Team Rocket Mafia from the Disco Room: DGames Reject Copy

[DtJ Jungle]

rwar answering like that makes its hard to rebuttal, but alot of what our back and forth shows is that my interpretation of your words =/= your 'intent' (in quotes because you nor i have a way of proving it). When i said pushing for his lynch, it looked, to me, like you were saying 'i think frowns scummy for nitpicking." then you go, oh look theres frown again doing something scummy. It looked, to me, like you were nudging people to vote for him and lynch him, if that makes sense.

 

[Mattnumbers]

Ok, I'm going to start writing that post, sorry for the delay had irl stuff.

 

[Purple]

Less talk more rock.

 

[¯\_S.(ツ).L.I.D._/¯]

You don't get it, do you? Of course it requires a reason, but I see no reason to inform others of that reason.

But then you just look scummy because you haven't backed up your claim. If you're town, you shouldn't withhold information from the town.

 

[Purple]

But then you just look scummy because you haven't backed up your claim. If you're town, you shouldn't withhold information from the town.

TL;DR of all i wrote.

 

[DtJ Jungle]

But then you just look scummy because you haven't backed up your claim. If you're town, you shouldn't withhold information from the town.

I kiiiiiinda disagree to an extent. Yeah not giving reasons for stuff is bad, however sometimes for a case to work things need to be let out in a certain order or certain things need to fall. While it can be considered scummy, it's just something to note that there are instances where witholding information isn't really anti-town.

 

[¯\_S.(ツ).L.I.D._/¯]

I kiiiiiinda disagree to an extent. Yeah not giving reasons for stuff is bad, however sometimes for a case to work things need to be let out in a certain order or certain things need to fall. While it can be considered scummy, it's just something to note that there are instances where witholding information isn't really anti-town.

It certainly depends on the situation.

 

[Purple]

saying you want to lynch someone and you don't want to tell why. Is bleh to me.

 

[DtJ Jungle]

That's incredibly vague dude. Everything you do depends on the situation. How you word things, how you respond, and in what way all depend on the situation. How you extract information and how you lay down your hand depend on the situation. What's your point?

