• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

The 2006-2008 Tier list

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lucky_Sharmz19

Smash Ace
Joined
Jun 18, 2006
Messages
900
Location
A lost ghost
Lucky, your points are extremely one sided and uninteresting to read. They also don't make any clear, concise sense as to what you're really trying to say since people who are much smarter than you have pretty much disproven every one of your "points".

Ganon is slow? Lol.

I haven't seen anyone disprove my points yet. Why not you try?
 

Naota-Kun

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
262
Location
Apopka, FL
Stripes would have gotten extra Rep for making my point if he wasn't banned. Guess it goes to the next agreeable one, Harbinger gets it. Anyways what do you think Mid Tier is afterall, Lucky? The bad tier? No. Mid means in the middle and in the middle that is where balance flows like the middle of alliance of good and evil is neutral so you have balanced thoughts. Balance meaning that all the redeeming qualities will be weighed equally by all the bad qualities of the character, thus making balance. Mario has lack of power and range in most of his moves but he makes it up in balance with mobility, a well wavedash, decent recovery, combo friendly movesets, and small stature. Ganondorf is an easy to edgeguard and combo character but his raw power, great priority, heavy weight, and good range makes up for that in balanced. If a single glearing weakness makes character suck I guess you'd have to say Falco sucks because of his aweful recovery. You are way too one sided -_-.
 

Naota-Kun

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
262
Location
Apopka, FL
Dr. Mario's is bad. You just have to use Mario's tools of recovery correctly like his Cape, Mario Tornado, Wall Jump, and his Super Jump Punch. Integrate those correctly and you got a decent recovery. Decent means 'okay', not good.
 

NJ'zFinest

Smash Ace
Joined
Apr 17, 2006
Messages
643
Dr. Mario's is bad. You just have to use Mario's tools of recovery correctly like his Cape, Mario Tornado, Wall Jump, and his Super Jump Punch. Integrate those correctly and you got a decent recovery. Decent means 'okay', not good.
Cape and Wall Jump are useless for Doc's Recovery. His Cape doesn't send him forward/up like Mario's and he can't even Wall Jump...

So, yea, it's simple Doc's Down B recovery that gives him a decent recovery.
 

Naota-Kun

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
262
Location
Apopka, FL
If you read I refer to Mario's recovery. I already said Dr. Mario's blows. See the problem here. People skim through posts to fast they hardly can tell the difference betwen Dr. mario and Mario's names.
 

Naota-Kun

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
262
Location
Apopka, FL
Alright, thanks for informing me. (resites) Doc. Alright, I'll keep it in my head. Anyways, the Doc has aweful recovery. Mario's is decent.
 

CaliburChamp

Smash Master
Joined
Oct 13, 2003
Messages
4,453
Location
Fort Lauderdale, FL
3DS FC
1392-6575-2504
I agree with everything else except for Kirby is definitly better than Bowser. He has fast, low laggable moves. I dont understand why the MBR, decided to take away that bottom tier list. That list defines the worst characters in the game. Mewtwo, Pichu, and Bowser. Those 3 characters never made it high enough in tournament rankings.
 

NJ'zFinest

Smash Ace
Joined
Apr 17, 2006
Messages
643
Alright, thanks for informing me. (resites) Doc. Alright, I'll keep it in my head. Anyways, the Doc has aweful recovery. Mario's is decent.
Mario has a good recovery.
Doc's recovery is FAR from awful (it's decent).
Awful recovery = Sheik or Ness
 

Naota-Kun

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
262
Location
Apopka, FL
I disagree. Bowser has more over Kirby. I think Bowser has more potential because at least Bowser has range, power, priority, and weight while Kirby has none of that and Kirby is pretty slow himself with his lack of mobility, especially in the air. Kirby even has trouble making a decent KO for it. He has to try hard and smart to KO while Bowser just has to tilt for KOs and he has the Whirling Fortress, which gives him very brief invinsibility on the ground, has good priority, good power when sweetspotted, and acts as an approach over rolling or dashing (even out of his shield). It can even score almost 30% damage when Whirling Fortress is used on an enemy in midair (you have to be, too) if they have bad DI. Bowser>Kirby.
 

