Shogun_Fox
Smash Ace
lmao...it does kinda hurt...;________;
"=D" won't make the pain go away...
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
lmao...it does kinda hurt...;________;
"=D" won't make the pain go away...
;________;
"=D" won't make the pain go away...
lmao...it does kinda hurt...
Lol, you are SLAMMING men. What did we ever do to youTrue, it would be the extinction of the human race without men.
But honestly, that is still all they are good for.
^This proves your ignoranceLol, you are SLAMMING men. What did we ever do to you?
And aren't you suppose to be minding your own buisness? Asking what my gender is and on the internet, how rude of you!
In the grand scheme of things, no one really cares what gender you are the internet. You could be a dead chipmunk animated by a potatoe battery and people would probably still talk to you the same way.![]()
And yeah men have a tendency to "go easy" on women. Oh not to mention the derogatory statements and the random "hitting-on"![]()
It's funny because I'm usually the sandbagger in a match, lollz. Sandbagging is so fun... :3
![]()
Because MALES are the driving force behind irrelevant things like manners, fashion, and general superficiality in how they determine qualities or qualifications, right?True, it would be the extinction of the human race without men.
But honestly, that is still all they are good for.
Biased?As if.Okay, I'm ending this topic NOW. Sudsy, that is strongly biased and can be considered HIGHLY insulting. I'm considering removing you from the tournament right now.
it all makes perfect sense (Sarcasm) XD ^^Biased?As if.
Remove me? Lol. Dude, people think I'm a radical, messed up loon who has no social awareness or friends. Even the females are more likely to laugh at this because it's so obviously biased and wrong--and, afterall, it's me saying it. It must hold no validity.
Anyways, whatever. TigerWoods' opinion on men were just as strong as mine are on females.
And they aren't even insults. She has for whatever reason produced a set of principles to decide what is/ isn't desirable and it just so happens she honestly doesn't think men generally satisfy those principles often enough.
Some things are obvious--like the compromising and compensation on one gender's part for the other, because of the significant difference in priorities and where those selection of priorities have led them.
It is obvious how much one gender builds up the other in order to appear, say, not pig-like, not sexist, " understanding", "sensitive", kind or caring, just to get what they really desire from them. On the other hand, instead of actually demonstrating competance, the other gender claims biases and asserts things that cause naive things such as affirmitive action.
While this goes on, only FEW of that gender actually demonstrate their worth and succeed.
That gender also assume it is obvious the other is biased because they haven't had as many rewarding opportunities as the other has. If you knew of the enabling-type males thought patterns, you would see it is more likely they would give that gender MORE opportunities but less rewards, if they were biased, because they desire cost-efficiency.
If they knew a female was useful, they would be more likely to take advantage of you than to completely ignore you if they were biased.
But I'm ranting where ranting is unconditionally looked-over, so I'll stop now.
(I do want you to point out the areas in which you find males insufficient, Tiger. PM, please.)
Sorry. Been doing more reading than ranting lately.Oh god I forgot he still existed. =______=;
Biased?As if.
Remove me? Lol. Dude, people think I'm a radical, messed up loon who has no social awareness or friends. Even the females are more likely to laugh at this because it's so obviously biased and wrong--and, afterall, it's me saying it. It must hold no validity.
Anyways, whatever. TigerWoods' opinion on men were just as strong as mine are on females.
And they aren't even insults. She has for whatever reason produced a set of principles to decide what is/ isn't desirable and it just so happens she honestly doesn't think men generally satisfy those principles often enough.
Some things are obvious--like the compromising and compensation on one gender's part for the other, because of the significant difference in priorities and where those selection of priorities have led them.
It is obvious how much one gender builds up the other in order to appear, say, not pig-like, not sexist, " understanding", "sensitive", kind or caring, just to get what they really desire from them. On the other hand, instead of actually demonstrating competance, the other gender claims biases and asserts things that cause naive things such as affirmitive action.
While this goes on, only FEW of that gender actually demonstrate their worth and succeed.
That gender also assume it is obvious the other is biased because they haven't had as many rewarding opportunities as the other has. If you knew of the enabling-type males thought patterns, you would see it is more likely they would give that gender MORE opportunities but less rewards, if they were biased, because they desire cost-efficiency.
If they knew a female was useful, they would be more likely to take advantage of you than to completely ignore you if they were biased.
But I'm ranting where ranting is unconditionally looked-over, so I'll stop now.
(I do want you to point out the areas in which you find males insufficient, Tiger. PM, please.)
Oh manz...he had to be that guy to bring it there. But seriously..in a world full of censory this is what we need...people speaking their mind with no reprocusions...Sudsy you should be a debater >.>Because MALES are the driving force behind irrelevant things like manners, fashion, and general superficiality in how they determine qualities or qualifications, right?
Oh, and let me also guess--females are naturally capable of solving problems properly, because they understand the importance of logic and its function, right?
Because they're general understanding of logical principles would help man to progress technologically, right?
Males are environmentally stupid, but females tend to be useless past their ability to detect information.
The selfish brainwashing of children into thinking you'll be ok if you stay and do well in school, don't do drugs, stay away from the wrong people, and keep your head up--as if that realistically does anything for them beyond avoiding an utter trash heap life.
Oh, and the principle of satisfying social agendas among peers would also realistically help man progress in any way at all, right?
Your biases towards issues and relying strictly on your feelings keep people from being objective and capable of solving more than just the utmost basic trivial social issues.
Gosh. How did I miss this.
Just to counter your finishing statement, I'll say: females are good for little but cooking, detecting information about their environment, having sex with and...having sex with.
Anyways, this is me checking in for myself (obviously) and EliteM42. We're still paying attention.
Pro's only been asking for one. Not sure why...Yeah my cuz will play with me. Do I have to include his Fc too?
So that's how its going to be, huh? I'll fight fire with fire wood, but it'll be worth itI'm only trying to grill Glyph anyway, since he is of the "lower" gender.
Quote of the day.So that's how its going to be, huh? I'll fight fire with fire wood, but it'll be worth it![]()
One person hosts the room. If everyone just adds the one code, all will be well. OR, if your teammate doesn't have room or isn't willing to make room for the opponents, the former can add the host, lose, become host, and then it will be all set.If the both of you are using the same Wii, then just provide that console's FC. Otherwise, give both Wii's FC's.