Well of course. How else are you supposed to fight ditto matches with Ganondorf if there wasn't?Sakurai seems to believe there are multiple Ganon's.
In all honesty, that's not as farfetched as it seems.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Well of course. How else are you supposed to fight ditto matches with Ganondorf if there wasn't?Sakurai seems to believe there are multiple Ganon's.
It's a good idea (btw- his name is "Black Shadow" also there is another character that "fits the bill" who's name is "DeathBorn")I see your point, sir. Well made. There was actually a person that always said that they should include a certain character, I can't remember the name of the guy, but he's from F-Zero and uses shadow. What if we gave Ganon's move set to that guy, and gave Ganon a new moveset so that old Ganon players wouldn't be totally left in the dark? Of course, that's far fetched seeing as how Sakura doesn't want to do anything more with the game.
^This guy is a shill for Falcondorf in every way.Well of course. How else are you supposed to fight ditto matches with Ganondorf if there wasn't?
In all honesty, that's not as farfetched as it seems.
We have three timelines and a Ganondorf for every timeline + FS Ganondorf and HW Ganondorf. All five could turn into Ganon. I don't see how that's wrong.^This guy is a shill for Falcondorf in every way.
It's the same Ganon just in different timeline's. The only time another Ganon resurfaced was in one of the timeline splits where Ganon was resurrected. As in not Ganondorf Dragmire.We have three timelines and a Ganondorf for every timeline + FS Ganondorf and HW Ganondorf. All five could turn into Ganon. I don't see how that's wrong.
Then that proves my point: There are indeed multiple Ganondorfs (and Ganons by proxy). But it is as a consequence of what happened when the timelines split. Each Ganondorf went on from their point to meet different fates and either are or are not active at the moment.It's the same Ganon just in different timeline's. The only time another Ganon resurfaced was in one of the timeline splits where Ganon was resurrected. As in not Ganondorf Dragmire.
And most recent occurrences of Ganon happen to be post Oracles where Ganon was a mindless beast.
HW is in a separate timeline/dimension. As far as the official timeline goes everything in HW does not exist.
But as of Smash there is only one Ganon in the game on the roster.Then that proves my point: There are indeed multiple Ganondorfs (and Ganons by proxy). But it is as a consequence of what happened when the timelines split. Each Ganondorf went on from their point to meet different fates and either are or are not active at the moment.
(As well as FS Ganondorf and HW Ganondorf where only one of them is in a current established timeline while the other one is in an separate Zelda universe where things turned out different.)
Right. Like I always said, hey there's Toon Link, why not Toon Ganon that uses swords and has much more mobility and Ganon-esque moves?It's a good idea (btw- his name is "Black Shadow" also there is another character that "fits the bill" who's name is "DeathBorn")
But most would be upset over this character out right replacing smash Ganon.
A win-win situation (imho) will be to have Melee/OoT Ganondorf with an updated "Smash Ganon" move set. And have TP Ganondorf have a some similarities to the Smash/OoT Ganon but over all be completely unique.
For example;
-OoT Ganon will have a Flame Choke that launches the foe like Gerudo Dragon did in Melee. And TP Ganondorf has Brawl/Smash4 Flame Choke.
-OoT Ganondorf Dair stomp is quicker and strong while TP Ganon's Dair is slower but even stronger.
-OoT Ganon has the skull crusher Fair while TP Ganon has a similar move but it uses a sword and the move had more range who's being weaker and slightly slower.
But most things would be different like TP Ganon hovering, teleporting, B projectile, sword using etc.
I think you guys get the point lol...
This solution of 2 Ganondorfs will please everyone and than no one can really complain. "Smash Ganon" fans get to keep him the same (not considering any possible changes he might get) and Ganondorf fans get a unique and true to series character.
Win-Win!
If we have 2 Links, 2 Samus. And the likes of Marth and Lucina with only slight alterations between, I have a difficult time imagining this couldn't fly with 2 VERY different Ganondorfs on the roster both adding something unique to the game.
And Zelda would have had the usual "turn into Sheik and back" thing if the 3DS could have done it.But as of Smash there is only one Ganon in the game on the roster.
I agree.And Zelda would have had the usual "turn into Sheik and back" thing if the 3DS could have done it.
And there are two Samuses on the roster, even if we know that there's only one Samus in her Metroid (we do have Dark Samus, but she's already an Assist Trophy), so how many of a character there are on the roster is not that important.
I look at Samus as the SA-X from Metroid Fusion. And Samus as ZSS.And Zelda would have had the usual "turn into Sheik and back" thing if the 3DS could have done it.
And there are two Samuses on the roster, even if we know that there's only one Samus in her Metroid (we do have Dark Samus, but she's already an Assist Trophy), so how many of a character there are on the roster is not that important.
That a cool/interesting way of looking at it, I like it. But the point stands that it's the same Samus. Regardless of our "head-cannon".I look at Samus as the SA-X from Metroid Fusion. And Samus as ZSS.
Regardless on the whole transformations are separate thing, Giga Bowser and co notwithstanding, you have to admit that there are 2 Links, 2 Zelda's, and 1 Ganon in Smash.