My point is this, don't feel the need to draw things out unless there's reason to. While I don't like his response either, his point is legit. He IS in a different timezone, and since alot of us post at night, it's hard for him to get to the meat of the discussion while we are all in it. On that note, Sir Nido only mentioned that Matt's logic is flawed. On that same note, I also don't like how he responded to Matt. Way way too defensive.

~~~

So yeah basically after all that and doing a quick readthrough on 034, I wanna hear too

 

[fragbait]

Holding out until tomorrow for a replacement. My vote stays though.

 

[Mattnumbers]

Ok, here is my DZLE post, sorry it took so long. Before anyone says anything, please take it for granted that everything in this game can be looked at from different angles. I'm not going to state it every time something could be looked at the opposite way, I'm just going to post the one that seems most likely to me based on evidence.

Well I played my first game as scum, and from that point of view, I learned not to trust anyone but your fellow scum. But as a townie, you must not trust anyone. Even the roleclaimers. If somebody roleclaims you can't trust them until something is proven. (See: Ndayday acting cop, then dying, proving cop. See: rPSI claiming odd cop, dying, and not being it.)

I think it'll be much better for me to be here from the start. As much as I caught up jumping in as a replacement, I couldnt see the times, feeling, and tenseness very well Because I didn't know the intense moments. I just read through them.

But now, i'm here, and ready to play!

Now i'll ask you a question in return:
In your experience, what is a common mistake scum makes, that makes them look really scummy, without them trying to make it so?

So this is the first relevant post that he made. Nothing TOO scummy, but wouldn't the answer from that last question sure be handy to know if you were scum, particularly scum played by a new person?

I could say the same thing but I wont. Laptop and 502 johns. But I drove to my friends today.

And i'll agree with everyone after Matt's post, that does seem like a very suspicious thing to say. Since that's basically what I did alot at the beginning of my time as scum last game, which I benefit from in the end. I'm not saying thats a "tell" that he's scum, it could just be a slip up.

i'll also FoS: Numbahs

I will refer back to this later, but for now let me point out how he simply agrees with everyone, and then posts that he thinks I could be scum because he was scum in the last game. But right after this he does what looks like backpedaling, before FoSing me (maybe as mafia he didn't want to be the first to vote). That isn't the main scumminess in this post however, but I'll refer back to it when it's relevant.

What's up everyone! I'm back and active. Good thing I ordered my laptop cord express. After much boredom and stress because my postal service is ********, my laptop is back in action.
Heres a small return-post:

And I'm just going to go ahead and Vote: Junglefever but only for right now I could easily change it, it just seems silly to only FoS when you are the first to vote on that person.

I tried this before and It doesnt really work. Saying that you vote but of course you can change it is just like going "I'm just gonna put this right here, but don't worry, I can take it back if you don't like it"
Around this time was when I decided to follow through on my FoS and Vote: Mattnumbers
So, apparently, me trying to do something he himself tried which didn't work for him is enough to jump on the newly formed bandwagon, assisting it get rolling? Not to mention that I did this directly after people (including him) started suspecting me for being neutral. First I'm suspicious for not being aggressive, then when I try a bit to be a bit more aggressive so I don't get lynched it makes me even more suspicious?

Alrighty...

As it's standing, while my initial suspicions of Frown are still there, more and more, it's seeming that someone is taking a very frontal, and offensive role. While last time I made this statement it led to Vanila, I'm quite confident in saying

UNVOTE
VOTE: JUNGLEFEVER

Why is being up front and offensive such a problem?

You may have answered it a little here and there, but let me ask you: (@Fragbait)
In detail, what in the world is wrong with being offensive? I'll go ahead and say Jungle has moved this game forward, shoveling coal into the flames so the train steadily chugs forward. Mafia needs this. Without things moving forward, we get nowhere. No info.
And don't think i'm protecting Jungle, I do have my own thoughts on him.

Immediately, when someone votes against the person who started (well, voted first but there was a gap between them and this got it started) the bandwagon he had hopped on, he defends him, states that he's a great contributor, and yet he then backpedals with vague claims, never mentioning them or suspecting Junglefever publicly again.

I wouldn't vote for Junglefever. He has been helping town quite a lot and it would be bad to lose our most experienced player.

