- Joined
- Mar 14, 2011
- Messages
- 5,493
You guys are really silly. =P
Were people always choosing Fox on Hyrule back in the day, and just running away?
Were people always choosing Fox on Hyrule back in the day, and just running away?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I've played on Hyrule in tournament lol.You guys are really silly. =P
Were people always choosing Fox on Hyrule back in the day, and just running away?
What tournament was this? When?No, it wasn't. It was at a tournament my girlfriend and I hosted so I know this for a fact. I played him first round in bracket(80 person tournament) and he went zelda and I Jv 3 stocked him. He then went falco game 2 and marth game 3 and beat me(2 stocked me in both I believe). I believe I was the only person he didn't play Zelda against.
I won't lose to Zelda as fox lol I really don't know how anyone can, the match-up is absurdly easy for fox. I beat his zelda solidly while at the time heavily playing brawl, I hadn't played melee for probably 6 months before the tournament.
It was at HD: Remix. I hosted the tournament with Rauleen lol we didn't play on stream. Kels won the tournament against deku in the finals.What tournament was this? When?
I seem to recall a tournament a while back that I couldn't attend but i checked out the stream. I remember Cosmo played against a fox player that laser camped him on PS and won, and i recall knowing their name from being an admin on the boards and not as a tournament name. I could have sworn it was you.
Pretty much.So...
You guys are saying that there isn't enough evidence for KJ64 to be banned, because it hasn't be over-centralizing. But if Hyrule wasn't ever really chosen, and thus there is really only theory as to why it should be banned...why is it banned? If that makes sense.
Are you not listening to me? I RAN THE TOURNAMENT. I RAN THE STREAM. I KNOW I WASN'T ON STREAM BECAUSE I WAS RUNNING IT.I thought it was HDR. I think you played on stream and didnt notice. That was the one where deku placed really high, right? And at the end the stream was just a camera shot of the crowd for a while and some people were trying to turn it to try to see a screen
Hyrule is overtly broken. It's undisputed that Fox hard-counters every other character in the game with an extremely derivative tactic. KJ64 comes nowhere close. This is why we want real evidence that KJ64 is broken, whereas we take it for granted with Hyrule.So...
You guys are saying that there isn't enough evidence for KJ64 to be banned, because it hasn't be over-centralizing. But if Hyrule wasn't ever really chosen, and thus there is really only theory as to why it should be banned...why is it banned? If that makes sense.
I think he figured it out sometime after that. I played him at SMYM this year and even though i was many times better than i had been before, he was flawless. His defense didn't have any holes and he would approach methodically and cut off options. Maybe I wasn't playing campy enough, but i remember trying quite hard and even though i would get him to mid percents last stock, he would always win.Yeah zelda can't do anything to fox :/ lol I don't know how he beats good foxes at all.
Nice johns. I'm not full of myself at all, I don't even care about how good I am at melee anymore and I never practice it because I'm a brawl player. You are johning about playing bad when I hadn't even played melee in probably almost 2 years seriously, I guarantee I was playing much worse than you lmao.if hylian was in my bracket at smym he would have gotten steamrolled. zelda is strong only when her defense is spot on. me getting hit by random upsmash at 80% cause i'm playing horribly is not indicative of anything. fox beats zelda pretty solidly but hylian is full of himself if he thinks that match was anything close to being the matchup at metagame level.
i had a recent set with Matt R. which I feel showed the matchup's true nature at high level. shame it was not recorded
I beat his zelda solidly while at the time heavily playing brawl, I hadn't played melee for probably 6 months before the tournament.
So do we like... average how horribly you guys were playing, and use that to figure out who would have won? Or is this one of those moments where someone comes in and says "no johns?"me getting hit by random upsmash at 80% cause i'm playing horribly is not indicative of anything.
Why is it undisputed if it hasn't been done enough to know for sure that it's broken? Or am I missing a point here? Are there simply some things that we should take for granted? Cause I'm not sure that I agree with that (obviously I'm not advocating for Hyrule to be unbanned, that's not what I'm getting at).Hyrule is overtly broken. It's undisputed that Fox hard-counters every other character in the game with an extremely derivative tactic. KJ64 comes nowhere close. This is why we want real evidence that KJ64 is broken, whereas we take it for granted with Hyrule.
If someone contested the Hyrule ban with reasonable theory suggesting that Fox is not broken there, then we would want evidence for the same reasons we want evidence for KJ64.
So you think Zelda is viable against fox?All I'm trying to say is that I've played against much campier, stronger opponents in much longer sets and what you saw in that single game was not a good representation of what zelda can do in the matchup.
as I soundly defeated you in the set I don't feel I have anything to prove in terms of pride or skill
Is Ganon viable against Fox? Same type of matchupSo you think Zelda is viable against fox?
It's undisputed because it's... obvious. Nobody with a decent grasp on competitive Melee is going to argue for the legality of Hyrule Temple. This is not the case for Kongo Jungle, so people want evidence.Why is it undisputed if it hasn't been done enough to know for sure that it's broken? Or am I missing a point here? Are there simply some things that we should take for granted? Cause I'm not sure that I agree with that (obviously I'm not advocating for Hyrule to be unbanned, that's not what I'm getting at).
Your definition of obvious is arbitrary and therefore you are arbitrarily demanding evidence for one but not the other.It's a double standard insofar as our definition of "obvious" happens to apply to Hyrule, but not Kongo Jungle 64. But it's not as though we're arbitrarily demanding evidence for one but not the other.