When I said this, my main objective was to bring to light to all of the other players the fact that Marshy is one who has proven, though only in the BRoom, to fake posting restrictions for his own personal gain. In Battlestar Gamafia (I honestly don't know if you read that game or not, EE), KevinM faked that he was only allowed to make a single post a day and breadcrumbed the phrase 1POST in his single posts. This literally cleared him of any and all suspicion from the town, and he outrightly admitted that he was hoping if the mafia had a recruiter that they would recruit him and he could ride his restriction to victory on either side.
I didn't read that game. That's actually very interesting. I have thought about faked post restrictions before, wondering what I could get out of them, but wasn't able to really justify calling attention to myself unnecessarily. However, I've only played ever played a vanilla, so I do acknowledge that the big picture changes with specialty roles and wild card tactics become plausible. But, despite not having firsthand experience dealing with posting restrictions, my argument wasn't that posting restrictions can't be a tactic. More on that in a second.
he fact that it fits the Lonely Island to have someone who has to post in a rapping or rhyming manner does not mean that his is automatically legitimate;
Oh, definitely not.
What I found unusual about your statement was that I felt you were calling him out far too bluntly far too early, thus my boiling things down as I did.
in fact, using the same valid logic that you used to explain how you think mafia would fake-claim, it would make it even more logical for him to fake something completely fitting and believable.
Absolutely. I don't want anybody to write Marshy off for this. I just feel calling it faking outright is absurd at this point, and that if your point was just "hey now look at this keep an eye on him", well, maybe you should have said that. Before somebody got the wrong idea and cast a third vote. A posting restriction is a nice and convenient way to attack someone, after all, since it's a faceless attack, and if/when the person ends up town, it's an equally convenient john.
I'm sure you can see my perspective on this, what with the glossy finish and the robot dancing and such. Now THAT'S an inside joke
Note that I don't think Marshy is scum for having or faking a posting restriction. I am making the possibility known to everyone else in case it didn't cross their mind, because not everyone is able to see Marshy's ridiculously smooth performance in BSGmafia.
Again, maybe you should have said that the first time around. But I'm not going to push that point any further -- "well it's D1" is the only reply I would expect, and it's reasonable enough. I guess.
I find it very interesting, and hopefully telling, that two of the three situations you bring to light as a result of an "AHHA I KNEW IT"
Just so we're clear, you know I meant in the sense that you would later get to say "Ah ha I knew it look how town I am", right?
moment involve either I'm traitor and Marshy is scum, or I'm scum and Marshy is traitor.
FYI the "or it could be nothing" encompasses a wide umbrella of things. The "nothing" part being any circumstance where you are town.
First of all, why are you betting on a traitor being in this game? Nothing that I know from The Lonely Island immediately rings 'traitor.'
The fish that get ***** - GAHH I'M SO BITTER MUST ABANDON THE LONELYTOWN
Please let me show you my - GAHH why won't people let me SHOW THEM MY *****????
That ****hole, Steve - GAHH I BETTER GET INVITED TO A PARTY SOON. EVEN A MAFIA PARTY.
The guy who didn't get to go on the boat - Flippin' copies is for chumps screw this
The JIMP Janitor at that supermarket - I do it too.... finally, a group that understands my pain! (this is in a hypothetical situation where the guys who **** in their pants are the mafia)
T-Pain - I'm the only legit cool black guy on a boat with a couple of wiggers.
I made a point about betting on a Traitor because... I am. I didn't specify, because most characters could somehow be contorted as traitor roles without a whole lot of seams, and so doing so will probably end up in a townie lynch if people put too much weight in it. Thus I assert a traitor, and not whom that might be.
The third situation is that it could be absolutely nothing, but that you are talking about it because it is "something."
Remember that wide umbrella I was talking about. I brought it up because it is of interest. "Absolutely nothing" encompasses any situation where you are town/town-alligned -- after all, my focal point of interest was you, and possible scumminess I was sensing. As such, you being allied with the town invalidates virtually any other possibility I could have mentioned.
Yes, it's "something". It's an interesting point you said in an interesting way. A way that is also quite different from what you apparently actually meant, D1-ness aside. I brought it up because it was worth discussing, not because it was hard evidence.
Of course it is something, because I brought it up. If I hadn't, I wouldn't be the center of attention, but I still thought it was something to bring to light.
Addressed earlier, for the most part. But, yes. I probably wouldn't have even cast a vote were it not for that point of yours.
Obviously I know that saying silly things brings attention to myself, but I trust that being the center of attention will not immediately translate into my getting lynched Day 1.
