ChaosKnight
Smash Master
shinku dosent play marth enough give him a break xD
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Wow. You're whining because Marth isn't good enough for you? Considering that he beats out 7/8 of the cast? And has a 4-6 matchup against Meta Knight?
LOL. im not whining. i do play marth, i just need something to really beat metaknight, so i also use snake and falco as SECONDARIESshinku dosent play marth enough give him a break xD
Agreed... I alreadyn brought it up I think and got a rather unsatisfactory andswer for the mind bogglingly low placement of Zelda, Olimar, Toon Link and Pikachu (lucas is too low too)I just went through a few pages, but this tier list is a joke topic, right? Because honestly I don't see how Toon Link and Pikachu are so low. So far I've just heard the TC say "Toon Link looks good on paper but he sucks." So far I've read he has no justification. >_> That, paired with a few other comments he made, make me think he's joking.
EDIT: I just read about up to page 10. I understand that like Gimpyfish, Chillin is a man of few words, but the problem is that while you can make statements and be correct with little explanation, for things like tier lists this just makes you look arrogant. I'm not saying your list is wrong, or that you're uninformed or anything, no, not at all. But I'm saying that when you make something like a tier list, at least please take the time to explain your decisions in depth. Some spots warrant a lot of questioning, like how I mentioned with Toon Link and Pikachu, but that's not all. I'm not saying this is a bad tier list, but I'm saying that it needs more explanation.
Didn't you hear about all the grab release garbage that he falls for? Without that he would be a pretty decent character....
WTF @ LUCAS in LOWTIER?!?!?!
could someone explain to me, it seems i have been completely mislead in brawl, and am a complete failure....
Well, if I sat here and responded to every single complaint that was posted about this tier list, it would probably take several years. That being said here's a general response to every single complaint in this thread.I just went through a few pages, but this tier list is a joke topic, right? Because honestly I don't see how Toon Link and Pikachu are so low. So far I've just heard the TC say "Toon Link looks good on paper but he sucks." So far I've read he has no justification. >_> That, paired with a few other comments he made, make me think he's joking.
EDIT: I just read about up to page 10. I understand that like Gimpyfish, Chillin is a man of few words, but the problem is that while you can make statements and be correct with little explanation, for things like tier lists this just makes you look arrogant. I'm not saying your list is wrong, or that you're uninformed or anything, no, not at all. But I'm saying that when you make something like a tier list, at least please take the time to explain your decisions in depth. Some spots warrant a lot of questioning, like how I mentioned with Toon Link and Pikachu, but that's not all. I'm not saying this is a bad tier list, but I'm saying that it needs more explanation.
Looks like someone's backpedaling and trying to regain some credibility. If you had stated the truth without any sarcasm to fluff it up, I don't think anyone would've gotten (as) angry about the list. Regardless, making lists like this is a waste of time. You could spend your time better by actually playing the game.Well, if I sat here and responded to every single complaint that was posted about this tier list, it would probably take several years. That being said here's a general response to every single complaint in this thread.
Honestly, and I think this is what a lot of people fail to realize about this tier list, it is opinion. Just like all tier lists that aren't directly based on tourney results. And my opinion is influenced by the people I play and the people I watch play. In my personal experience, I haven't seen anything from Toon Link or Pikachu to warrant them being higher, for example. Of course, for some of you, you might use those characters or know someone who uses them extremely well, and so you think "wow, this guy is full of ****". Obviously not everyone's opinion is going to align, so this many complaints are to be expected with a tier list. The fact is no matter WHAT I posted for a tier list, there would be tons of complaints. But I can justify saying this tier list is mostly accurate with the following: My opinion is based on playing with the best region in the country, MD/VA. I regularly play with Azen, Chu, Forte, NEO, G-reg, etc, and with these various players I get experience fighting nearly every single character, if not literally all of them, and it's always at a very high level. If Azen uses Link or Yoshi, it's not going to be a pushover. But at the same time, despite how difficult those characters of his may be, they don't do nearly as well as his G&W, Marth, Lucario, or Peach, for example.
Basically people should just realize that yes, this is opinion. The things in the first post like "the most accurate tier list in the history of man" were mostly a joke, although again because I play with the most skilled players and in the best region, it actually is pretty accurate as far as opinions go. And like I said originally, the tier list gets kinda fuzzy as it gets lower, so I will admit that I already can look back at it and see flaws with some of the lower tiers. But that's okay, because those characters suck anyway.