Well, I don't vote for Jungle because I trust him the most at the moment. Then why SHOULD I vote for him?

You really think you should already be trusting people? Trust anyone D1 and admitting it is going to get you killed.

So, he says that you should never trust anyone, directing it at frowns trust in jungle, yet he doesn't show a single sign of suspicion in Jungle after the "other thoughts" claim.

I'd liek this answered from my voters.
Anyway, it's not like i'm pushing someone's lynch on nothing, or really even pushing a lynch. I'm pushign you guys to be PROactive instead of REactive. We're goign to lose this game if we just keep waiting around for **** to happen. I'm not giving out commands or telling you to do something other than to use your heads.

We shouldn't have enough to know exactly what to do? Of course I have no idea if I'm going to find scum or not when i raise suspicion, but does that mean we should just do nothing and be passive about everything? Even investigative roles need to be looked at twice because how do you know if someone's lying? The fact of the matter is that town needs to proactively look for scum and not rely on night actions and kills to do ti for you. Guys guess what, you can frame someone with the mafia kill! Connections can be made everywhere, even today. What if mafia uses one of those to their advantage?

tl;dr, you can't play passive and pussyfoot around and expect to win.

A couple smart posts imo, compared to most.


More Jungle praise, which helps keep the bandwagon moving

]We went over this. Someone else earlier said a FoS and Vote are essentially the same thing but it was disproved. Sure they are both used to prod for info, but a vote is a VOTE. IT KILLS. You can't pull the trigger with a FoS. If you FoS then have to irl for the day, it doesnt contribute. If you Vote and have to irl for the day, that vote is there. And will count towards the person when a lynch is or is not being decided. First part of you sounding desperate to lash out at those who have voted you.
Interesting that he didn't seem to remember the name of that person. The person who said you might as well Vote instead of FoS was, in fact, Junglefever himself, the person who started the bandwagon and was wholly supported by DZLE.


Because people have already said many of the same things i'm thinking. Aggressive, getting the ball rolling, suspicions, questions, etc.

How was my vote any different than others that were aimed to "get the ball rolling"?

No where in any of my posts have I admitted trust in ANYONE. Stop grasping at straws. Leave me out of your desperate cries.Theres no such thing as solid, inevitable proof and evidence til we see a body. Even if someone roleclaims and even has a point here or there to back it up, everything could be a lie. No proof til a body. That's why we have to use our wits and our intellect to found out what we believe is the best course of action. We can't sit around and "wait" as you posted at the beginning for "proof" because you won't find it til a lynch has or has not been made and the night is over.

But he never showed any suspicion either. As he himself said earlier,

You really think you should already be trusting people? Trust anyone D1 and admitting it is going to get you killed.

So why WOULD you admit trust?
The bolded comment contributes nothing and only serves to slander my image. The fact that he used such vibrant adjectives leads me to think that you meant it to do that as well.
And promoting rash decisions sounds pretty scummy to me as well.


Looking at playstyles from previous games and pointing out that a person could be using that same type of playstyle is pointless. They could just change their style in the blink of an eye. There is always another option that is possible as to why someone is acting the way they are than originally thought. ALWAYS another option.

Yet in his original FoS post he used that exact logic to justify his suspicions of me! What contradiction!

Additionally, this post didn't actually bring up any NEW things, he just expressed his disagreement with me and attempted to make me look bad, all the while dropping scum tells.

Exn incoming I guess?

Roxy, I had a small FoS on you throughout the beginning of this game. I almost even voted you once to see reactions.

But you have done well to redeem yourself in my eyes as pro-town, so my suspicion goes off you.

Matt gets scummier by the post, tbqh.

Seems like an attempt to get town buddies (or cover a fellow mafia). He didn't give any reasons WHY Roxy had redeemed himself. Then he makes another noncontributing comment stating vaguely that I "get scummier by the post".

Believe me if you want to or not, but I was going to vote for you back at my initial FoS on you, but then my laptop broke. I took a two day break while it was getting fixed and was only able to make a small post from a friends computer. I wasnt planning on jumping on a wagon. I had legit broken laptop johns.

But remember his earlier post?

