CommanderZaktan
Smash Lord
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2014
- Messages
- 1,004
mark that date gravekeepers! Because august 8th is a direct! Better make those new tombstones and dig up those who are not playable in Smash 4.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I have this for now, I only made gravestones for the characters that had high chances or decent support, not all of them for obvious reasons.This place is probably getting an expansion August 8th... I hope I don't have to list any popular characters.
Also Chandeelure , can you make the new gaveyard image? You can wait until after the Direct, but I want the thread to have it, still using the Smash 4 one looks silly (Sorry if I sound bossy).
Great Job! But in the next one, can you add Meowth, Eevee, Proto Man, Midna, and Sukapon in the next one? I feel those were prominent enough to get a grave. (Sorry I sound so bossy).I have this for now, I only made gravestones for the characters that had high chances or decent support, not all of them for obvious reasons.
I will, don't worry!Great Job! But in the next one, can you add Meowth, Eevee, Proto Man, Midna, and Sukapon in the next one? I feel those were prominent enough to get a grave. (Sorry I sound so bossy).
Yes, that pictureAny pictures?
EDIT:
Considering Duck Hunt is pretty important on his own stage, is able to be interacted with, and is a character, I wouldn't necessarily throw out Captain Toad either. Pauline seems another story, though. Considering she's too important and hard to be replaced on a whim.Captian Toad is still possible. Only characters with a major role in a stage are disconfirmed. He's just a background (foreground?) element, so he's still in the running.
Pretty much. Otherwise Toon Link and Duck Hunt wouldn't be playable as well, since Smash 4. Plus, ZSS's Final Smash features regular Samus and she's still playableCaptian Toad is still possible. Only characters with a major role in a stage are disconfirmed. He's just a background (foreground?) element, so he's still in the running.
The dog was actually able to be interacted with as a platform. He's a "major role" by all means.Pretty much. Otherwise Toon Link and Duck Hunt wouldn't be playable as well, since Smash 4. Plus, ZSS's Final Smash features regular Samus and she's still playable
While sure this does raise some potential problems for Captain Toad, by no means it outright deconfirms him. imo what deconfirms a character is being a major stage hazard, Assist Trophy, or, if history tells us, being revealed as a trophy prior to release (but then it'd be still OK for DLC)
oh and RIP Mimikyu :/ the only part I didn't like of an otherwise flawless Direct. But I can live on without it
Samus is still Samus, whether she's wearing the suit or not. There is no more contradiction in Zero Suit Samus putting her Power Suit on than the existence of Samus dittos. Samus in a Varia Suit is not a different character from Samus in a Gravity Suit, there's only one Samus. And yet they are fighting each other on the same screen?! And Samus not wearing a suit (Zero Suit Samus, if you will) is fighting them as well?! This departs strongly from canon and the well-known fact that Samus is only one person! Straws, you are grasping at them.Pretty much. Otherwise Toon Link and Duck Hunt wouldn't be playable as well, since Smash 4. Plus, ZSS's Final Smash features regular Samus and she's still playable
Being revealed as a trophy should be less disconfirming than being part of a stage. Fighters get trophies! Multiple trophies, in fact. The issue with Rayman or whatever is that he received a whole update about his presence as a trophy, it was not an incidental reveal. If someone noticed it in a crowd of trophies, that would be a more similar situation. I would say the case would be even stronger against Captain Toad if Sakurai does an update about New Donk City Hall and specifically points out Captain Toad. But it's very strong already.While sure this does raise some potential problems for Captain Toad, by no means it outright deconfirms him. imo what deconfirms a character is being a major stage hazard, Assist Trophy, or, if history tells us, being revealed as a trophy prior to release (but then it'd be still OK for DLC)
One small thing to add on to what you said:Samus is still Samus, whether she's wearing the suit or not. There is no more contradiction in Zero Suit Samus putting her Power Suit on than the existence of Samus dittos. Samus in a Varia Suit is not a different character from Samus in a Gravity Suit, there's only one Samus. And yet they are fighting each other on the same screen?! And Samus not wearing a suit (Zero Suit Samus, if you will) is fighting them as well?! This departs strongly from canon and the well-known fact that Samus is only one person! Straws, you are grasping at them.