Woah calm down. I kinda understand where you are coming from, but Chillin's latest post is very reasonable and explains a lot of the thread. Regardless, the internet without fluff and sarcasm is a very boring place....Looks like someone's backpedaling and trying to regain some credibility. If you had stated the truth without any sarcasm to fluff it up, I don't think anyone would've gotten (as) angry about the list. Regardless, making lists like this is a waste of time. You could spend your time better by actually playing the game.
How do you know your region is the best? That's just narcissism and xenophobia setting in. Would you like a plug to go with the air pump used to inflate that ego of yours?
inb4"whoareu?"
Wow, sounds like you just wanted something to be angry about.Looks like someone's backpedaling and trying to regain some credibility. If you had stated the truth without any sarcasm to fluff it up, I don't think anyone would've gotten (as) angry about the list. Regardless, making lists like this is a waste of time. You could spend your time better by actually playing the game.
How do you know your region is the best? That's just narcissism and xenophobia setting in. Would you like a plug to go with the air pump used to inflate that ego of yours?
inb4"whoareu?"
So... yeah, off my nutsI mean... One tournament doesn't prove anything, but I wouldn't say we have "no idea" what the best region is... all signs point to MD/VA. DSF is probably the best player on the western half of the US, and he lost pretty handily to me and Azen. Cort and PC are the two best players from NY & up... they didn't do very well at CH3 (Cort got 9th, lost to M2K and DSF and PC got 6th, lost to Azen, me, and Forte for 5th place). 4 of the top 5 placers were MD/VA. Plank isn't even considered one of our top 5 players and he tied with DSF for 7th.
Then FAST happened, and Cort got 3rd, and Inui got 5th (compared to CH3 where Cort got 9th and Inui got 17th). There was FL representation (obviously), MW representation (NoJ got 7th) and Texas representation (Hylian got 9th). No offense but placing 7th or 9th at a tournament where Inui got 5th and Cort got 3rd isn't very impressive, especially when you look at Cort and Inui's CH3 placings. The only player other than M2K that can really claim to have a chance at besting MD/VA at this point is Reflex as far as I can tell, and something tells me he wouldn't take out me, Azen, Forte, Neo and Chu.
hrrm... any idiot probably knew that chillin wasn't ENTIRELY serious with the list. which is what makes it so awful because, though he's not completely serious, it's not really that bad so no one would pin it as a joke tier list anyway...Looks like someone's backpedaling and trying to regain some credibility. If you had stated the truth without any sarcasm to fluff it up, I don't think anyone would've gotten (as) angry about the list. Regardless, making lists like this is a waste of time. You could spend your time better by actually playing the game.
How do you know your region is the best? That's just narcissism and xenophobia setting in. Would you like a plug to go with the air pump used to inflate that ego of yours?
inb4"whoareu?"
More like, a year.just wait a few months... the back room will release one that half the boards will disagree with and the other half will completely base all their character mains on.
bah.. I've heard it'll be in a few months... maybe it SHOULDN'T be for a year... but you know the poor peons of the board are just itching for table scraps from the back room.More like, a year.
Fixpeople in this thread are bad at brawl
no one is allow to argue with the list until they have won at least two tournies or placed top 8 in five tournies with the character(s) that are where they are in the tier list.
Lol this is a very true statementpeople in this thread are bad at brawl
no one is allow to argue with the list until they have won at least two tournies or placed top 8 in five tournies
you should know that doesn't matter... you can be good without being a member of smashboards... though 99.9999% of the time, your assumption is correctWTF @ how many people are posting in this thread with accounts made in the past 3 months. Your opinion doesn't matter idiots
What the hell are you talking about?Erm, I hope this is a joke list?
I mean...apparently he wasn't completely serious when he made it, but it doesn't seem like he's completely joking either. That's the problem. If it's going to be a joke list, it should be bad enough so that we know it's a joke list.
If it's a joke list: Whatever, carry on, just know that there are many people who think this is accurate.
If it's a serious list: It's quite inaccurate. There are numerous flaws, and it seems to follow no factual, evidence based system at all, but merely personal experience.
Owie, now, opinions dont matter period, facts are better. >____0WTF @ how many people are posting in this thread with accounts made in the past 3 months. Your opinion doesn't matter idiots