I could say the same thing but I wont. Laptop and 502 johns. But I drove to my friends today.

And i'll agree with everyone after Matt's post, that does seem like a very suspicious thing to say. Since that's basically what I did alot at the beginning of my time as scum last game, which I benefit from in the end. I'm not saying thats a "tell" that he's scum, it could just be a slip up.

i'll also FoS: Numbahs

So he had already decided to Vote for me just because of a single slightly suspicious post that he himself didn't seem all that concerned about? And what happened to a Vote being so much worse than a FoS, he claims that the only reason he didn't actually vote was his laptop! The random comment on that one post I made serves as an anchor for him to base his claims of not bandwagoning, and you can tell he uses it so because he lies!

The only reason I have so much suspicion on you was because how flawed your posts were and because of how much you seriously seemed to want to stay alive. You really really don't want the lynch to happen on you and you are making that loud and clear, and that comes off as scummy to me. You are my number one FoS as it stands, yet as you've posted and as the day has progressed many other things have come into play, as it would seem.

The fact that I was striving to survive is recycled from someone else, and although he mentions flaws in my post he yet again does not elaborate whatsoever. But now that the bandwagon is settling down, he starts to try to cover himself.

Your vote on me really seems like a personal grudge you have on me. Something I did rub you the wrong way? There are many others, most likely mafia members voting for you, that's what is important. I ain't one of them.

Another appeal to the audience, attempting to villanize me.

You may be happy to hear that due to how the day has progressed and how you have put forth the effort to clear your name a bit, i'm going to
UNVOTE
...I need some time to think before I move further.

I'll be waiting.

And there you finish trying to fade away without attracting attention.

I'm really pressed on time right now guys, I'll have to make my post on other suspects tomorrow. I might also elaborate on this post later tonight.

 

[DZLE]

Vote: Mattnumbers

"Nothing TOO scummy, but wouldn't the answer from that last question sure be handy to know if you were scum, particularly scum played by a new person?"

The answer from that questions would be helpful to any and every player in this game.

"and then posts that he thinks I could be scum because he was scum in the last game."

That in no way is the sole reason why I thought you could be scum. It was just one of the reasons.

"First I'm suspicious for not being aggressive, then when I try a bit to be a bit more aggressive so I don't get lynched it makes me even more suspicious?"

You have to understand than almost anything you say or do in this game will get at least SOMEONE suspicious of you in some way.

About me "defending" Jungle:
The reasons you seem to HAVE to know why i'm suspicious of Jungle? I hate, absolutely hate, aggressiveness. He has been aggressive this whole game, and even though i've said and still agree that his aggressiveness isn't necesarily a bad thing for many of the reasons previously mentioned, I, personally, hate it. The way he was trying to gain so much information from almost every player was scummy to me. Thats why I was slightly suspicious of him.

The fact that he made many posts that I agreed with, and the fact that I disagreed when people said the playstyle was hurtful, in NO WAY means I'm buddying up with him! That's just you grasping again. You wan't people to shift their suspicion off you, onto me. That's pretty scummy. Either that, or since before you wanted so desperately to SURVIVE which you later brushed off as you "thinking the main goal of the game was for you to survive through your team winning, so you played accordingly", you could be indy. You realized you slipped up and people might start getting wise you to you being indy, so you brushed it off as you thinking the goal was different. I'm starting to take into affect that you could indeed by INDY.

About my whole Laptop john thing:
I said believe me or not. If you don't want to believe me then don't. I was just throwing it out there. No need to make a big deal out of something so small.

About recycled info:
Who cares? That just means someone posted something I was already thinking / something I in turn agreed with. You should know as well as anyone that happens. I'm not always sitting in front of my screen waiting for people to post in Mafia so I can reply what i'm thinking right then.

About me villianizing and slandering you:
Of course I would do these things. I want you dead. I need others to see how scummy your being.

Earlier I was saying I took my vote off you and kept it off til now because I didn't want to give mafia the chance to hammer unless I had more info. Well, I have my info, and I'm sure that you're the one that needs to get lynched.

 

[DtJ Jungle]

If I can count, thats L-2.

 

[Mattnumbers]

Vote: Mattnumbers