Toon Link was already a veteran, and on Spirit Train he wears the engineer's outfit (which is too bad, I always thought it would be a fun alt).
Duck Hunt and Donkey Kong are shown in 2-D, 8bit form, which is obviously quite distinct from their playable character models. I don't think the Duck Hunt stage was shown before Duck Hunt the fighter either.
By contrast the model on the New Donk City stage is exactly how you'd expect Captain Toad to look.
And, as I pointed out above, it's noteworthy that Pyrosphere was cut, most likely due to Ridley being playable. Because it sure isn't that Sakurai thinks stage bosses are no fun. While that's obviously a more prominent appearance than Captain Toad's (even if you can interact with him, it's hard to be more prominent than Ridley on Pyrosphere), it's noteworthy that they are somewhat avoiding these situations.
Being revealed as a trophy should be less disconfirming than being part of a stage. Fighters get trophies! Multiple trophies, in fact. The issue with Rayman or whatever is that he received a whole update about his presence as a trophy, it was not an incidental reveal. If someone noticed it in a crowd of trophies, that would be a more similar situation. I would say the case would be even stronger against Captain Toad if Sakurai does an update about New Donk City Hall and specifically points out Captain Toad. But it's very strong already.
I understand, I didn't want to believe the Ridley shadow disconfirmed him. But it ended up being the case. Lesser things than blatantly seeing the character fully rendered as a stage element in their standard appearance have strongly suggested a character not making it in. If you want to quibble that technically Sakurai could pull a crazy head fake on us and confirm Captain Toad anyway, I'd have to concede that, yes, he could. He could reveal that some AT or Pokemon revealed on the website was actually playable and he was j/k about them being an AT, or even that "they're the first character to be both an AT and a playable fighter!". But if that's your threshold, then nobody would be "disconfirmed" until release. And even then people can always argue that there could be secret shenanigans ("Maybe if you summon Ashley's AT 100 times, you unlock her! Sakurai never said that wasn't the case! And even if he did, he could be lying!"). The more reasonable thing is to conclude that Sakurai is extremely unlikely to pull that **** with any character, and even more unlikely to pull it in this specific case, and consider things like this a reasonable theshold to say that they're disconfirmed.
But I mean, they're your hopes to get up.
I'd counter that with Ganondorf's trophy in Melee but that is a bit of a shaky example.One small thing to add on to what you said:
Aside from ROB, we've never seen a newcomer make his first appearance as something besides a playable character before officially getting revealed.
According to the rules in this thread, Captian Toad is not disconfirmed. However, if Sakurai went through the trouble to make CT a foreground element in a stage, then I highly doubt he had any other plans for him. There's not much of a reason for him to tease or mislead us with someone like CT.
I love the graphic you have made!I have this for now, I only made gravestones for the characters that had high chances or decent support, not all of them for obvious reasons.
Thanks!I love the graphic you have made!
That said, I have a hard time thinking Bewear is the most popular outted Pokemon.
I would give that to Eevee, if Pokeball means they cannot get in.
We were also told some characters are now multiple purpose. Such as that Monster Hunter AT/ Boss.
I no longer see any of these things as flat out dismissal (though I understand that we have guidelines at the base of this thread).
Speaking of that list, I didn't see Isaac on it. Would he not be considered noticeably absent because he wasn't in Smash 4?PeridotGX The absences list needs to be trimmed down a bit now we've got confirmation on a few of them.
Namely, Dark Samus, Ashley and Chrom.
(And Gardevoir survived round two)
Yeah, it's only Smash 4 ones on that list.Speaking of that list, I didn't see Isaac on it. Would he not be considered noticeably absent because he wasn't in Smash 4?
