Firstly, sex, heterosexual or homsexual, isn't always an act of love. Secondly, how is it different to drugs? You desire the homsoexual act, so you do it, just like an addict does the drug because he desires it.
Regardless, the point was to highlight the inconsistencies in people's reactions. If I were to criticise drug use, everyone is ok with it. But when I criticise the homsoexual act, in the exact same way, everyone loses their cool.
If he's talking in Church he's being disrespectful, and not complying with Church rules.
Secondly, that's someone entering an evironemnt, trying to change other people's views. I was asked to present mine, and never had the intent of converting anyone to my position.
I'm saying that with regards to the above scenario, the equivalent of how I went about my argument would be like the atheist guy not talking during the mass, and then being asked to defend his position, because remember, I only did it because I was asked to.
Again, I made a post relevant to the OP, and then I was asked to defend my position.
Again, I only did it because I was asked to provide my argument. And for the one hundreth time, I'm not criticisng the person, I'm criticising the act.
Being "annoying" because you were asked to by the people who were subsequently annoyed seems like a legitimate reason to me.