"Nothing TOO scummy, but wouldn't the answer from that last question sure be handy to know if you were scum, particularly scum played by a new person?"

The answer from that questions would be helpful to any and every player in this game.

Sure, but it would be the MOST helpful to someone playing a (full) game as scum for the very first time. And normal mafia would get the second most help since you are basically asking everyone to tell them exactly what NOT to do.

"and then posts that he thinks I could be scum because he was scum in the last game."

That in no way is the sole reason why I thought you could be scum. It was just one of the reasons.

..........which are? What had I done at that point besides remind you of the way you had played your first half-game as scum?

"First I'm suspicious for not being aggressive, then when I try a bit to be a bit more aggressive so I don't get lynched it makes me even more suspicious?"

You have to understand than almost anything you say or do in this game will get at least SOMEONE suspicious of you in some way.

Of course, the point is you contradicted yourself and said the exact opposite of what you thought earlier.

About me "defending" Jungle:
The reasons you seem to HAVE to know why i'm suspicious of Jungle? I hate, absolutely hate, aggressiveness. He has been aggressive this whole game, and even though i've said and still agree that his aggressiveness isn't necesarily a bad thing for many of the reasons previously mentioned, I, personally, hate it. The way he was trying to gain so much information from almost every player was scummy to me. Thats why I was slightly suspicious of him.

The fact that he made many posts that I agreed with, and the fact that I disagreed when people said the playstyle was hurtful, in NO WAY means I'm buddying up with him! That's just you grasping again. You wan't people to shift their suspicion off you, onto me. That's pretty scummy. Either that, or since before you wanted so desperately to SURVIVE which you later brushed off as you "thinking the main goal of the game was for you to survive through your team winning, so you played accordingly", you could be indy. You realized you slipped up and people might start getting wise you to you being indy, so you brushed it off as you thinking the goal was different. I'm starting to take into affect that you could indeed by INDY.

Wait........so you hate aggressiveness but think its good for town, but you ignore the second part and suspect aggressive people anyways? And post on how being neutral is a scum tell?

Since that's basically what I did alot at the beginning of my time as scum last game, which I benefit from in the end. I'm not saying thats a "tell" that he's scum, it could just be a slip up.

Also, you didn't include anything but fluff in those two paragraphs. Saying you're suspicious of someone because you "hate their playstyle" means nothing and could have easily been fabricated, especially when this is the first sign you have shown of disliking it the entire game!

And what would an indie roll even BE in a Team Rocket themed mafia? And why would I have so blatantly talked about how I should "play to survive". Besides, even if I AM indie (which I am not), that doesn't matter until endgame, for now I would just be another person to take a NK instead of a town PR.

About my whole Laptop john thing:
I said believe me or not. If you don't want to believe me then don't. I was just throwing it out there. No need to make a big deal out of something so small.

Wait, so you're telling me that I SHOULDN'T believe you? If I do believe you, then I find it very scummy that you would have voted so easily, especially right before you call me scum for changing MY FoS to a Vote.

About recycled info:
Who cares? That just means someone posted something I was already thinking / something I in turn agreed with. You should know as well as anyone that happens. I'm not always sitting in front of my screen waiting for people to post in Mafia so I can reply what i'm thinking right then.

See: the current discussion people are having with Rei (Roxy hit it right on the spot by the way)

About me villianizing and slandering you:
Of course I would do these things. I want you dead. I need others to see how scummy your being.

Then how about bringing up evidence, or actually contributing in some way. If all you have to say is slander then you must not have a very good reason for thinking I'm scummy (IE you know I'm not because YOU ARE)

Earlier I was saying I took my vote off you and kept it off til now because I didn't want to give mafia the chance to hammer unless I had more info. Well, I have my info, and I'm sure that you're the one that needs to get lynched.

What info? I barely posted between your unvote post and my previous one, and my previous one was purely refutation. YOU are the one panicking because if I don't get lynched soon we'll run out of time and you will have to either deal with further pressure tomorrow or NK me.

 

[Mattnumbers]

Also yes, I think I'm two away from a lynch not one.

 

[DtJ Jungle]