Well personally. Samus never made computer noises when Samus got damaged. So that's probably Sakurai's "headcanon" at work.That a cool/interesting way of looking at it, I like it. But the point stands that it's the same Samus. Regardless of our "head-cannon".
Your 100% correct! Not trying to argue with you brother (sorry if it comes off that way, it's not the intention).Well personally. Samus never made computer noises when Samus got damaged. So that's probably Sakurai's "headcanon" at work.
The real reason for that (and probably a lot of other stuff) is that Smash as a whole is a silly series where characters fight each other and do silly stuff for no reason.Well personally. Samus never made computer noises when Samus got damaged. So that's probably Sakurai's "headcanon" at work.
I dunno 'bout that. Some other fighters are in the same boat (like, I really doubt Cpt. Falcon would fight as flashy as he does in Smash).It's funny how Ganondorf's moveset has to be justified with jumping through all these hoops like "it fits his personality" or "it represents his power" when no other character in the game has to and they can just go and fight like themselves.
Captain Falcon had no moveset to begin with, so it's not like there's anything to contradict. Ganon's different.I dunno 'bout that. Some other fighters are in the same boat (like, I really doubt Cpt. Falcon would fight as flashy as he does in Smash).
Why take the time to keep Megaman and Pacman to source material then? After all like you said Smash is a game where silly things happen for no reason.The real reason for that (and probably a lot of other stuff) is that Smash as a whole is a silly series where characters fight each other and do silly stuff for no reason.
Which I'd say is it's appeal.
You get all these things and more with Ganondorf in Hyrule Warriors.I'd love to see Ganondorf get a new moveset. Twin swords, dark magic, speed, bits and pieces of what he has now, and no mercy. Sounds like Ganondorf to me if you combine all the Zelda timelines.
Sakurai has never implied that there has been multiple Ganons as far as we can remember.Sakurai's whole "multiple Ganons" bit just proves how little he (and by extent his little Uprising waifus) knows about, as Viridi called it, Ganon Canon. Ganondorf has always been the same guy in each game, with only a single technicality with his Four Swords Adventure incarnation being a legit reincarnation, rather than the typical revival he get's. Whereas Sakurai largely implied that every single Ganon/Ganondorf are totally different people, and all of them certified F-Zero pilots apparently.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5A0957er_RoSakurai has never implied that there has been multiple Ganons as far as we can remember.
Again, Sakurai has never said that. That's a line of dialogue said by Viridi.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5A0957er_Ro
"One thing you should know, Pit, is that there are many different Ganons."
Learn to differentiate factual information in the Zelda canon as opposed to a juvenile Tsun Tsun loli Nature Goddess with a huge Magic Stick for a weapon who wants to wipe out humanity for petty reasons on par with most Greek Deities in mythical lore.Again, Sakurai has never said that. That's a line of dialogue said by Viridi.
She has also said that she wants to kill humans and such, or are you going to tell me that that implies that Sakurai wants to kill humanity? What a character says does not necessarily reflect what the author thinks.
Same for you. Learn the difference between what someone actually says rather that what one of their characters say.Learn to differentiate factual information in the Zelda canon as opposed to a juvenile Tsun Tsun loli Nature Goddess with a huge Magic Stick for a weapon who wants to wipe out humanity for petty reasons on par with most Greek Deities in mythical lore.
Implications of what is said implies there is more then one Ganondorf. Which isn't true. Therefore it is wrong.Same for you. Learn the difference between what someone actually says rather that what one of their characters say.
While there aren't that many, there are actually two of them at the very at least with FSA Dorf being a reincarnation. It could also be a reference to the split timeline where he, although the same entity, differs a lot from each other and walks differents paths through historyImplications of what is said implies there is more then one Ganondorf. Which isn't true. Therefore it is wrong.
The fact of the matter is that when Ganondorf becomes Ganon he isn't Ganondorf anymore. It's Ganondorf losing all his humanity and by extension becomes a new entity Ganon. While saying there are multiple Ganon's can technically be correct it's still wrong. Here's why. Because Viridi in this instance is referring to Ganondorf and as we know in all of Zelda at any point there was only ever one Ganondorf Dragmire.While there aren't that many, there are actually two of them at the very at least with FSA Dorf being a reincarnation. It could also be a reference to the split timeline where he, although the same entity, differs a lot from each other and walks differents paths through history
Sakurai clearly used her to deliver what I'm sure he thought was a fact about Ganondorf. Getting technical and trying to argue semantics will go nowhere. Viridi is wrong and Sakurai is wrong, and that's all there is to it. So much for knowing "Ganon Canon", is all I can say. lolAgain, Sakurai has never said that. That's a line of dialogue said by Viridi.
Being evil and giving "trivia" on a character from a different universe based entirely on the creator's false knowledge are 2 completely different things.She has also said that she wants to kill humans and such, or are you going to tell me that that implies that Sakurai wants to kill humanity?
2 is not "many".While there aren't that many, there are actually two of them at the very at least with FSA Dorf being a reincarnation.
