If you keep fighting with the same Pokémon, or if you change them out too often, it’s not so good for the Pokémon.
If you want to be a good Pokémon Trainer, you’ll need to learn these kinds of ins and outs
Well let me correct myself, you're going to need to change if you want to be good with the pokemon trainer. Regardless of what exactly happends, it's going to affect the use of the pokemon.
Your still trying to push this?Your hero, consider the following numbers
Smash 64: 2 Pokemon out of 12 characters = 1/6 of the roster
Smash Melee: 4 Pokemon out of 26 characters = 1/6.5 of the roster
Do you consider these games to have "too many pokemon?"
So, if there is 42 characters in brawl, and they keep the same ratio of about 1/6, there's 7 Pokemon characters... with out being any more dominated than any previus game.
Why shouldn't he? It's a good point.Your still trying to push this?
Pay attention in math class. He is trying to make/ force a pattern out of 2 variables when it takes 3+ variables to make such a thing. Why not say Raichu should be in with Pika and Pichu because atleast half of the pokemon in smash have been Pika and a pika like in the past 2 game?Why shouldn't he? It's a good point.
No one was saying theres "too many" pokemon, just that theres "enuff" to rep the series effectively. Again I go to Mario. . . do you expect mario to keep getting more and more characters when the most reasonable Mario characters will max out around 6? Will we see random koopas in SSBB-SSB4?I'm saying "too many pokemon" is a simple ratio, pokemon representation over total characters.
IF Smash 64 and Smash melee did NOT qualify as too many pokemon, then we have a lower limit.
Therefore, by plugging in the expected (but not confirmed) character count, we can get a reasonable number of pokemon playable, without being "too many"
As you haven't been reading, I;ve stated that pokemon is represented everywhere in the game, not just in PC. and is has the most rep in that sense.He's bumping the thread and giving us something to talk about. That's plenty or reasons for him to stick around.
Your hero, consider the following numbers
Smash 64: 2 Pokemon out of 12 characters = 1/6 of the roster
Smash Melee: 4 Pokemon out of 26 characters = 1/6.5 of the roster
Do you consider these games to have "too many pokemon?"
So, if there is 42 characters in brawl, and they keep the same ratio of about 1/6, there's 7 Pokemon characters... with out being any more dominated than any previus game.
...OR 35...And just so you know, kaid's right on that 40 Characters thing. It is around about the average for how much Characters there will be generally. Well, according to the fans anyway. There could be 60 for all we know.
But think about characters that are "important" to the pokemon series. Most of them are not set in stone. I'd say that who's "important" in pokemon's case is dependent on the fans. And also, being useless is based on your own opinion, considering Lucario is probably the most popular new pokemon.These series get these numbers of characters because they need them to effectively show off the series. . . we have yet to get useless random characters from any of the top 3 series because they have all been important in their respective roles. Sounds more reasonable to add in characters that are important to a series, fill in main character roles and move on to others than to HAVE to make w/e amount of new characters for a series that doesn't need it.
Actually Fox takes his appearance from Command.Okay then... why do people think Pokémon should not get an up-to-date character? Why should they be stuck with the first and second generation? It's Diamond and Pearl that are making the money, are in the animé, and are in the spotlight right now!
All the Zelda characters are in their most current game, Twilight Princess; Fox looks like he's from Assault (the last Gamecube Star Fox game); Mario has FLUDD; Samus' costumes are fitting her latest games; Wario is in his WarioWare games; the Fire Emblem character comes from one of the more recent games (Path of Radiance); and Lucas was the most recent Earthbound/Mother character.
Pokémon has their old school representatives. Why are they not entitled to their new school too? They have 450+ characters, and are still very limited compared to this.
Which only proves his pointActually Fox takes his appearance from Command.
Bingo! (Except Gardevoirs are female only come fourth generation ).Why are people still calling Lucario random? He is by far the most popular possible new comer, is the only non legendary pokemon with a movie about him. Is fairly special in the games because he is an egg pokemon that is given to you. He has a unique typing both in the games and within smash. Plus he reps the fourth gen. Other than being popular Gardevoir had none of that. He was like 30 times more random then Lucario.
Agreed. But Video gamer is right. Gardevoirs can be any gender.Bingo! (Except Gardevoirs are female only come fourth generation ).
People also like Lucario because he is a Fighting Pokémon, perfect for Brawl. One thing that older fans of Pokémon want is to have more combat involved in Pokémon, something more intense than the games or animé provide. We want to see the real fighters actually fight, actually control them. And Lucario is one Pokémon we want to see do some brawling.
Yay! This is my point but expanded upon and better expressed. Pokemon has indeed moved on, and as such should have a playable rep from the latest gen because if there are none... Sakurai would be implying that only the first games were good... Ive repeated this a lot.Okay then... why do people think Pokémon should not get an up-to-date character? Why should they be stuck with the first and second generation? It's Diamond and Pearl that are making the money, are in the animé, and are in the spotlight right now!
All the Zelda characters are in their most current game, Twilight Princess; Fox looks like he's from Assault (the last Gamecube Star Fox game); Mario has FLUDD; Samus' costumes are fitting her latest games; Wario is in his WarioWare games; the Fire Emblem character comes from one of the more recent games (Path of Radiance); and Lucas was the most recent Earthbound/Mother character.
Pokémon has their old school representatives. Why are they not entitled to their new school too? They have 450+ characters, and are still very limited compared to this.
Lol/agreed.Lucario really does deserve a character spot in Brawl, but at least we will know if Sakurai likes 4th gen pokemon by the end of January when we find out the final roster from the Japanese players. Fighting Pokemon really need to be represented as playable, Im tired of pink puffballs(Jigglypuff) and yellow rats(pikachu).
Lucario's random just get over it. Lucario, the most popular possible newcomer? Riiiiiight...Why are people still calling Lucario random? He is by far the most popular possible new comer, is the only non legendary pokemon with a movie about him. Is fairly special in the games because he is an egg pokemon that is given to you. He has a unique typing both in the games and within smash. Plus he reps the fourth gen. Other than being popular Gardevoir had none of that. He was like 30 times more random then Lucario.