Couple things

1) i can think of a few indy roles. But something you need to remember about Themed games is that everything doesn't always have to follow canon of the original story.

2) Indy is something you worry about all game actually and should be looking for. Mafia should come first but say we have an Independent survivor (someone who wins with whoever is the majority) then that gives mafia another vote/person in their numbers in a sense. Indy is something you should be very wary of and not just worry about in endgame.

3) You keep bringing up evidence, and i have told you time and time again, that hard evidence is nigh on impossible sans the death of a claimed PR (including claiming all their actions). Actually, other than that situation, it is impossible. There is no such thing as hard, conclusive evidence in this game. I've explianed this several times.

I'll delve into DZLE's in a bit

 

[Mattnumbers]

Oh, well I've never been in a game with an indy to my knowledge, so I didn't know.

@#3: And I have repeated time and time again that I know there is very little conclusive evidence. You are misinterpreting me, I'm not saying that we NEED hard evidence, I'm saying that because of the LACK of hard evidence we have to use weaker evidence even if it's not completely sound.

 

[DtJ Jungle]

Vote: Mattnumbers

"Nothing TOO scummy, but wouldn't the answer from that last question sure be handy to know if you were scum, particularly scum played by a new person?"

The answer from that questions would be helpful to any and every player in this game.

"and then posts that he thinks I could be scum because he was scum in the last game."

That in no way is the sole reason why I thought you could be scum. It was just one of the reasons.

"First I'm suspicious for not being aggressive, then when I try a bit to be a bit more aggressive so I don't get lynched it makes me even more suspicious?"

You have to understand than almost anything you say or do in this game will get at least SOMEONE suspicious of you in some way.

Uh i don't really understand where this is from.

About me "defending" Jungle:
The reasons you seem to HAVE to know why i'm suspicious of Jungle? I hate, absolutely hate, aggressiveness. He has been aggressive this whole game, and even though i've said and still agree that his aggressiveness isn't necesarily a bad thing for many of the reasons previously mentioned, I, personally, hate it. The way he was trying to gain so much information from almost every player was scummy to me. Thats why I was slightly suspicious of him.

I don't understand why you hate something you find useful. ALso, please look at what i did to acquire information or what questions i asked. I chose my questions very carefully sot hat they would benefit town not scum. I never asked who town trusted, asked for roles, and things of that nature. I asked people about their thoughts on game mechanics (lynch and no lynch) and suspicions. People need to know where others stand in terms of scumminess. IF we don't know then nothing moves forward. HOWEVER, who we trust is a totally different story. Who we think is scum and who we trust is totally differnet. Just because we don't mention someone in a post of scumminess doesn't mean that persn thinks they are autocleared or trusted. Just, in a general sense of who is the scummiest, they aren't up there, yet. This is of course assuming that all the cards are laid out on the table by said person.

The fact that he made many posts that I agreed with, and the fact that I disagreed when people said the playstyle was hurtful, in NO WAY means I'm buddying up with him! That's just you grasping again. You wan't people to shift their suspicion off you, onto me. That's pretty scummy. Either that, or since before you wanted so desperately to SURVIVE which you later brushed off as you "thinking the main goal of the game was for you to survive through your team winning, so you played accordingly", you could be indy. You realized you slipped up and people might start getting wise you to you being indy, so you brushed it off as you thinking the goal was different. I'm starting to take into affect that you could indeed by INDY.

It's not like Matt is throwing around "NO YOU's!" around. Whether you want it to or not, your creating a connection to me by stating that you even simply agree with me. Is it scummy? No, but it is creating a connection, and can be viewed as buddying if a theory and circumstantial stuff presents itself.

About my whole Laptop john thing:
I said believe me or not. If you don't want to believe me then don't. I was just throwing it out there. No need to make a big deal out of something so small.

johns

About recycled info:
Who cares? That just means someone posted something I was already thinking / something I in turn agreed with. You should know as well as anyone that happens. I'm not always sitting in front of my screen waiting for people to post in Mafia so I can reply what i'm thinking right then.