Without Ganondorf, there is no Ganon. Just because the designers like to redesign his form every Zelda, doesn't mean it's a different creature. Ganondorf IS Ganon, it's simply a transformation that he can go into and go out of, thanks to the triforce of power. I don't know how that makes him a different being.The fact of the matter is that when Ganondorf becomes Ganon he isn't Ganondorf anymore. It's Ganondorf losing all his humanity and by extension becomes a new entity Ganon. While saying there are multiple Ganon's can technically be correct it's still wrong. Here's why. Because Viridi in this instance is referring to Ganondorf and as we know in all of Zelda at any point there was only ever one Ganondorf Dragmire.
Now if we look purely at Ganon the creature we can safely say there are multiple. Over the course of the series Ganon has taken on various different forms all based on a Demonic Boar.
But the thing is in this game we have Ganondorf not Ganon and the only Ganon form Ganondorf takes on is from TP. Therefore by Smash canon only one form of Ganon is present.
They're guest stars and characters not made by Nintendo or any of their subsidiaries. Even then, they may get changed in order to fit better, like how Pac-Man gets original moves to fill out his moveset or how Snake doesn't use weapons other than those that are or fire explosives, but keeps his CQC techniques. Mega Man by contrast to the others needed little changes in order to fit in, since he could already take most of his moves from the way his weapons worked.Why take the time to keep Megaman and Pacman to source material then? After all like you said Smash is a game where silly things happen for no reason.
We know him to be a bounty hunter in a futuristic setting. That's enough information to make a truer moveset than what he currently has. As it is, Captain Falcon's moveset was made up on the spot, or based on the only prototype sentai-like moveset from before Smash was Smash which is probably more likely: Captain Falcon fit the masculine build of the polygons programmed in at the time, and there were enough people who knew who and from where he came (though he wasn't that well-known, which is likely why he got in as a secret character). If anything, Cpt. Falcon would probably have more in common with Fox if they were to design a moveset for him from the scratch, than the sentai moveset he currently has.Captain Falcon had no moveset to begin with, so it's not like there's anything to contradict. Ganon's different.
This guy gets it.While there aren't that many, there are actually two of them at the very at least with FSA Dorf being a reincarnation. It could also be a reference to the split timeline where he, although the same entity, differs a lot from each other and walks differents paths through history
That's probably one of the other reasons for Sakurai picking Ganondorf to be the clone: A model to use for the GameCube already existed since that Ganondorf's Melee model also is (or is based) on the one on the 2000 Spaceworld demo. He probably included the sword in one of his victory poses as an easter egg and a based shout-out to the demo where he (presumably) got the model from. Ganondorf's design would latter be updated to Twilight Princess, and his moveset would be updated to include moves inspired by that particular incarnation's non-sword moves (while the Spaceworld Sword would then be swapped out for the Sage Sword).But there is the question. There are so many characters in the game do not have moveset to begin with. ANY characters from Star Fox (don't tell they have guns and reflectors), pokemon (arguably if consider the anime is the concept of the moveset), retro characters such Duck Hunt, Game and Watch, Rob (slam the gameplay mechanic from other franchises such that Mr. Game and Watch is essentially the conglomeration of all Game and Watch mini games), and finally Cap.Falcon.
All these characters got some excuses either they really lack of potential movesets or ideas. However, this makes Ganondorf an exception. At first, I was surprised that Ganondorf has his "sword" in his victory pose in melee years ago, as well as the same EXACT sword in Gamecube Zelda Techno trailer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvE3yJv3fm0. It is now a contradiction. First, Sakurai wants to keep the character as it is (cough, cough, Ridley. Remember?), yet, when is the last time Ganondorf wields a sword in OCARINA OF TIME!? It is at most the trident from Phantom Ganondorf from forest temple, or the giant golden dual blades wield by Ganon in the finale. Later, Ganondorf has the sword in Wind Waker, Twilight Princess, and possibly Skyward Sword Demise (the predecessor of Ganondorf, or consider Ganondorf is the incarnation of Demise's hatred).
In the bottom line, if Ganondorf has a unique yet far from root moveset could be understandable because melee has a short developing time. However, Ganondorf is still a clone or a semi-clone other prefer. It is also unacceptable that Ganondorf has wield such a massive blade in trophy and victory pose, and yet does not show up in the later game. Here is another analogy, I hope the supporters of both side can see it.
I want to eat an Angus burger in the commercial. The burger in commercial is half pound and with 5 toppings to pick from. When I arrive the store and order the burger, I got a .25 lb burger and only a ketchup in the burger. If the sword in melee is a commercial for the techno-demo, then why makes it so real in the first place, or could the trophy state the reason behind it? Ganondorf should be the way we have always wanted, Ganondorf can have unique moveset AND under the impression in Ocarina of Time, not a clone.
For last, please do not say Ganondorf's clone style fits him completely like "Oh, his Jump is so adrenaline pumping! Or his running amation is so imitation! Totally not something from Friday the Thirteen. If there are some supporters for the clone moveset, then opens a new thread for it. Or the thread discussion will be in a big loop over and over