Sighrax

Smash Lord
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
1,302
Location
Boca Raton
Sheik can go so far with her recovery, just the lag is terrible afterwards. Therefore I don't think it's THAT bad. Mario has an awesome recovery, it's very easy to mindgame someone to stop edgehogging with him. Doc gains no height, just slight horizontal distance when he does the Down+B.
 

CaliburChamp

Smash Master
Joined
Oct 13, 2003
Messages
4,453
Location
Fort Lauderdale, FL
3DS FC
1392-6575-2504
Top Tier:
Fox
Falco

High Tier:
Sheik
Marth
Peach

Middle Tier:
Captain Falcon
Ice Climbers
Samus
Doctor Mario
Jigglypuff
Mario
Ganondorf

Low Tier:
Link
Luigi
Donkey Kong
Roy
Young Link
Pikachu

Bottom Tier:
Yoshi
Zelda
Mr. Game and Watch
Ness
Kirby

Worst Tier:
Bowser
Mewtwo
Pichu
 

NJ'zFinest

Smash Ace
Joined
Apr 17, 2006
Messages
643

Sighrax

Smash Lord
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
1,302
Location
Boca Raton
There was a thread about someone doing it perfectly in AR, and you are at the same height before downb and after downb cools down and you can up b X_X
 

pwned142

Smash Cadet
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Messages
34
The ICs are waay to high... yes they have potential but thats not how they are supposed to be ranked.... Only one good Ic's that i know of chu dat. They should be much lower:ohwell:
 

Lucky_Sharmz19

Smash Ace
Joined
Jun 18, 2006
Messages
900
Location
A lost ghost
pwned said:
The ICs are waay to high... yes they have potential but thats not how they are supposed to be ranked.... Only one good Ic's that i know of chu dat. They should be much lower

*coughcoughDESYNCHcough STRONG SMASHEScoughSTRONG AERIALScoughINSANE GRAB COMBOScoughcoughPOPO CAN STILL FIGHT ON HIS OWNcoughcough*

sighrax said:
naw, my luigi recovery owns but doc doesnt actually gain height if you do it perfectly -_-
Luigi's recovery is good, but predictible and easy to edgeguard.

CaliburChamp said:
I agree with everything else except for Kirby is definitly better than Bowser. He has fast, low laggable moves. I dont understand why the MBR, decided to take away that bottom tier list. That list defines the worst characters in the game. Mewtwo, Pichu, and Bowser. Those 3 characters never made it high enough in tournament rankings.
Bowser's Up B+one of the best edgeguarders in the game+very fast and strong F air and B air= Instant Win against Kirby
 

Lucky_Sharmz19

Smash Ace
Joined
Jun 18, 2006
Messages
900
Location
A lost ghost
It's not terrible. His recovery moves give him a lot of horizontal movement. Especially his tornado because he loses almost no vertical distance, but gains a lot of horizontal distance. He also has is Up B, which goes directly up. Don't forget about how floaty he is.
 

Naota-Kun

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
262
Location
Apopka, FL
Not to mention it really hurts to use Luigi's recovery in Yoshi Story with Misfiring Green Missile. Luigi's like a ticking time bomb in combat.
 

highandmightyjoe

Smash Ace
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
822
Location
Alexandria, VA
People seem to throw around the "bad recovery" phrase pretty often. If you go to the character specific threads and read the guide for each character, all but about 5 of them refer to the character as having bad recovery. Really, there are 26 characters, so if a characters recovery is in the top 13 then it is good. I'm not saying Luigi's is or anything, maybe it is but I don't play him or against him often enough to know. It just annoys me to hear that so often. Such pessimism.
 

controlfreak7

Smash Ace
Joined
Nov 25, 2004
Messages
667
Location
Southern California
Top and "High" Tier= Broken

Mid Tier= Able to win 50% of the time

Low= Able to win 25% of the time

The rest doesn't matter.
Ok there is ****ing proof that lower tier characters are dependent on who plays them, this % of winning stuff is bull****.