It does happen that people will agree on things, however there is always more light to be shed and ways to add onto suspicion or add on to what's allready been said. Recycling and parroting and not bringing anything new up can be viewed as a way of feigning activity and usefulness.

About me villianizing and slandering you:
Of course I would do these things. I want you dead. I need others to see how scummy your being.

No you do not villianize and slander. Villianizing and slandering is throwing the guilt onto someone else and lying about something, which you dont do as town.

Earlier I was saying I took my vote off you and kept it off til now because I didn't want to give mafia the chance to hammer unless I had more info. Well, I have my info, and I'm sure that you're the one that needs to get lynched.

allright

 

[rPSIvysaur]

Vote Count:
-Rei-: ()
Fragbait: ()
DZLE: Mattnumbers (

)
Mattnumbers: Ohaiduhg, Elder Sister, :034 , Vrael, DZLE(

)
Ndayday: Junglefever(

)
Ohaiduhg: ()
Roxy: ()
Elder Sister: ()
Lythium: ()
Vrael: ()
:034 :: ()
Frown: ()
Junglefever: Fragbait (

)
Not Voting: -Rei-, Ndayday, Frown, Lythium, Roxy(

)

 

[¯\_S.(ツ).L.I.D._/¯]

That's incredibly vague dude. Everything you do depends on the situation. How you word things, how you respond, and in what way all depend on the situation. How you extract information and how you lay down your hand depend on the situation. What's your point?

I was agreeing with you...

 

[ndayday]

This is how I feel right now.

I don't think Matt is scum. However, I feel as though we would accomplish less with a no lynch...and we're going to get that if we don't

a) lynch Matt
b) come up with someone else to lynch and get everyone to put a vote on them

With that said, I think it is in town's best interest to lynch Matt, regardless if he is town or not.

vote: Mattnumbers

I wanted to vote Jungle, but I think that would be dangerous at this point. Tomorrow though, I 'm going to be watching him like crazy. His big post on me has made me very suspicious of him.

 

[Purple]

****. we're on matt hard.

 

[Purple]

vote: mattnumbers

lookit me I'm scummy for hammering on matt.

Honestly i just want to see your flip, and i feel while you're understanding the game more, you'll cause confusion end-game.

If you're anything other than vanilla i'll kill you in another thread.

 

[Frown]

I don't think Matt is scum.
vote: Mattnumbers

vote: mattnumbers

O_O

This is either some sort of "oh hi im scum" claim or just very unorthodox play. Sure, he gets killed but... if he is a townie, that's one Day less that we might be able to stay in the game! While we are going to get a lot of info through this, I don't think it's a good idea to sacrifice someone you don't even suspect.

We'll have to see. If he is scum, we are going to be in a really good position.

 

[Lythium]

I guess we'll have to wait and see then.

 

[Purple]

it is pretty unorthodox. It'll bite me in the *** later I'm sure. However he's claiming vanilla townie. So this should be fine from both POV's

 

[Mattnumbers]

~sigh~ I probably would have got NKed anyways just for trying too hard to survive.

/Vanilla Townie

 

[Frown]

You didn't die in vain. Rest in peace.

 

[Purple]

I got this mafia in my sight >:x

 

[Purple]

mattnumbers, is rocketpsience allows, i recommend you continue reading the next few days, and get who's mafia and who's not from rocketpsience. Just so you can see how people act and react to things. It's not the best experience, but it helps.

Also join a newbie mafia in DGames since you're free.

 

[Elder Sister]

lol @Roxy hammering

i can see where you come from though.

i was JUST going to type a huge post on a couple of things that i'd like to comment on, guess i can't do that now. Maybe later.

I feel a little uneasy that so many people jumped on matt after i voted him (in fact, 5 people).
regardless of their suspicions from before, since they UNVOTED, i feel like i might've created an opportunity for mafia to jump on an easy townie-lynch (IF MATT IS GONNA TURN OUT BEING TOWN).
if that makes sense.


however, my vote is where i want it to be.

 

[Elder Sister]

i don't think you were too scummy, you just acted anti-town you know...


i'm really sorry you died this fast, as you also only got to play 1 day in TFM

/fluff

 

[Purple]

Elder Sister was pretty dead on about it. You acted anti-town early, and that can't go ignored.

I'm voting to see if my suspicions are right.

 

[rPSIvysaur]

I'm not at home so I can't post the flavor. However, no one may change their vote now.

 

[Purple]

when will you post it? :/

 

[Frown]

In all mafia games I've seen, the votes are decided whenever there's a majority and not when the host makes a post about it.

 

[:034:]

Uhm

just as planned??

Let's wait for the flip!

 

[rPSIvysaur]

Mattnumbers is dead now Frown, I'm just at school.

 

[Frown]

I know. But as far as I know, the lynch happens immediately after a majority.

 

[rPSIvysaur]

The problem is, is that I'm at school and I don't have access to my files with everything about mafia in it. That's why the deadline was moved to 3.

But I'll do a makeshift one now.