I like the work being done. I do think Shovel Knight and Ashley should have a tombstone. Dampe from Ocarina of Time should be there overseeing it all. Just my personal opinion though.I have this for now, I only made gravestones for the characters that had high chances or decent support, not all of them for obvious reasons.
Sorry for this very small nitpick, but Captain Toad technically isn't disconfirmed, assuming he's just a background character that could just not appear if playable. I doubt he's in, but still.I made a version with Dampe and one without him.
PeridotGX , choose the one you prefer for the OP!
Also, the Monster Hunter thing is called Rathalos.
Thanks!Sorry for this very small nitpick, but Captain Toad technically isn't disconfirmed, assuming he's just a background character that could just not appear if playable. I doubt he's in, but still.
Still looks great though.
Best way to look at it. We don't have an example of a signature weapon debuting before there playable character. It's either been the same time(Ness is only a partial example, as his bat and the home-run bat use the same generic design in SSB64, but he doesn't have a proper signature weapon like, say Link. It's literally just a move. And the Home Run-Bat's most powerful move is a Smash attack... which only Ness' Bat is used as a Smash Attack. The only other point to note is that Ness was shown off with Bat in artwork. But let's remember that Ganondorf was shown off with his sword but never used it in Melee. It's a tech-demo sword, but the point stands that signature weapons are more or less a key focus of their moveset anyway, not a single move).I guess this isn't dispositive, but Lip's Stick is confirmed as a returning item (one of Richter's screenshots). You can always point to Screw Attack to say that she could still be in, but it certainly seems less likely.
Death's Scythe from Castlevania appears as an item but still not a good example, though he appears in the Simon Trailer. However other characters has used Death's Scythe outisde of Smash Bros.Best way to look at it. We don't have an example of a signature weapon debuting before there playable character. It's either been the same time(Ness is only a partial example, as his bat and the home-run bat use the same generic design in SSB64, but he doesn't have a proper signature weapon like, say Link. It's literally just a move. And the Home Run-Bat's most powerful move is a Smash attack... which only Ness' Bat is used as a Smash Attack. The only other point to note is that Ness was shown off with Bat in artwork. But let's remember that Ganondorf was shown off with his sword but never used it in Melee. It's a tech-demo sword, but the point stands that signature weapons are more or less a key focus of their moveset anyway, not a single move).
We have had an item debut that a character uses before the character(Pitfall for Villager), but in this case... it's not remotely a "signature item" for him. Literally the only one missing in Smash is the Fishing Rod at this point, and it simply wasn't used because there were other items that took priority(though it could've at least been a Tether Recovery when pressing R in the air, and if it doesn't hit anything, grabs a random fish, I guess?), but at that point, it's not being used to any real potential other than "just for the sake of it".
This is the problem with the Lip's Stick. We don't have a proper comparison at all. Yet. I agree it doesn't disconfirm her too. As it's not the same thing as her being an AT.
As for the Captain Toad thing, Cosmic is right. We didn't have a stage first appear with a character cameo before that character's game debut(well, in a direct, etc. I mean, yeah, King Dedede is in Dream Land, but it wasn't featured in Smash 4 either before his debut was shown, so...). While seeing them as a background piece does not outright say it's impossible, it does show that Sakurai seems to already have a core plan for the character. It's the same reason why the "AT's can be playable via DLC" isn't really something good to bank on. One reason is Brawl notes that they're characters who didn't make the playable cut and were given a specific role due to that. It may be a fan-rule, but it makes a lot of sense. Sakurai plans things ahead. When we see a role for a character that was never playable, it's likely their main role to begin with(though they can have other cameos, he hasn't really changed that they're still not playable in that game). Thus, it's often best to look at the idea that if they're on a stage already, they probably aren't getting in till a later game. Same with AT's/Pokeballs. Nothing wrong with having hope or hoping Sakurai does something new with his ideas, of course, just to keep your expectations in check.