The best freaking Kirby in the world would have a rough time against ken's kirby, the only possible reason that the best kirby would win is because they know how to ko/use kirby more than Ken does. That is pure 100% proof that low tier characters HAVE to be based on mindgames in order to be played nearly as well as top tier characters. The tier list is basically a scale ratio of tech skill to mindgames.

There is several ways this stuff works depending on who vs. who:

1. 2 foxes equal tech skill, the one with more mindgames will win
2. 2 kirbys, equal mindgames, the one with more techskill will win
3. low vs top (since I used kirby and fox I'll use them for this example), whoever is better with what their character is based on will win.

This is why people who play low tiers lose, not neccessarily because low tiers suck (you can call it a disadvantage that they don't have as much skills that can be utilized usefully), but rather because they are focused on how to use their character more than tricks (mindgames), which is what low tiers feed off of to replace lack of skills.

And not to bring my fox fanboy background into this, but I'm absolutely tired of people who have one-sided arguements about how fox is 'easy, cheap, broken.' He is way too ****ing overrated.

Until someone gets it through their head FOX IS THE MOST COMBOABLE/CHAINTHROWABLE CHARACTER IN THE GAME. On top of that he is one of the LIGHTEST CHARACTERS. its not that hard to **** fox if you just stop *****ing about it and do something. Reason I'm bringing this up, this is a discussion on tiers and I'm not attacking anyone specifically, but the crowd of anti-fox players (not that it makes my argument any less random.)

How do I know this? I play my cousins all the time, and believe me we're not nooby, we've got quite a few things down. One of my cousin's isn't much better than me, but he can **** my fox with ganon. He ****ing fairs me to death (do you know how bad fair ***** fox?). Yet he will complain when I do something such as shinespike him, regardless of percentage (and unless he does something such as down bs off stage or accidently jumps off stage its always a ko or nearly ko worthy percentage that he dies.)

On a list of my arguements to why shinespike isn't cheap, I'd like to add one thing. Shinespike isn't applicable in all situations. For example, if you are above the stage and recovering a shinespike won't do much to you (it would have to be repeated= oppurtunity to avoid it).

What is my point by all of this? fox=over-rated= if the tierlist was based on more than just tourney stats, fox should be lower.

And since I'm bringing this up why do a lot of people say fox is the hardest character to use. Keep in mind a lot of the people that say this don't main or play fox. Then there is a group that says fox is the easiest character, etc. My question is more directed toward the fact that why isn't there even anyone in between? Why is it either hardest or easiest?
 

Moose42687

Smash Rookie
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
17
I started playing as Luigi and it **** near changed my life :O. He's just that good! Faster than Fox and his arials get right to the point and then get out of the way so you can throw out 4-5 in the same jump sequence. His recovery is the best in the game in my opinion. get close to the edge with side b and stall/attack with rising down b and his arials. I think he should be higher and I reccomend everyone at least give him a decent try :p.

Edit: AND his taunt is an attack, meaning he has more attacks than every other char. So yea!
 

NJ'zFinest

Smash Ace
Joined
Apr 17, 2006
Messages
643
Doodah got banned? for what?
What I think: Since DooDah is know for arguing and correction the less inexperienced/nooby players in a "mean" matter, most of those people actually feel emotionally insulted and report it to a mod. Pretty sad :(
Mario is better than doc.
hmm, Mario has better recovery and slightly better at combing. Also his Fsmash my be a little weaker but it has more range. Then again, Doc is better at spamming and KOing. I think it evens out and depends on preference. The only reason why one character is higher than the other is mainly because Doc players have shown better results.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
nah, it's cause doc's edgeguarding is guaranteed since the supersheet hits way below the edge, and pills are gay.

that's about it.
 

NJ'zFinest

Smash Ace
Joined
Apr 17, 2006
Messages
643
oh yea, I forgot about Doc's sheet's gay hitbox.

****it Mow, you're almost at my old account's post count. You just need 20 more lol
 

mood4food77

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 6, 2005
Messages
5,964
doc also i hear has an advantage on jiggs while mario doesn't so that's probably another reason why he's higher up
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom