Sieguest
Smash Master
...
If they're all retired anyway, does it really matter how they rank?
If they're all retired anyway, does it really matter how they rank?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Actually. yes it does. To determine The Deadliest Brawler, we should have an accurate list of where each person places. This is part of it....
If they're all retired anyway, does it really matter how they rank?
Well then I'll say this, when one is classified as "retired" then technically they are taken out of the competition, and if they're out of the competition, then they aren't subject to anything related to that competition. Not even ranks... a good example are races. racers that have to retire from the cup series aren't placed.Actually. yes it does. To determine The Deadliest Brawler, we should have an accurate list of where each person places. This is part of it.
So then we have different ranks is what you're saying?Well then I'll say this, when one is classified as "retired" then technically they are taken out of the competition, and if they're out of the competition, then they aren't subject to anything related to that competition. Not even ranks... a good example are races. racers that have to retire from the cup series aren't placed.
Rly o Rly?we'll rank them.
retiring simply means that there isnt really anyone left fot them to fight fairly. They have proven themselves to such *that* badly
well yeah.Rly o Rly?
No, not different ranks of retirees, retired is just what it means, completely out of the competition, retirees aren't ranked, You'll notice that in immediate ranking charts when an athlete or such is forced to retire, they have something that indicates that the athlete is retired. Then in standings showings after that, that athlete might not show up on the list or that athlete may be at the bottom of a list being listed as retired and nothing more. Although some events may still show an athletes record for the competition, but they won't have a rank assigned to them.So then we have different ranks is what you're saying?
Like 1st set of retirees, then 2nd set, and so on?
Cuz if you mean that we just eliminate them in general and never bring them up then what happens when we determine TDB and JOE! does other MUs? If we do a list we have a way to classify where each person stands. And it's better if we do it this way so we won't have TDB Tier List controversy; rather argue over 8 people now than the whole list later.
Retiring in the competitive sense is being deemed unfit to participate in the competition any longer and must be withdrawn from it. Retirees forfeit all rankings or positions on standings charts upon being forced to retire. Also see above.JOE! said:retiring simply means that there isnt really anyone left fot them to fight fairly. They have proven themselves to such *that* badly
No, not different ranks of retirees, retired is just what it means, completely out of the competition, retirees aren't ranked, You'll notice that in immediate ranking charts when an athlete or such is forced to retire, they have something that indicates that the athlete is retired. Then in standings showings after that, that athlete might not show up on the list or that athlete may be at the bottom of a list being listed as retired and nothing more. Although some events may still show an athletes record for the competition, but they won't have a rank assigned to them.
You seem to confuse the word eliminated and retired from what I've read.
SO explain how we determine TDB then. Your idea leaves up to rd. 7 with 3 fighters and then the thread ends. Then JOE! allows 3rd party people and we have no way of placing them in effective MUs, not to mention we'll have a huge debate over where each person places.
You seem to confuse the word eliminated and retired from what I've read.
DDD, MK, Kirby, Yoshi, Sonic, and Pichu are classified as retired because they are physically unfit to do anything such as walk, or have any chance to compete at all within the competition.
All the other characters are still ranked according to wins and losses.
When a character loses, it doesn't mean that they are instantly sent into the retired slot... they just have a loss added to their record.
An example for clarification.
Lets say you have the Dallas Cowboys.
If the Cowboys lose a game then they aren't considered retired, a loss is just added to their record.
Now, if so many players on their team end up injured or in any way unfit to play football and the Cowboys don't have enough able players to participate in the games, then they would at the discretion of the NFL, be considered retired for the season. They wouldn't be ranked...
I'm not the one who brought up the retirement idea, JOE! was, I was wondering as to why we would worry so much about ranking them if they are retired.
Was that supposed to answer my question?
They are still characters. So retiring them will serve what purpose?
You keep this up and then we have what?
Your explanation makes it seem like they are eliminated so...
A runner breaks his leg during the olympics, as such, he must be retired from the competition.Nova9000 said:They are still characters. So retiring them will serve what purpose?
Retirement: A runner breaks his leg during the olympics, as such, being unfit to run, he must be retired from the competition.Your explanation makes it seem like they are eliminated so...
But you don't see Ganon being banned for being so terrible in Brawl, now do you?well yeah.
think about it: who is left on the rosteer that could give these 4 a fair fight? It'd be the same as bringing Jiggs back so that Ganondorf has another win under his belt for free essentially
I understand both but in this context does it really matter? Like if we rank them they still participated so they belong somewhere.I'm not the one who brought up the retirement idea, JOE! was, I was wondering as to why we would worry so much about ranking them if they are retired.
I consider elimination as being whenever you're fit to participate but are beat out due to not being as skilled or not having the options another does.
Retirement- I consider more like expulsion due to being unfit to participate in the first place.
Also
A runner breaks his leg during the olympics, as such, he must be retired from the competition.
Retirement: A runner breaks his leg during the olympics, as such, being unfit to run, he must be retired from the competition.
Elimination: This runner loses two races in a double elimination foot race tournanament. As such he is eliminated as stated by the rules.
The difference is, retirement is because the character is unfit to participate. Elimination is the character is fit to participate, but due to being of lesser skill than others, is taken out according to certain rules set... but we don't have elimination rules in TDB... do we?
I understand both but in this context does it really matter? Like if we rank them they still participated so they belong somewhere.
Retirement: Jiggs can't move so she must retire since she is unfit to participate.
Elimination: Jiggs lost every MU except the tie w/ Kirby.
Both result in her not being in the competition any longer so no matter how you say it she no longer participates anymore. However, we will rank them so that we can have an analyzed view of where each character stands in regards to being deadly.
Retired teams aren't included in standings.Even using the Cowboys as an example, they would still be ranked, but just in the spot where it's inconsequential.
Hmmm k then.Good point on the retiree thing.
But it's JOE!'s call...I just agree with it.
So . . . a fat penguin can lift an over-sized and mechanical hammer?Hmmm k then.
With that said...
DDD for God Tier :D
DDD at least has his hammer range..... for when the days after the battle starts the two reach each other.
it's enough to beat MK XD besides he has two days to stand it up XD.So . . . a fat penguin can lift an over-sized and mechanical hammer?
Or no?
DDD vs. MKI agree with Kaka-REL. DDD can't lift that nor move. Yoshi can crawl at least. DDD fails more than Yoshi does. Sonic would also place higher than DDD.
That's assuming D3 went on the move...D3 would die of starvation before reaching Metaknight.
D3 has to exert his blatantly over-weight body to move which makes him tire faster and leave him with less stamina.
He might even give himself a heart-attack or a stroke from all the heat being produced from his clothes. Along with all that fat . . .
I would think they still count as the worst...as for the retirement debate, it's really just over terminology I guess.
the point is: those guys are cemented as of now as being the worst characters, and thus shouldnt be bothered with any more as everyone left would simply beat them.
so retired from the compitition makes most sense IMO, but they still count as the worst?
Also remember that MK has a mask and cape and such; holding those up for that amount of time would wear on his body a lot faster than DDD needing to eat. MK is doomed by his armor.That's assuming D3 went on the move...
what if MK went on the move?
what if neither of them moved?
D3 wins the latter two questions giving him majority.... fat is stored energy, so he has reserves to semi survive on unlike MK.
Yea it does but we'll keep up the list.as for the retirement debate, it's really just over terminology I guess.
the point is: those guys are cemented as of now as being the worst characters, and thus shouldnt be bothered with any more as everyone left would simply beat them.
so retired from the compitition makes most sense IMO, but they still count as the worst?
And why do you think that?
I've never reported someone, I wonder what it feels like.
*facepalm*
Did you even consider to read anything?
If so,
Take your bottom lip, pull it over your head and swallow.
Bull
*facepalm*
Did you even consider to read anything?
If so,
Take your bottom lip, pull it over your head and swallow.
Report me? Surely not I...I've never reported someone, I wonder what it feels like.
people, are you just going to leave me hanging on Fox vs. ZSS?
cuz it's annoying arguing with a stone.
EDIT:
***THEORY***
HOLOpaW is actually getting ready to surprise us, and he's going to log on christmas morning...
well, that or he's actually Santa Clause in Disguise.
Bull
Metaknight got this.
MK is an adult Kirby.
Baby/kid Kirby eats a lot.
Adult Kirby may no longer have any or very, very little need for food.
MK never eats.
MK outlasts D3.
D3 will starve to death.
Besides, MK's sword will pierce.
He has all day.
So how does an alien like MK supply himself energy?Metaknight's an alien.
How do you know he'd need to eat more?
Kirby doesn't require constant food for nutrient.
No where is it said he's gotta eat a whole bunch.
I think it's even said his stomach is infinite or "bottom-less".
MK wouldn't be any different.
Heck, D3 has a far worse time approaching MK.
He's shaped like a Golova.
At least MK can poke through skin.
It's impossible for D3 to budge his hammer.
This is the MU summary lol.