My point is that you were halting discussion for no reason. Preventing discussion =/= town goal. You see wifom, you see where it goes then if you can't differentiate alignment. You were complaining at the beginning about having early reads, voting without further proofs, but you weren't doing much of anything really. I just have a hard time trying to see if you're just being inconsistent town (regarding what I put in my second statement), or scum playing "safe town" by not providing anything, appealing to things like the "early reads" issue or "not voting until I have more evidence". For the moment I'm leaning null-scum on you.