Hopefully not. Nobody wants another Batmafia D1
On the subject of silly, I am very glad that Mentosman, KevinM, and Numbers all got my jokes. In case you don't read the other threads in this forum, EE,
Not sure if this is meant to sound inflammatory, but we both know I don't have enough time to read threads that don't concern me and that I don't think will have spam / moderating-needed stuff in them. And, above all, you were responding to me -- not mentosman, KevinM, or Numbers
we had been talking about BabyJesus in a few of them, and the big red X and "UNHELPFUL" is, literally, exactly what he does.
Yes, I gather as much now. This doesn't change the fact that you ignored a stack of valid points by posting a macro, buying you a day. It's easy to see that as scum behavior. Remember my puzzle about Pythagorian Cleverness, and balancing the variables of brash and vaguely-unacceptable posting against the payoff of as much? You're clever too, Tom. And you know the game inside and out from plenty of practice. This whole thing could have easily been a brilliant exercise in scumhood.
I know I can do that kind of thing because a) its fun,
Joke discussion is over, MINI MIC. But, fine.
Sometimes D1 can break it's D1ness when people respond to points with points.
It is when it deflects valid points.
d) it creates moar discussion.
The only meaty discussion of which revolving around hey what do we make of this unusually frivolous silliness in Tom? Gah how confusing. I sure had my assumptions about him lined up through logic before he pulled that weird stunt! Now I don't know what to think! Jeez, why would a townie do that? Maybe it's a jester. But maybe it's scum. But maybe........
Mediocre didn't fake a generic character, he faked an extremely minor one. I take generic to mean normal, correct? Firebird is a minor character that he tried to claim, but he accidentally claimed Firestar who is straight up MARVEL and 0% Batman. I assumed that your character was a generic meaning absolutely normal character that the scum might try to claim, not a totally small character. So my mistake, I guess.
Alas, generic is a multi-purpose tool in our native tongue. In this case, I meant unnotably bland or minor. And yes, as I said, he got the name wrong.
Anyway, point recanted. It's easy enough to trip over an adjective's meaning.
I don't think I understand this, but I think you're talking about KevinM's bringing up Niiro's "I'm awesome" and my saying its not a problem?
To be honest, I think I have a typo in that statement (it's cryptic and redundant enough for that to be believable, I would think), and I can't remember what in the hell it would be.
That said, that's the altercation I was referring to. I'm not saying Niiro seeming to have a posting restriction is a big deal, either. But I'm with Kevin on that point in that a mafia goon can in fact breadcrumb a role just as easily as a townie can, and on that he's better than to just leap on Niiro for this reason without checking for a pro-townie role that might be of use and do what Niiro is doing.
In fact, why do you get to say that posting restriction doesn't sit well with you, but Kevin does not? True, Kevin's had a vote in it. But yours also calls attention to Marshy's post in such a blatant and blunt fashion that it ruins the restriction if it is in fact fake just as much for a townie as it does for scum. Kevin, on the other hand, simply pointed out, subtly and without exaggeration, that Niiro's posting style wasn't sitting right with him, and you then attacked him to this end.
I will give you that Kevin's post did somewhat prod Niiro in a direction of revealing himself, while your hit on Marshy's was more of a straight hit, but then again, why would you mind if you were going for mass roleclaim D1? A posting restriction could be flavor, after all, but you seem to pick and choose when it is an argument worth having. Just like you've picked and chosen when nameclaim is good and when it is bad.
Maybe I'm insecure, but I took this personally. Not the theatrics part, but the mediocre part I saw as complete provocation and name calling.
Well, I wasn't calling
you mediocre, but I felt your points on the KevinM-Niiro thing and especially the Marshy thing were weaksauce and, dare I say, unhelpful. Hence, mediocre insight. You're not mediocre. You're greater than or equal to the shizz, which is why I bothered to make such a statement.
The emergency was not that it was six days left, but that I was L-3 for no reason except that I bring things to discussion and I am silly.
Sorry, but no. My vote was a legitimate one, and the best one I felt I could make at the time. It's not my fault you said some silly things post-jokes and I took them as serious contribution that was flawed. It was the best lead I had at the time. It might still be.
And to reiterate, the BabyJesus joke has been making the rounds on these forums enough so that even Mentosman and 1048576 got it.
See above.
Macman is active on MS so he might have gotten it, and I know that KevinM got it. And its also just straight up amusing.
And distracting, and stalling, and a lot of other -ing conjugated verbs. I didn't get it, so what bag am I left holding? I made some points and I got a macro.
Do you still feel that I am your most comfortable lynch? Ask yourself why?
No, actually, I don't. I still don't like the looks of what you've put on the table, but there are other people on my radar. And just an FYI, the whole "oh EE you don't really suspect me you're so silly this is nothing" Jedi mind trick doesn't work on me. Not even when the person is innocent. I come to that conclusion myself, or I don't, but don't try to breadcrumb brevity into an actual altercation as though it will make me take the situation less seriously, nor anyone else. It is, among many other things, UNHELPFUL.
Unvote